1 / 28

FROM PILOT TO REGULAR SURVEYS : THE COSTS ASPECTS Aneta GALCA Mihaela BORCAN

FROM PILOT TO REGULAR SURVEYS : THE COSTS ASPECTS Aneta GALCA Mihaela BORCAN. Stages of the survey. Establish the survey indicators: Quantity of seed treated Area sown with treated seeds Quantity of pesticides used Treated area Number of treatments Quantity of solution.

varsha
Download Presentation

FROM PILOT TO REGULAR SURVEYS : THE COSTS ASPECTS Aneta GALCA Mihaela BORCAN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FROM PILOT TO REGULAR SURVEYS:THE COSTS ASPECTSAneta GALCAMihaela BORCAN 2

  2. Stages of the survey Establish the survey indicators: Quantity of seed treated Area sown with treated seeds Quantity of pesticides used Treated area Number of treatments Quantity of solution 2

  3. Stages of the survey • Drawing up the questionnaire • Chapter 1 – General information on the agricultural holding • Location of the agricultural holding • Legal form of the agricultural holding • General information on the cultivation system: • sowing date • cultivated plot area • utilised agricultural area - wheat, fertilised wheat, irrigated wheat, crops under rotation, previous plant, wheat grain norm per Ha, wheat grain quantity used for sowing • Chapter 2 – Treatment of seeds before sowing • Trade name of the pesticide used • Treated seed purchased – seed quantity, dose, total quantity • Area sown with treated seeds 2

  4. Stages of the survey • Drawing up the questionnaire • Chapter 3 – Crop treatment with pesticides • Trade name of the pesticide used • Dosage applied • Total quantity • Treated area • Number of treatments • Data of application • Chapter 4 – Other plant health protection measures and their efficiency • Application of an integratedplant disease and pest prevention strategy 2

  5. Stages of the survey • Elaboration of the methodological guide • Instructions to fill in the questionnaire • Nomenclatures • Drawing up the sample: • 4000 agricultural holdings • 1839 individual holdings • 2161 legal units • Threshold applied >= 5 Ha cultivated area with wheat 2

  6. Stages of the survey • Establish the requirements for the IT application • Elaboration of the IT application • Surveyors selection • Training of the surveyors • Field data collection (face-to-face interview) • Data processing at central level: • data collection • validation (corrections, automatic corrections) • data extension • final tables 2

  7. Future stages Data analysis: with the specialists from Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) with other administrative sources and research institutes Elaboration of the final report 2

  8. From pilot survey to regular survey Results • Total cultivated area: 2,000,000 Ha • Cultivated area with treated seed: 80 % of the total • Treated area: 75 % of the total • Average quantity of seed utilised for sowing: 240 Kilos/Ha • Quantity of plant protection products, active substance: • Together with sowing: 0,20 Kilos active substance/ Ha • Utilised during vegetation: 0,16 Kilos active substance/ Ha 2

  9. From pilot survey to regular survey Results Seeds treatment (active substance) • Tebuconozole: 27 % • Difenoconozole: 25 % • Diniconzole: 18 % • Thiram: 16 % • Cypermetrin: 11 % • Others: 3 % 2

  10. From pilot survey to regular survey Results Utilised plant protection products with one active substance – reason of the treatment • Tebuconazole (0,02 Kilos active substance) for: • Tilletia spp. • Pyrenophora graminis • Ustilago nuda • Difenoconazole (0,03 Kilos active substance) for: • Tilletia • Fusarium species • Fusarium nivale 2

  11. From pilot survey to regular survey Results Utilised plant protection products with two active substances – reason of the treatment • Difenoconazole (0,03 Kilos active substance) for: • Tilletia species • Ciproconazole (0,06 Kilos active substance) for: • Fusarium species • Ustilago nuda 2

  12. From pilot survey to regular survey Results Utilised plant protection products with two active substance – reason of the treatment • Tebuconazole (0,015 Kilos active substance) for: • Tilletia species • Thiram (0,50 Kilos active substance) for: • Fusarium species 2

  13. From pilot survey to regular survey Results Utilised plant protection products with two active substances – reason of the treatment • Diniconazole (0,015 Kilos active substance) for: • Tilletia species • Carbendazim (0,50 Kilos active substance) for: • Fusarium species 2

  14. From pilot survey to regular survey Results Crop treatment – utilised substance Total active substance: 0,16 Kilos/Ha for crop 0,04 Kilos/Ha for seeds • Fungicides: 21 %, of which 49 % Carbendazim • Herbicides: 75 %, of which 80 % 2,4 D • Insecticides: 3,5 %, of which 28 % Dimethoate • Average number of treatments: 2,3 • Dosage applied: 100 % of the recommended dosage • Average water volume applied: 250 l/Ha 2

  15. From pilot survey to regular survey Results Main utilised substances and the reason of their application (diseases) Fungicides: • Thiophanate methyl for Erysyphe graminis • Thiabendazole for Septoria tritici • Difenoconazole for Puccinia species • Tebuconazole for Fusarium species • Others for Puccinia recondita 2

  16. From pilot survey to regular survey Results Main utilised substances and the reason of their application (diseases) Herbicides: • 2,4 D for Wild-growing plant • Chlorosulfuron for Cirsium arvensis • Metasulfuron for Souchus arvensis • Amidosulfuron for Chenopodium album • Others for Thalspi arvense and Raphanus spp. 2

  17. From pilot survey to regular survey Results Main utilised substances and the reason of their application (pests) Insecticides: • Thiametoxan (0,250 K a.s.) for Eurygaster integriceps • Chlorphyrifos methyl (0,48 K a.s.) for Lema melanopa and Zabrus tenebriodes • Dimethoate (0,4 K a.s.) for Eurygaster species • Cypermethrin (0,3 K s.a.) for Agriotis species, Anisoplia species and Haplodiplotis marginata 2

  18. From pilot survey to regular survey Problems for updating the sample base (crops rotation system) back up sample for surveyors employment special training needed non stimulated payment 2

  19. From pilot survey to regular survey When ? after the coming into force of the Regulation (2010 – 2013) How ? following the stages of Phare 2005, by groups and zones of crops Who ? National Institute of Statistics with the Ministry of Agriculture andRural Development, the Ministry of Interns and Administrative Reform (local administrations) 2

  20. From pilot survey to regular survey Preparing activities • Phare MB 2002 and 2005 pilot project; transition facility 2008: • pesticides statistics employed on the market • collaboration protocols with Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, the Ministry of Interns and Administrative Reform for pesticides issue - selection of the target population by asking within the questionnaire for crop production, fodder, vegetables, flowers of certain questionsregarding the use of pesticides • establishing the crop list • establishing the necessary financial resources 2

  21. From pilot survey to regular survey Drawing up the sample Crop list – selection criteria • Cultivated area • Grains production, fruits, vegetables and fodders • Quantity of utilised pesticides – Kilos/ Ha • Typology and Economic size of the holding • Number of holdings • Crop specific (weight of crop in holding type)– fruit trees, vegetables and vine are frequently cultivated in households • Soil and climatic conditions – water melons are cultivated on sandy soils; sugar beat is cultivated in cold zones • Crop rotation system • Area utilisation • Resources 2

  22. 2

  23. 2

  24. 2

  25. 2

  26. From pilot survey to regular survey Costs evaluation evaluation criteria: representativity level national level region level number of crops 2

  27. From pilot survey to regular survey Costs evaluation for 2012 survey 2

  28. From pilot survey to regular survey Costs evaluation for 2012 survey- next 2

More Related