1 / 10

Next Generation of National Qualifications

Next Generation of National Qualifications. Design of Courses National 4 and National 5 James McVittie SCHOOLS. Some Caveats. Constraints Awareness raising ‘Holding on to what we have’ A changing climate Flexibility v Prescription / Inconsistency. Progression.

tjill
Download Presentation

Next Generation of National Qualifications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Next Generation of National Qualifications Design of Courses National 4 and National 5 James McVittie SCHOOLS

  2. Some Caveats • Constraints • Awareness raising • ‘Holding on to what we have’ • A changing climate • Flexibility v Prescription / Inconsistency

  3. Progression • The senior phase – structures • Timetabling • The number of subjects to be taken • Pathways for progression • Progression from CfE levels • Progression to other than Higher • Progression to Higher and Adv Higher

  4. Delivery Issues • By-passing levels • Safety Net • Bi-level teaching • Course design – articulation/hierarchy • Mathematics and Science subjects

  5. Design Issues • Welcome for emphasis on skills • Course specifications and exemplars • Articulation of levels/safety nets • Units • Flexibility v Consistency • Credibility of National 4 – Internal • Coursework - workload

  6. Inclusion • Strong support for inclusive approach • Perceived need for definition of terms • Assistive technologies • Very good relationships with SQA • Exemptions • Support and guidance materials • Arrangements being pushed and challenged

  7. Quality Assurance • Arguments for external assessment: - Credibility of National 4 - Teacher- pupil relationship - Motivation for learners - Fairness for pupils

  8. Quality Assurance • Concerns about internal assessment: - Potential for abuse - Pressure on teachers from parents - Possible increase in teacher workload - Teachers’ experience of current verification arrangements

  9. Quality Assurance - Some Positives • Understanding Standards • Professional dialogue • Moderation – partnerships welcomed • Quality networks within and across authorities • e-assessment

  10. Quality Assurance • Credible and reliable framework possible IF we provide: - Resources, including time for curriculum leaders - Course specifications, assessment criteria, exemplar materials - Robust, rigorous and well-structured measures for internal and external verification – not only in the first few years but permanently

More Related