1 / 33

Addressing the linkages between climate change and vulnerability to food insecurity

Addressing the linkages between climate change and vulnerability to food insecurity. Testing a methodology in Nicaragua. Jeronim Capaldo – Agricultural Economics Division (ESA) Anna Ricoy - Climate, Energy and Tenure Division (NRC). Purpose , rationale and approach. Purpose

trilby
Download Presentation

Addressing the linkages between climate change and vulnerability to food insecurity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Addressing the linkages between climate change and vulnerability to food insecurity Testinga methodology in Nicaragua Jeronim Capaldo – Agricultural Economics Division (ESA) Anna Ricoy - Climate, Energy and Tenure Division (NRC)

  2. Purpose, rationale and approach • Purpose To contribute to a comprehensive research approach that bridges the gap between analysis of climate change (CC) impacts on food security (FS) and policy-making • Rationale Downscale the broad and global CC agenda at the local level Engage policy makers to better address the impact of CC on FS at household level • Approach Focus on vulnerable groups Address the access component of FS

  3. Background: Conceptual framework on CC and FS Adaptive responses Climate change variables CO2 fertilization effects Increase in global temp. Changes in precipitation Frequency of extreme events Greater weather variability Changes in Components of Food Security Food availability Food accessibility Food utilization Food system stability Changes in Food Systems Assets Food production assets Infrastructure Agriculturally-based livelihoods Non-farm livelihoods assets Food preparation assets Changes in Food Systems Activities Producing food Storing and processing of food Distributing food Consuming food Changes in consumption patters Migration Source: Interdepartmental Group on Climate Change (IDWG) 2008

  4. Background: Conceptual framework on CC and FS Adaptive responses Climate change variables CO2 fertilization effects Increase in global temp. Changes in precipitation Frequency of extreme events Greater weather variability Changes in Components of Food Security Food availability Food accessibility Food utilization Food system stability Changes in Food Systems Assets Food production assets Infrastructure Agriculturally-based livelihoods Non-farm livelihoods assets Food preparation assets Changes in Food Systems Activities Producing food Storing and processing of food Distributing food Consuming food Changes in consumption patters Migration Source: Interdepartmental Group on Climate Change (IDWG) 2008

  5. Key analytical questions • How does CC affect access to food at household level? • How does household vulnerability to food insecurity evolve as a result of CC? • How will vulnerability be distributed as a result of CC? • What policy instruments to increase the resilience of vulnerable groups to deal with the impact of CC on FS? • How to improve the design and targeting of policy responses to address the impacts of CC on vulnerable groups?

  6. Methodological framework Addressing the linkages between CC and vulnerability to food insecurity Analysis of implications at policy level Analysis of vulnerability to food insecurity Downscaling of GCM using RCM Policy recommendations for the design and implementation of targeted policy interventions Detailed profiling of vulnerable households groups High-resolution CC projections at district level

  7. Methodological framework Addressing the linkages between CC and vulnerability to food insecurity Analysis of implications at policy level Analysis of vulnerability to food insecurity Downscaling of GCM using RCM Policy recommendations for the design and implementation of targeted policy interventions Detailed profiling of vulnerable households groups High-resolution CC projections at district level

  8. 1 - Downscaling of CC scenarios • Generation of high-resolution climate change projections using RCMs (PRECIS, Hadley Center) • Under ECHAM4, for A2 scenario • CC scenarios to a 50x50km scale for the whole Nicaragua, at “municipio” level • Time series of estimated temperature and precipitation projections to the 2030 horizon Change Temperature (Annual mean) –2080s coordinates of the PRECIS grid

  9. Methodological framework Addressing the linkages between CC and vulnerability to food insecurity Analysis of implications at policy level Analysis of vulnerability to food insecurity Downscaling of GCM using RCM Policy recommendations for the design and implementation of targeted policy interventions Detailed profiling of vulnerable households groups High-resolution CC projections at district level

  10. 2 - Analysis of vulnerability to food insecurity • Quantitative analysis of the livelihood effect of CC: • building on the notion of vulnerability to food insecurity • using an analytical model developed by ESA based on rural national household datasets • CC enters the model through the impacts that temperature and precipitation changes have on income (value of land productivity)and food consumption (expenditure) • Model allows characterizing vulnerability and identifying variables associated with highest levels of vulnerability  Profiling of vulnerable household groups

  11. Methodological framework Addressing the linkages between CC and vulnerability to food insecurity Analysis of implications at policy level Analysis of vulnerability to food insecurity Downscaling of GCM using RCM Policy recommendations for the design and implementation of targeted policy interventions Detailed profiling of vulnerable households groups High-resolution CC projections at district level

  12. 3 - Analysis of policy implications Purpose: to provide recommendations for improvements in the design and targeting of policy responses that address the impacts of CC on household FS Next steps, in-country: What instruments should be promoted to increase households’ ability to cope with the impacts of CC on FS and adapt to climate change? What are the policies, institutions and multi-level governance arrangements needed to support vulnerable households? • Links to specific practices: synergies adaptation, mitigation,, FS • Short + long-term policies addressing DRM/CCA measures tailored to vulnerable groups • Integration of the linkages between CC and household FS within all the phases of the policy cycle • Coherence between the local, national, regional level

  13. Presentation of results of the analysis of vulnerability to food insecurity Addressing the linkages between CC and vulnerability to food insecurity Analysis of implications at policy level Analysis of vulnerability to food insecurity Downscaling of GCM using RCM High-resolution CC projections at district level Detailed profiling of vulnerable households groups Policy recommendations for the design and implementation of targeted policy interventions Capaldo, P. Karfakis, M. Knowles, M. Smulders - ESA

  14. Background on analysis of vulnerability to food insecurity • Improve targeting and design of interventions • Initial steps • Conceptual and methodological developments • Country application

  15. Concepts • Definitions of vulnerability: • Vulnerability to what? • Current or future? • Our view: • A household’s probability to fall or stay below a food-security threshold

  16. Concepts

  17. Analytical model Households’ Demographic characteristics Households’ Assets Climate Data Data Distribution of Land Productivity Model Distribution of Consumption HH Food Security Threshold Vulnerability output Vulnerability Threshold Categorization of Households Targeting Profiles

  18. Data sources • Households: • Rural Income-generating Activities dataset (RIGA) • 1831 Households surveyed in 2001 • Climate: • Temperature and precipitation • PRECIS ECHAM4, A2 scenario • Downscaled data

  19. Geographic distribution of vulnerability

  20. Improved targeting Proportion of vulnerable households and average vulnerability (2001)

  21. Improved targeting Proportion of vulnerable households and average vulnerability (2001)

  22. Improved targeting Proportion of vulnerable households and average vulnerability (2001)

  23. Profile of vulnerable households: gender Proportion of vulnerable households and average vulnerability (2001), by gender of head of household

  24. Profile of vulnerable households: assets and livelihoods

  25. Vulnerability and Crops

  26. Profile of vulnerable households: assets and livelihoods education of head < 3 years highest education in the hh < 6 years household size > 5 members agriculture oriented > 50% share of income low use of fertilizers and pesticides in the area livestock in TLU < 4 units no irrigation no credit access distance to road > 60 km distance to health facility > 6 km distance to school > 1.5 km

  27. Policy Simulations: Current Climate

  28. Policy Simulations: Higher Temperatures

  29. Policy Simulations: Higher Temp.+ Responses

  30. Conclusions on the analysis of vulnerability to food insecurity • Model contributes to improved program design and preparedness planning by: • Making distinction between transitory and chronically food insecure households • Estimating impact of shocks (e.g. climate) on household vulnerability and number of affected households • Profiling the vulnerable

  31. Lessons learned How can the assessment be improved? • matching data to geographical locations with GIS • biophysical impacts on crop production • Estimation of vulnerability with climate data requires non-linear models • Estimation of probability

  32. Moving forward • Nicaragua is a pilot. Lessons learned will serve to improve the methodology • Replication envisaged in different institutional and policy contexts • Ultimate goal is to develop a robust research framework on the impacts of CC on household FS and related policy-level implications

  33. Thank you! Anna Ricoy anna.ricoy@fao.org Jeronim Capaldo jeronim.capaldo@fao.org

More Related