390 likes | 401 Views
Day 10. opic (of the talk). mportance (of the topic to the audience ). peaker’s. ualifications. ame (of speaker). Modular Talk. Opening Cultural Claim Spiritual Need Scripture End Result Organisational Distinctives Is it Worth It All? Close. Spider Method. List Method.
E N D
opic (of the talk) mportance (of the topic to the audience) peaker’s ualifications ame (of speaker)
Modular Talk • Opening • Cultural • Claim • Spiritual Need • Scripture • End Result • Organisational Distinctives • Is it Worth It All? • Close
List Method Subject: Time: A. I. C. D. C.
Making decisions Have you ever been in a meeting where there was a real need to make a decision, but the group found it difficult to come to a consensus?
Reaching the best solution Can you think of a situation where there have been a number of options and you wondered how to decide on the best possible solution?
6-Step Decision-Making Model: State the situation. Get the facts. Establish criteria.(negotiables + non-negotiables) List the alternatives. Weigh alternatives against criteria. Limit the debate to criteria that points to the solution.
Step 1. State the Situation I need to buy a motorbike.
Step 2. Get the facts (as many relevant facts as possible). Motors from 50cc to 1500cc Prices range from 400€ to 20.000€ Some allow two people to ride Some come with a security system Some have an electric starter With used bikes, the tires can be practically new to worn out—they will need to be replaced soon Bikes come in a variety of colours
Step 3. Establish the criteria Not all have the same importance. Negotiable Non-negotiable This is the key part of the process! You want to think twice before making things “non-negotiable.”
Establishing my/our criteria: Non-negotiables: Cost: No more than 1.000€ Extra seat Cargo carrier Good headlight Security (way to lock/secure it) Negotiables: Good tires (not expensive) Top speed: 60 kph Colour: Blue Electric start
Step 4. List the alternatives Kawasaki Honda BMW Yamaha Generic Local Brand
Absolutes - non-negotiable: Desirables - negotiable: A L T E R N A T I V E S Criteria 1.000€ 2 seats cargo head security good 60 kph blueelectric carrierlighttires start Kawasaki Honda BMW Yamaha Generic Brand
Step 5. Weigh … …the alternatives against the criteria.
Absolutes - non-negotiable: Desirables - negotiable: A L T E R N A T I V E S Criteria 1.000€ 2 seats cargo head security good 60 kph blueelectric carrierlight tires starter Kawasaki 800 + + + + - - - + Honda 1,500 - + + + + + + + BMW 2,200 + + + + + + - + Yamaha 750 + - + - + - - - Generic 450 - + - - + - + -
Step 6. Limit the debate Stick to what you decided before! Especially when it comes to what was going to be negotiable and non-negotiable. This saves you from heated emotional debates!
Before the discussion we always need to pray.We need the Lord to give us wisdom!
Following this process becomes a team-building exerciseWe do it together!
6-Step Decision-Making Model: State the situation. Get the facts. Establish criteria.(negotiables + non-negotiables) List the alternatives. Weigh alternatives against criteria. Limit the debate to criteria that points to the solution.
Six Steps to Decision-Making Step 1: State the Situation “I need to buy a motorbike.”
Six Steps to Decision-Making Step 2: Get the Facts • There are several possible bikes. Each offers a different combination of things: • Good Tires • Cargo Carrier • Blue • Security System • Price • Electric Start
Six Steps to Decision-Making Step 3: Establish the Criteria
Six Steps to Decision-Making Step 4: List the alternatives
Six Steps to Decision-Making Step 5: Weigh Alternatives against Criteria
Six Steps to Decision-Making Step 5: Weigh Alternatives against Criteria
Six Steps to Decision-Making Step 5: Weigh Alternatives against Criteria
Six Steps to Decision-Making Step 5: Weigh Alternatives against Criteria
Six Steps to Decision-Making Step 6: Limit debate to the criteria which points to a solution
Six Steps to Decision-Making State the Issue List the Facts Establish the Criteria (Negotiables/Non- Negotiables) List Alternatives Weigh Alternatives against criteria (+/-) Limit debate to the criteria which points to the solution