1 / 25

Promises, Promises

Promises, Promises. Reflections on the relationships between international test scores and economic development. This presentation makes 3 claims:.

tyrone
Download Presentation

Promises, Promises

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Promises, Promises Reflections on the relationships between international test scores and economic development.

  2. This presentation makes 3 claims: A. The international testing agencies send a misleading message to governments in the developed world concerning the affect of improvement in tests scores (PISA and TIMSS) on economic growth.B. This message filters through the curricula of different education systems and affects the internal balance between what is and what isn’t “in the test.”C. Accepting the assumption that by improving test scores we make a significant contribution to economic growth we neglect exploring alternative strategies while placing enormous , unjustified, pressure on the education system to confirm with the testing regime.

  3. A Global Promise! • States must improve their education in general and test scores in particular in order to be able to compete globally. • "one standard deviation difference on test performance is related to 1% difference in annual growth rates of GDP per capita."

  4. Improvement in GDP as a Consequence of an improvement in Education Percent addition to GDP 10-year reform 20-year reform 30-year reform Total U.S. K-12 spending Note: *K-12 education expenditures are assumed to be constant at the level attained in 2005. These data show that economic benefits from a 1989 reform that raised the U.S. to the highest levels of test performance would cover the cost of K-12 education by 2015 Source: Eric Hanushek

  5. In presentations made by Dr Andres Schleicher the curve is repeated with the same prediction: "every gain of 25 points in the PISSA test contributes 1% to the growth of GDP per capita." • This graph is taken from a presentation given by Dr Andres Schleicher, at the Taube Center in Israel, 2011.

  6. How strong is the correlation between educational achievements and economic ?performance

  7. Before looking at the data A. the pace of growth is only one economic indicator that says relatively little about the overall state of the economy or the quality of life in any particular country. B. It’s easier, for developing economies to grow faster. Looking at charts comparing the rate of growth of a fast developing economy like Ghana (with a GDP per capita of 1,884$) to the rate of growth of a developed economy like Finland (with a GDP per capita of 38,083$) one should be aware of the “meaning” of 1% growth in each of these countries.

  8. Growth Patterns and a Global Shift of Power   According to the 2011 report of HBSC research center the countries that will grow fastest in the next few decades are: The Philippines, Peru, Malaysia, Egypt and Pakistan. The developed Western countries especially small states like Finland, Sweden and Norway (all known for their high quality of education and excellent test scores) will drop out of the list of the 30th strongest economies and will grow relatively slowly.   Karen Ward, The world in 2050, quantifying the shift in the Global Economy, HSBC Global Research 2011

  9. Economic Watch lists the fastest growing economies in 2010: Ghana, Qatar, Turkmenistan, Liberia, India, Iraq, Ethiopia, Mozambique, East Timor and Laos,[1] except for China none of these countries participated in the international tests and if they would have done so they would have probably ranked rather low on the achievements list. Moreover, one could hardly claim that they are capitalizing on past educational achievements as their educational systems are relatively poor and the level of illiteracy is very high. Economic Watch: Fastest Growing Economies Economic Watch lists the fastest growing economies in 2010 were: Ghana, Qatar, Turkmenistan, Liberia, India, Iraq, Ethiopia, Mozambique, East Timor and Laos .

  10. Illiteracy and growth In one of the fastest growing economies, Ghana, 12% of the population never attended school, 10% dropout between 1st and 5th grade, 40% dropout between 6th and 9th grade, 32% finished 9th grade without being literate and only 5% were literate at 9th grade. In fact the global map of fast growing economies correlates better with the map of high levels of illiteracy than with that of high test scores.

  11. Forecast of growth rates of real GDP

  12. Developing world: The influence of the balance of acquired skills and cheap labor on economic growth. Developed world: what is the present rate of return to improvements in education and test scores? Are reaching an educational plateau? Are we losing out in the “Global Auction”?

  13. Test Scores and Growth in the Developed World Tienken analyzes the correlation between test scores and Growth Competitiveness Index (GCI) and shows that "nations with strong economies (e.g., the top 22 nations on GCI) demonstrate a weak, non-significant relationship between the ranks on international tests of mathematics and science achievements and economic strength as measured by the GCI ranks. The relationships are stronger in countries that are grouped in the bottom 50% of the GCI ranking.   • Christopher H. Tienken, Ranking of International Achievement Test Performance and Economic Strength: Correlation or Conjecture?, in International Journal of Educational Policy and Leadership, 2008, Vol. 3 no. 4. p. 9

  14. The 2011 HSBC study relies on the work of the Harvard economist Robert Barro yet argues that the original model overestimated the impact of education assuming an extra year of schooling serves to raise GDP growth by 1.2% points. Countries with very high levels of education, such as Germany, were therefore forecasted to grow much faster than they did, and countries such as India with very low levels of education were barely forecast to grow at all. • R. J. Barro, 1991 Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, pp. 407-443; Kareb Ward, Ibid., p. 32

  15. "recalibrating the model to lower the impact of education produced remarkably accurate forecasts for such a simple model."

  16. An Artifact? Examining the relations between test results and real GDP growth in the developed world and the strong linear correlation between the two variables now seems as an artifact of a certain political environment and historical period (European states in the post World War II period) when GDP and educational achievements grow synchronically.

  17. Questioning the Ruling Educational Paradigm In the developed world improving test scores = improving global competitiveness and enhancing growth “If we don’t out-educate them they will out-compete us!”

  18. What can we learn from PISA and TIMSS?

  19. A recent report coming out of the Silicon Valley Education Foundation suggests that regression models used explains the variation in TIMSS scores show that : 68.1% of the variation is explained by “out-of the system variables” (number of books at home – that probably correlated to parents' education and income influences 45.5%!!!!, immigration rates (3.2.%); urban areas (4%); and controlling for Asian countries (13.5%); 6.6% to education quality factors (class size, teacher development workshop) and 2.2% to institutional factors(pay-for –performance. • Jack Bugas, Porter Kalbus, Jackie Rotman, Ali Troute, Pa NhiaVang, What Can we Learn about the US Education System from International Comparisons? A paper prepared for the Silicon Valley Education Foundation, March 2012, p,IV

  20. The rest of the analysis asks how to improve the 8.8% in-the-system variables "Although the large majority of the variation is explained by out-of-system factors, these factors are largely fixed, so education policy must primarily focus on making changes to in-system factors."

  21. Social conservatism educational reforms Most of the debate about improving education – which seems reformative in form – is deeply conservative in nature -- it attempts to improve education in order to create a better foundation for economic growth while keeping the present social order intact. The gap between the inspirational language of educational reform and the real amount of change it can bring about accounts for the ongoing disappointment from the power of education to change social reality. It also places an enormous, unfair burden, on the shoulders of those who are affected by the 68% out of school variables (students and teachers alike) to catch up educationally and overcome socio-economic limiting factors they can hardly control.

  22. :A questionas PISA and TIMSS show a strong correlation between social class and educational achievements why is it that best practice recommendations rarely deal withsocial equality fighting povertymalnutrition

  23. Missing the Target? The international tests have many virtues but they miss the target: The tests carry no global receipt for growth or competitiveness The “promise” systematically overestimates the contribution of improved test scores to economic growth in the developed world. Best Practices avoid recommending social policy necessary to improve education Educational achievements/failures are de-contextualized The blame for slow growth, “no hope”, lack of profitable jobs and the growing class of educated poor is placed on the shoulder of educators.

More Related