140 likes | 419 Views
RCM Methodology Report. David Thresher Frank Blankinship. Agenda. Reliability Centered Maintenance Introduction Buildings Covered: 8116,8120,8110,8115 Run to Fail items MAS changes Summary. Proposal Requirements. IAW with the proposal sub factor 4, facilities support section, 4.2:
E N D
RCM Methodology Report David Thresher Frank Blankinship
Agenda • Reliability Centered Maintenance Introduction • Buildings Covered: 8116,8120,8110,8115 • Run to Fail items • MAS changes • Summary
Proposal Requirements • IAW with the proposal sub factor 4, facilities support section, 4.2: • We assume responsibility for all equipment and their associated PM tasks. • RCM team will complete an assessment of the inventory for all equipment listed in the A2 table. • As we complete our inventory validation process, we will begin to phase in our RCM approach to PM’s. • Implementation of RCM will benefit USAFA in three ways: • Reduced costs of preventive maintenance. • Enhanced system reliability, resulting in a fewer equipment outages. • Improved data to plan for and justify long range equipment replacement projects.
RCM Introduction • Definition - Reliability Centered Maintenance can be defined as “an approach to maintenance that combines reactive, preventive, predictive, and proactive maintenance practices and strategies to maximize the life that a piece of equipment functions in the required manner.”
RCM Introduction • Our RCM program works in a progression of related steps:
RCM Introduction RCM Principles: 1.RCM is Driven by Safety First, then Economics: • Safety must be maintained at any cost; it always comes first in any maintenance task. • The cost of maintaining safe working conditions is not calculated as a cost of RCM. • Once safety on the job is ensured, RCM assigns costs to all other activities.
RCM Introduction RCM Principles: 2. RCM Recognizes Four Maintenance Categories and Uses a Logic Tree to Screen Maintenance Tasks: • This ensures consistency in determining how to perform maintenance on all types of facility equipment. • Each piece of equipment is assigned to one of four categories:
Inspection Process • Team locates equipment, validates location and makes appropriate location changes • Inspects visual condition, obvious needed maintenance, barcode and record all available nomenclature • Determine criticality, validate PM (MAS) task and frequency, make proper changes • Identifies critical equipment not in the A2 table and recommends adding it
Logic Diagram • Expendable • Non critical • Under $7500 • Redundancy • Predicative Technology • Cost/Critical • What technology can be used (thermo, oil analysis, ultrasonic, voltage/ampere and vibration analysis)
Run to Fail by Facility • 8116: 22 Items • Annualized MHRS: 25.6 • 8120: 4 Items • Annualized MHRS: 4.5 • 8115: 1 Items • Annualized MHRS: 1.2 • 8110: 89 Items • Annualized MHRS: 107.5 • TOTAL Items = 116 • TOTAL MHRS = 139
Recommended MAS Changes by Facility • Building 8110: Recommended 30 items • Proposed savings 27 MHRS • Building 8116: Recommended 16 items • Proposed savings 2.6 MHRS • Building 8115: Recommended 8 items • Proposed savings 5.5 MHRS
Recommended MAS Changes Base Wide • Recommended MAS changes to Air Handlers • Proposed savings 352 MHRS • Proposed Material savings = $59,657
Summary • Facilities Reviewed = 4 • Total Items Condition Assessed = 619 • Total Proposed MHRS Saved = 529.3