150 likes | 156 Views
This report summarizes the outcomes of the ASAS Thematic Network's second workshop held in Malmö in October 2003. It explores the expectations, benefits, costs, implications, impact, and inter-operation and safety aspects of ASAS applications. The report highlights the need for stakeholder commitment, agreed standards, and a clear implementation plan for the successful realization of ASAS operational improvements.
E N D
ASAS Thematic NetworkFirst Workshop Outcome Eric Hoffman 6-8th October Malmö ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
WS 1 Overview ASAS Operational improvements: Dream or Reality? Roma, 28th to 30th 2003 63 Attendees Report published June 28th 2003 ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
WS 1 Structure • Day 1 • Welcome • ASAS TN Overview • Workshop Objectives • Operational applications enabled by ADS-B • Key Players expectations ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
WS1 Structure • Day 2 • Benefits • Cost/implications • Impact • Inter-operation and Safety • Day 3 • Wrap up ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
Plenary Session What are the expectations from the main players? • Chris North (EC DGTREN) • Pieter van der Kraan (EUROCONTROL) • Nicolas Zveguintzoff (IATA) • Bo Redeborn (LFV) ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
Plenary Session • Need to get airports and airlines more involved. • Get full commitment • Implementation time lines are too long. • Too many things are going on separately. • USA/European cooperation – R&D sufficient? ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
Benefits Operational needs, lessons learned, expected benefits, overall maturity and potential implementation timeframe. • Juergen Lauterbach (Lufthansa) • Graeme Clark (Easyjet) • Pedro Rastrilla (AENA) • Alain Printemps (CENA) ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
Benefits • A large number of potential benefits were identified: • ASAS Spacing most promising application for the short term; • Airport enhanced surveillance could improve the safety and efficiency. • A number of concerns were highlighted: • Sharing of responsibilities, Controller acceptability, Safety Case • Need for reference operational concepts • Competing enabling technologies (1090 vs. VDL Mode 4) • Business case paramount ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
Costs/Implications Implications of ASAS applications on ground/ airborne systems, training communication, infrastructure, and the ‘associated costs’. • Pieter van der Kraan (EUROCONTROL) • Peter Howlett (THALES ATM) • Thomas Fixy (Airbus) • Patrick Souchu (DGAC) ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
Costs/Implications • Early implementation is essential • Further work is needed for Standards and CBA • We should mandate Package 1 and focus on subset Application to reduce timetable • 1090ES is not the answer but is going to happen, a study for the up-link is needed ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
Impact Expected impact of ASAS on workload, safety, and responsibility for the human operators • Uwe Kroger (IFALPA and VC) • Anthony Smoker (IFATCA) • Bengt Moberg (SAS) • Roberto Barchitta (Alitalia) ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
Impact • Lack of knowledge concerning what ASAS • Willingness to be involved by IFALPA, IFATCA and ATCEU • Trust - both technical and managerial issues • Package 1 may not be ambitious enough/ paradigm shift • Learn from experience in “parallel worlds” and use the safety case ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
Inter-operation / Safety Change the environment, delays, standards, military, ATC sectors, single sky. Transition aspects. Mix equipage environment. Time scales. Interoperability • Alberto Pasquini (Deep Blue) • Jose Roca (EUROCONTROL) • Ronald van Gent (NLR) • Martin Robinson- (IAOPA) ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
Inter-operation / Safety • General • Need to disseminate/coordinate better • Still a need to avoid the capacity gridlock • Maturity • Validation required • Integration with existing systems • Mixed equipage • Equipage rate • Transition • Mandate • Safety benefits • Mode S elementary surveillance • Incentive ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö
Conclusions • Need for agreement and commitment from the various stakeholders • Package 1 definition exists but fragile • Need for pilot and controller acceptability • Need for agreed standards for interoperability • Need for a clear implementation plan • Need for improved exchange of information ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö