1 / 5

Update on: draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-00.txt

Update on: draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-00.txt. Adrian Farrel - adrian@olddog.co.uk Daniel King - dan@dnni.com Thomas D. Nadeau - tnadeau@cisco.com Seisho Yasukawa - yasukawa.seisho@lab.ntt.co.jp. Summary of Draft.

vala
Download Presentation

Update on: draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-00.txt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update on:draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-oam-reqs-00.txt Adrian Farrel - adrian@olddog.co.uk Daniel King - dan@dnni.com Thomas D. Nadeau - tnadeau@cisco.com Seisho Yasukawa - yasukawa.seisho@lab.ntt.co.jp 63rd IETF Paris August 2005

  2. Summary of Draft • Highlights the requirements to detect, handle and diagnose control and data plane defects in point-to-multipoint MPLS networks: • Requested by SPs • Addresses OAM & SLA requirements • Follow-on from P2P MPLS LSP OAM Requirements • The requirements apply to all forms of P2MP MPLS LSPs, including: • P2MP Traffic Engineered (TE) LSPs • Multicast LSPs • Primary use of the draft is the continued development of P2MP MPLS specifications 63rd IETF Paris August 2005

  3. Major Points • New draft, first release • The requirements described in P2P MPLS LSP OAM Reqs. are not repeated in this document • Initially the draft incorporates feedback from SPs, soon to add mailing list feedback 63rd IETF Paris August 2005

  4. Current Items • Continued development of the draft • Improving/clarifying points • Adding new sections as necessary • Potential overlap with the P2P MPLS LSP OAM Req. draft • Decided not to merge I-Ds so that main OAM draft could complete WG and move forward • P2MP OAM requirements likely to take some more time 63rd IETF Paris August 2005

  5. Next Actions • WG requested this draft • Make it a WG draft? • Identify areas that need to be added or improved • Please make suggestions on the mailing list • Issue next version of draft • Add mailing list feedback • Continue to poll SPs who have/plan to deploy P2MP MPLS networks 63rd IETF Paris August 2005

More Related