280 likes | 297 Views
Explore the significance of the upcoming UN High-Level Conference on Nuclear Disarmament in 2018, its key objectives, and potential outcomes. This conference aims to elevate global awareness, encourage governmental actions, and discuss concrete measures for nuclear disarmament. Discover the momentum behind this initiative and how it aligns with sustainable development goals. Uncover insights on nuclear expenditure, industry influence, and movements advocating for divestment from nuclear weapons corporations. Join the conversation on achieving a nuclear-weapon-free world with hashtags #ReachHIGH2018 and #YouthAgainstNukes.
E N D
Visions for the 2018 UN High-Level Conference on Nuclear DisarmamentAlyn WareOttawa, September 2017
UN decides to hold High-Level Conference on Nuclear Disarmament UN General Assembly Resolution 68/32 (2013): • Hold a series of annualhigh-level meetings on nuclear disarmament; • Establish September 26 as the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons; • Convene a UN High Level Conference on Nuclear Disarmament no later than 2018 in order evaluate progress and advance further the elimination of nuclear weapons, including through negotiations for a nuclear weapons convention.
Value of UN High-Level Conferences • Elevate political, media and public attention to nuclear disarmament; • Increase governmental action, including through foreign ministries; • Provide opportunity for parliamentary questions, motions; • Raise expectations of concrete measures to be adopted.
Recent UN High Level Conferences • 2015 UN Sustainable Development Summit. Developed and adopted the 17 Sustainable Development Goals; • 2015. UN Climate Change Conference. Achieved the Paris Agreement; • 2016. UN Summit on Refugees and Migrants. Achieved the NY Declaration; • 2017. UN Oceans Conference. Achieved the 14-point action plan ‘Our Ocean: Our Future.’
UNGA 2017 resolution • Dates and venues for the preparatory meeting and the UNHLC • Mandate/Agenda outline • Rules of procedure
Rules of procedure • Conference on Disarmament – consensus • NPT Review Conferences – tradition of consensus • UN conference to negotiate ban treaty – UNGA (voting possible) • Nuclear Security Summits – gift basket approach • 2018 UN High Level Conference - ?
Agenda and possible outcomes? • Ban treaty: signatories, ratifications and entry-into-force • Nuclear-risk reduction: de-alerting, no-first-use, transparency, verification; • Stockpile reduction: strategic and tactical • Framework for elimination: elements and process • Regional measures: Nuclear-weapon-free zones; • Nuclear disarmament and sustainable development: UN Article 26, budgets, divestment
Momentum for UN HLC • OSCE Parliamentary Assembly • Inter-Parliamentary Union • PNND/UNFOLD ZERO consultations • Abolition 2000 working group on the 2018 UNHLC • GCSP and Arab Institute events
Reach HIGH for a nuclear-weapon-free world Hashtags: #ReachHIGH2018, #Sep26dontNukeUs, #abolishnukes, and/or #YouthAgainstNukes.
Nuclear disarmament and sustainable development goals Financing the SDGs
Smarter Approach to Nuclear Expenditure (SANE) ActUS Senator Ed Markey, PNND Co-President
Eisenhower on the military-industrial complex • The conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence—economic, political, even spiritual—is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. Farewell address, January 17, 1961
United Kingdom:Unions support nuclear weapons spending and oppose Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn
Nuclear weapons complex • Most of the nuclear weapons money goes to private companies which are awarded contracts to manufacture, modernize and maintain nuclear weapons and their delivery vehicles. For these companies, the bloated budgets are in their interests. • Indeed, the companies actively lobby their parliaments and governments to continue allocating the funds to nuclear weapons. • And they support think tanks and other public initiatives to promote the ‘need’ for nuclear weapons maintenance, modernization or expansion.
US$50 billion in sales – 80% military • Nearly 300 lobbyists in Washington “Lockheed Martin is a global leader in the design, manufacture and support of military aircraft. The goal: To provide a full spectrum of aeronautical resources to allow the U.S. and its allies to conduct air operations anywhere, any time.” Lockheed Martin website
Norwegian parliamentarians and civil society have moved the Norwegian multi-billion dollar Pension Fund to divest from corporations involved in the manufacture of nuclear weapons. New Zealand Superannuation Fund and other government funds have followed suit. Swiss War Materials Act of 2012 prohibits investments in nuclear weapons corporations. Lichtenstein 2016 adopted legislation on nuclear divestment Nuclear Divestment:actions by non-nuclear states Norwegian MP Hallgeir Langeland Promoted Norwegian divestment from nuclear weapons corporations
Nuclear Divestment:Actions by cities, churches, universities (especially in nuclear states) • A number of cities have already begun divesting in fossil fuel companies and in companies manufacturing cluster munitions and landmines. • Now some cities are also divesting from nuclear weapons corporations, e.g. Cambridge (USA)
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons Article 1 Each State Party undertakes never under any circumstances to… (f) Assist, encourage, or induce, in any way, anyone to engage in any activity prohibited to a State Party under this Treaty;
Global Campaign on Military SpendingGlobal Days of Action: April 18-28 http://demilitarize.org www.ipb.org
Don’t bank on the bomb Lists banks which invest in nuclear weapons and encourages people not to have accounts in these banks
Kazakhstan President Nazarbayev 1% of military spending to go to SDGs
Abolition 2000 working group on economic dimensions of nuclearism
Eisenhower on the military-industrial complex As we peer into society's future, we – you and I, and our government – must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering for our own ease and convenience the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow. Farewell speech, 1961
Contacts • www.unfoldzero.org • www.baselpeaceoffice.org • www.worldfuturecouncil.org • alyn@pnnd.org • www.pnnd.org • www.abolition2000.org