240 likes | 592 Views
Develop a Strategic and Integrated Energy Plan. Address a Wide Range of Complex and Inter-related Demand-Side and Supply-Side OptionsProject Development: Implement ECMs/EEMs/FIMs using Existing Operating Budget, w/ Applied Capital as neededLoad Management: PJM Demand ResponsePortfolio Purchasing:
E N D
1. PASBO Facilities Management Conference A Strategic Plan
For
Managing Energy Costs
With a Focus on
Performance Contracting
2. Develop a Strategic and Integrated Energy Plan Address a Wide Range of Complex and Inter-related Demand-Side and Supply-Side Options
Project Development: Implement ECMs/EEMs/FIMs using Existing Operating Budget, w/ Applied Capital as needed
Load Management: PJM Demand Response
Portfolio Purchasing: Green/Brown Power in Retail Markets
Incorporate Iterative Evaluation Techniques
Benchmarking: Establish “Baseline” Utilization Profiles
Measurement & Verification: Monitor/Quantify Impacts
3. Performance Contracting A means of implementing a self-funded energy-efficiency and facility improvement construction program that:
Allows the costs of installation to be paid with no out-of-pocket capital expense from funds already in the existing operating budget;
Directs savings from energy-efficiency measures to the payment of installation, financing and supporting O&M costs; and
Guarantees that the energy savings achieved will exceed and pay for all project costs.
4. Background/Evolution “Shared Savings”
Efficient equipment installed by an energy company resulting in reduced utility bills
Utility cost savings shared at a pre-determined percentage, allowing for cost coverage and profit
Lower energy costs => longer paybacks => defaults
Performance Contracting
Pre-established “Baseline” Usage and Rates to quantify and confirm “savings”
5. Why PC? Capital budget constraints, financing availability, limited staff resources/expertise
Frees capital budget dollars for other use
Leverage funds in concert with PLANCON
Permits use of “applied capital” to project
Turn-key Operation/One-Stop Shopping
Streamlined process for comprehensive projects
Incorporate use of local, trusted subcontractors
Long Term Benefits
Improved environment and comfort levels
Staff education and training
6. Pennsylvania Application Guaranteed Energy Savings Act (“GESA”)
most currently updated as Act 77 of 2004
allows “governmental units” (including School Districts) to utilize Performance Contracting
permits for up to 15 years financing
not subject to the restrictions of “Low Bid”
considers “Best Value” and “Highest Quality”
7. GESA Advantages Conventional Bid/Spec
Energy projects compete for limited budget resources with other improvement projects
Requires several years to secure funds to
implement energy projects
Incremental project implementation misses savings design opportunities
Piecemeal approach to bidding and managing
separate project components = high staff costs
Multiple contracts with multiple vendors can result in conflicting project requirements
GESA Project
Energy projects are funded with utility bill savings
All funds needed for comprehensive energy project are readily available
Comprehensive project implementation maximizes savings design opportunities
Lower staff costs and quicker completion of a comprehensive project
Single contract with single point accountability for project performance
8. ECM / FIM Applications Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) and Facility Improvement Measures (FIMs)
Traditional (lighting, HVAC, controls, etc.)
Causally related (roofs, carpeting, paint)
Non-causally related (whatever - 15% of Total)
New in “Act 77”
Review and inclusion of capital improvement projects
Facility Management Services
Renewables and Demand Response
9. Procedural Elements
10. Opportunity Assessment Utility Bill Review
Generate Current Baseline Data
Staff Interviews
“Wish List”
Near-Term Capital Budget
Facilities Review
“Walk Through”
11. Consensus Building O & M Personnel
Allay fears and stay involved through oversight
Administrative/Financial
Improvements to Facilities & Learning Environment with expert installation and no new funds
Board
Mitigate tough capital budget & “taxes” decisions
12. Solicitation of Proposals Preparation
Schedule: Pre-proposal conference, submittal date, clarifying Q&A period, interviews
Evaluation
Criteria Weights & Scoring
Encourage Creativity, Incorporate Flexibility, Include Protection Provisions
13. Proposal Review & Recommendation Proposal Presentation
Firm’s Qualifications
Comfort Level During ESCO’s Survey/Audit
Technical
As Close to “Apples to Apples” as Possible
Project Management
Financial Benefit
14. Final Design & Documents Utilize “Design Build” Mindset
Mix and Match ECMs to Create “Best Value” Project
Energy Service Agreements are Negotiable!!
Financial Terms & Conditions
Detailed Scope of Work
User and ESCO Responsibilities
Risk Parameters
Typical Construction Provisions
Incorporate trusted and experienced local vendors and/or subcontractors into the ESCO team.
15. Measurement & Verification (“M&V”) Identifying, Measuring and Quantifying Savings
Approach based on specific ECM and costs of M&V
International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (“IPMVP”)
“A”: engineering calculations, “stipulated” savings
“B”: “A”+ “Pre-Post” measurements
“C”: “B”+ metered utility data vs. baseline usage
“D”: “C” similarities w/ calibrated simulation
16. M&V Options Matrix
17. Project Oversight Manage Analysis of Energy Efficiency Options
Tailor/Refine Cost Effectiveness Analysis
Support Project Financing Efforts
Consider Ongoing Consultancy/Management
Design, Implementation, Savings assessments, M&V, Problem Resolution
18. Case Study K-12 School District
Facility needs stimulated action on cost reduction efforts
Needs identified
Energy efficiency improvements
Facility upgrades
19. Case Study: Results K-12 School District
Modernized facilities and equipment
Capital financing commitment of $3.3 M
Guaranteed annual savings of >$386,000
Positive cash flow after debt service!
20. Case Study: Graphical Results
21. Case Study: Graphical Results
22. Case Study: Graphical Results
23. Who is Provident Energy? PA PUC Licensed Energy Supplier
Electricity since 1998, Natural Gas since 2007
Highly Knowledgeable and Capable Team
40+ Years Energy Industry Experience
Education: Engineering, Environment, Finance
Current Client Aggregation:
700 Million KWh, 200 MW, 2 Million DKTh
Includes ~70 School Districts
24. Why Provident Energy? Lengthy Experience in GESA Project Development, Management & Evaluation
Local Firm, Local Clients, Local Public Involvement, Established Tradition, Measurable Results
Independent Consulting Firm w/ Vast Industry Experience
Address Needs & “Wish List” Items in Capital Budget
Tailor RFQ/RFP to Fully Advantage William Penn SD Wants/Goals
Ensure Competition from Reputable/Capable ESCOs
Thorough Review of Submittals; Expert Recommendation
Creativity in Scope Development & Project Implementation
Keen Insight into Contract Language and Potential Pitfalls
Personal Client Relationships: Key to Success
25. Contact Information Joseph S. Solomon, President
Voice: 610.565.0633
Facsimile: 610.565.7853
jsolomon@ProvidentEnergyUS.com
Michael R. Lang, Principal
Voice: 610.565.5507
Facsimile: 610.565.7853
mlang@ProvidentEnergyUS.com
www.ProvidentEnergyUS.com