1 / 18

Task Group N Procedural Planning May 10, 2004

Task Group N Procedural Planning May 10, 2004. Bruce Kraemer IEEE 802.11 Task Group N (bkraemer@conexant.com). Optimist’s Calendar. 2004. 2005. Pessimist’s Calendar (cont). 2006. 2007. Extract from Selection Procedure 03-665 r9. Extract from Selection Procedure 03-665 r9.

timothyjohnson
Download Presentation

Task Group N Procedural Planning May 10, 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Task Group N Procedural PlanningMay 10, 2004 Bruce Kraemer IEEE 802.11 Task Group N (bkraemer@conexant.com) Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  2. Optimist’s Calendar 2004 2005 Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  3. Pessimist’s Calendar (cont) 2006 2007 Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  4. Extract fromSelection Procedure 03-665 r9 Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  5. Extract fromSelection Procedure 03-665 r9 Steps of the Procedure TGn shall adopt : • Usage Models for the IEEE 802.11n amendment. • Channel Models that may be used for evaluation of proposals. • Functional Requirements that must be met by all complete proposals. • Comparison Criteria that must be addressed by all proposals. Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  6. Extract fromSelection Procedure 03-665 r9 • The task group reserves the right to change the selection process and selection criteria as required with a 75% approval. • Presenters shall classify their proposals as partial or complete. • Complete and partial proposals shall be given up to 60 minutes presentation time including discussion. • All proposal documents and related material (Presentation Material, Functional Requirements Declaration, Comparison Criteria Declaration and Technical Specification) shall be available to the voting members 30 days prior to the session at which they will be presented. Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  7. Tabular Sequence of Events • #1 Call for Proposals • #2 Notice of Intent • #3 Submission • #4 Presentation Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  8. Generic Time line of Events Dates ??? May 17 Documents Complete yy days At least 30 days xx days Event #2 Intent to present Full or Partial proposal notification submitted • Event #3 • Documents posted on IEEE server • Technical Proposal • CC Compliance Report • FR Compliance Report Event #1 Issue call for proposals Event #4 Proposals Presented in TGn Session Events Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  9. Time line – Opt 1Bias toward start of presentations in July Dates Monday May 17, 2004 No later than midnight GMT -5 Friday June 11 IEEE 802 Sessions Open Monday July 12 No later than midnight GMT -5 Monday May 24 At least 30 days 25 days Guidance 18 days Actual 30 days 7 days • Event #3 • Documents posted on IEEE server • Technical Proposal • CC Compliance Report • FR Compliance Report Event #2 Intent to present Full or Partial proposal notification submitted Event #1 Issue call for proposals Event #4 “All?” Proposals Presented in TGn Session Events Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  10. Time line – Opt 2Bias toward time to review Dates IEEE 802 Sessions Open Monday Sep 20 Monday May 17, 2004 No later than midnight GMT -5 Monday July 19 Aug 20 No later than midnight GMT -5 Friday June 18 At least 30 days 60 days Guidance 30 days Actual 50 days 30 days Event #2 Intent to present Full or Partial proposal notification submitted • Event #3 • Documents posted on IEEE server • Technical Proposal • CC Compliance Report • FR Compliance Report Event #1 Issue call for proposals Event #4 “All?” Proposals Presented in TGn Session Events Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  11. Time line – Opt 3Bias toward time for presenter preparation Dates IEEE 802 Sessions Open Monday Sep 20 Monday May 17, 2004 No later than midnight GMT -5 Friday Aug 20 No later than midnight GMT -5 Friday June 18 At least 30 days 80 days Guidance 50 days Actual 30 days 30 days Event #2 Intent to present Full or Partial proposal notification submitted • Event #3 • Documents posted on IEEE server • Technical Proposal • CC Compliance Report • FR Compliance Report Event #1 Issue call for proposals Event #4 “All?” Proposals Presented in TGn Session Events Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  12. March Strawpoll • Which time line option is preferred? • # 1 – begin presentations in July (19) • # 2 – begin presentations in Sept (54) • Allocation of time between events TDB Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  13. May Vote • Which time line option is preferred? • # 1 – begin presentations in July (__) • # 2 – begin presentations in Sept (__) • Allocation of time between events TDB Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  14. Stuff can happen between now and Proposal Presentations • A meteor struck my computer while I was typing the intent to present letter and I missed the E2 deadline. Can I still post this morning? • My husband and I submitted a letter of intent to present. We are now divorced. Can we both present separately? • I posted my intent to present letter but after more careful review of the TGn procedure and documents I do not understand items a,b,c …. • I decide to submit whatever I wanted. I’ll ask for foregiveness later. • I’ll miss the deadlines if I have to wait for the next TGn session? How can I get these questions resolved quickly? • I posted my proposal to the server prior to deadline E3 as required. • Can I post a modification, correction, extension to my proposal after deadline E3? • We continued to enhance the proposal after the deadline. Are we restricted to present only what we originally posted or can we present our extended results? Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  15. How to handle stuff that happens prior to Proposal Presentations? • Cannot wait for TGn to be in session • FRCC disbanded • Need a basic set of guidelines Proposal: • Prepare this week, answers to what-ifs/ FAQs with 75% approval. • Need a mechanism for dealing with other special events Proposal: • Create special committee to convene, ad hoc, at request of TGn chair to deal with special events • Members: TGn leadership, .11 WG leadership • 75% agreement to responses required Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  16. How to Organize going Forward? • Vice chair and Technical editor • TGn vote taken in Singapore (Sept ‘03) approving election of Vice Chair and Technical editor • Agreed with WG chair to postpone elections until FRCC work completed and subcommittees disbanded and sufficient work to justify position • Proposal: Elect tech ed May ; elect VC when justified • Reuse election procedure –tune for TGn • Broader issue is how to conduct work most effectively within TGn and with WG chair? • What internal organization structure best suits our needs? • Assistant editors? Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  17. Time line of Events Week beginning Monday Sep 20 Week beginning Monday May 17 On or before Week beginning Monday Aug 16 Documents Complete xx days 35 days yy days Event #2 Intent to present Full or Partial proposal notification submitted • Event #3 • Documents posted on IEEE server • Technical Proposal • CC Compliance Report • FR Compliance Report Event #1 Issue call for proposals Event #4 Proposals Presented in TGn Session Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

  18. Call for Proposals wording • 03-858 r2 Bruce Kraemer, Conexant

More Related