360 likes | 445 Views
being in the bulls eye Higher Education in Latin America …is the playing field level. Economic and social development are increasingly driven by the advancement and application of knowledge
E N D
being in the bulls eye Higher Education in Latin America…is the playing field level THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Economic and social development are increasingly driven by the advancement and application of knowledge Education in general — and tertiary education and S&T in particular — are fundamental to the construction of knowledge economies THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
However, S&T systems in developing and transition countries face persistent problems of finance, efficiency, equity, quality and governance New challenges linked to rapid changes in technology, communication and the globalization of trade and labor markets have amplified the traditional problems of tertiary education and research and development and S&T THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Global trends THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Composition of the global market for goods THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Global innovation hubs Source: Hillner (2000) and UNDP (2001) THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Internet Hosts(pr 10,000 people, 2000) THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Higher Education Enrollment Ratio THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Some European countries, ad especially the Caribbean and Africa, face significant emigration rates of their elites (sometimes exceeding 50%) Source: OECD, Trends in International Migrations 2004 THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Internationalization of Higher Education THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Internationalization has important implications for inserting future leaders and knowledge workers in the global community and gaining equal access to the rapidly increasing pool of knowledge and know-how THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Key developments in tertiary education in Latin America THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Returns by level of educationBrazil (1982=100)Source: Blom; Holm-Nielsen and Verner (2001) THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Large increase in tertiary enrollment THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS Source: WDI 2003
Growth in private provision Percent of total enrollment Year 75%-40% 40%-30% 30%-20% 20%-10% Less than 10% 1985 Brazil Colombia Dom. Republic Chile El Salvador Peru Argentina Guatemala Paraguay Costa Rica Ecuador Honduras Mexico Nicaragua Venezuela Bolivia Panama Uruguay Cuba 2002* Brazil Colombia Chile Dom. Republic El Salvador Nicaragua Paraguay Peru Venezuela Costa Rica Ecuador Argentina Guatemala Mexico Honduras Bolivia Panama Uruguay Cuba THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS Source: Schwartzman (2002); World Bank (2002c and 2003); Zúñiga (2003); OECD (2002a) and García Gaudilla (1998)
What are the issues? • Weak systems and institutional management • Lack of cohesion • Inequitable participation • Inefficiency • Low quality and relevance • Weak national innovation systems • Balance in financing tertiary education • Brain Drain THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Short Cycle Tertiary institutions Private Universities Public Universities R&D Institutes Tertiary Education System International networks Private Sector Government, MINEDUC, etc. Weak systems and institutional management • Low access to reliable and relevant information • Lack of accountability in use of public subsidies • Weak university management and governance structures • Insufficient capacity in MoEs for sector oversight and strategy • Inadequate systemic coherence THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Potential actions • Build transparent management information systems in order to provide a solid basis for decision-making • Consolidate capacity for real autonomy with accountability by strengthening institutional governance and professional management, and manage by results • Procure technical assistance to ministries of education to consolidate adequate policy framework for tertiary education, strengthen long-term evaluation and planning, and manage by results THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Lack of cohesion • Secondary and tertiary institutions are not working together to bridge gaps in tertiary opportunities • Weak linkages between universities and non-university tertiary institutions • No systems for the transfer of academic credits Skill level University Educational dead-end Short cycle tertiary education Learning gap Low quality Secondary THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Potential actions • Motivate and enable poor and socially excluded students to complete secondary education and achieve academic excellence • Strengthen linkages between university and non-university sub-systems by bridging between short and long cycle programs • Support mechanisms for the transfer of academic credits, e.g. by promoting module-based curricula design (Bologna like process) THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Inequitable participation • TE still elitist with the majority of students coming from the wealthiest segments of society • Inadequate student aid for poor students • Not enough opportunities in regions THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS Source: World Bank (2002); ADB (2003); Del Bello (2002); Delannoy (2000); US Census Bureau (2002) and Chronicle of Higher Education (2003) Note: Calculations for the United States are based on the characteristics of freshmen at 4-year colleges in fall 2002
Potential actions • Making student loans available to academically bright, but financially needy students while promoting performance in cost-recovery and administrative efficiency • Using income-contingent loan schemes to help low-income families to overcome the lack of collateral and fear of defaulting on traditional ‘mortgage-style’ student loan debt • Supporting tertiary education in regions with links to local needs and as stepping stone towards advanced education THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Inefficiency (Argentina) • High drop-out rates, repetition, low graduation and extended cycles • Few financial incentives to improve learning outcomes and efficiency THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Potential actions • Consolidate monitoring and evaluation systems and ensure reliable statistical data • Support for degree structure and curricular redesign • Link public resource allocation with objective performance and outcome criteria through performance contacts and competitive funding THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Low quality and relevance • Insufficient qualifications and mobility of university professors • Too little innovation of teaching methodologies and curriculum • University graduates do not meet the skills needs in the economy THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS Source: Brunner (2002), World Bank (2002); UK Higher Education Statistics Agency Individualized Staff Record 2001/02; García Gaudilla (1998) and Schwartzman and Balbachevsky (1996)
Potential actions • Promote the use of quality assurance mechanisms with external peer-review • Strengthen graduate programs, and establish financial and promotional incentives for teachers to perform • Establish institutional strategies for staff renewal • Upgrade teaching facilities, learning materials and research equipment • Develop competency-based curricula emphasizing ‘learning to learn’ methodologies THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Weak national innovation systems • Low production and mobility of PhDs and post-docs • Inward orientation of university researchers • Lack of incentives to commercialize research and solve real-life problems • Red tape impeding partnerships and cross-sectoralmobility THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS Source: IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2003
Potential actions • Improve graduate education in areas of high importance to the economy • Establish programs for the insertion of doctoral students and young researchers into industry • Strengthen ties between universities and industry by promoting cooperative research • Provide incentives for universities to commercialize innovations • Promote the participation in international knowledge and research networks THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Financing tertiary education Investments in tertiary 2.5% education, 1999 • Strong market for tertiary education • Comparatively low level of public funding • Risk of volatility and inadequate attention to public priorities and national needs 2.0% 1.5% % of GDP 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% USA Chile Brazil OECD Mexico Argentina Colombia THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS Public subsidies Private sources Total Source: OECD (2002) and World Bank (2002)
Potential actions • Create a transparent market for tertiary education, e.g. by supporting accreditation, the collection of data on labor market outcomes, and monitoring & evaluation • Link public resource allocation directly with objective performance and outcome criteria through performance based funding agreements (contracts) for core budget • Competitive grants for investment and innovation allocations THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Foreign Studentsenrollment, source OECD 2003 THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Foreign Students% of enrollment, Source OECD 2003 THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Brain DrainSource: Wodon (2003) THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Balance in International Mobility? • Foreign trained physicians: US-- 27%, Australia -- 21.4% , Canada -- 20%, Switzerland 19.1%, 12.6% UK • Overseas trained nurses per year in UK: 1998 -- 3,621, 1999 -- 5945……., 2004 -- 15,064 THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Potential actions • prioritize internationalization at the political agenda, and develop a proactive internationalization agenda • aim at balance in exchange of students and knowledge workers by attracting foreign students or skilled nationals from abroad, including from within the region • develop adequate strategies for LA countries to reap the full benefits of the GATS THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS
Universities in the bulls eye thanks for the invitationrektor@au.dk THE UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS