1 / 30

Managing Difficult Employees Workshop: Strategies and Legal Insights

Learn to identify, handle, and resolve challenging behaviors in the workplace effectively while understanding legal duties and procedures. Explore intervention opportunities and strategies.

veit
Download Presentation

Managing Difficult Employees Workshop: Strategies and Legal Insights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Peter Forshaw Partner DDI: 0151 242 7935 peter.forshaw@weightmans.com Andy Halpin Solicitor DDI: 0151 242 6949 andy.halpin@weightmans.com Difficult Employees 10th November 2015

  2. Learning objectives • By the end of the session the delegate will be able to: • Identify the types of ‘difficult behaviour’ commonly experienced in the workplace; • Appreciate the impact such behaviours can have on individual and fellow-staff morale, safety and productivity; • Understand the legal duties on both employers and staff in respect of their behaviour in the workplace; • Review the skills and strategies which can be deployed to tackle such behaviour, including tips on how to manage ‘difficult conversations’ and deploy internal policies and procedures effectively.

  3. Agenda • What does ‘challenging behaviour’ look like? • Opportunities for intervention • Using Internal procedures effectively • Performance or conduct: Which route to take? • Any other options? • Tackling Multiple Grievances • Towards the Exit • ‘Protected’ Conversations • Negotiating Settlement • What will it cost?

  4. ‘Challenging Behaviour’ • Failure to respond to reasonable requests and instructions • Demotivated and unproductive • Constant complaints/serial grievances • ‘Stirring’ discontent – encouraging other employees to raise claims? • Failure to ‘get-along’ with team/damaging team dynamic • Intimidating or upsetting team members • Saps management time and emotional energy

  5. The impact on business • Management time • Morale of staff • Consistency of approach • Impact on clients and customers

  6. Opportunities for Intervention • 1:2:1 Meetings • Team Meetings • Assert or reiterate behavioural standards • Facilitated meeting with line manager and HR? • Appraisals • Include contribution to/impact on team as criterion? • Avoids ‘difficult’ employee being singled out • Formal dispute resolution – e.g. mediation? • A formal internal process; conduct/capability?

  7. Opportunities for Intervention Mediation • Independently facilitated process • Who should the mediator be? • Intense and concentrated focus on the problem (whole day or more) • Flexible: Mediator can adapt procedure to suit parties • Allows for ‘creative’ solutions • Confidential and without prejudice • Excellent success rate

  8. Beware of Discrimination • If the employee ‘just doesn’t fit’ – Is there a reason? • Is there a root cause behind apparent poor performance? • Protected characteristics under the Equality Act? In particular consider: • Race/religion or belief? • Any religious/social/cultural factors that might inform employee’s behaviour? • Disability Discrimination • Any conditions that impede communication/social interaction?

  9. Dismissal – The Legal Basics • Employment Rights Act 1996 – s98 • Five potentially fair dismissal reasons: • Conduct • Capability and qualifications • Redundancy • Breach of Statutory Restriction • Some other Substantial Reason (SOSR) • For employer to establish reason or principal reason

  10. Using Internal Procedures Capability or Conduct? • Early and pro-active application of internal procedures is key • Can be difficult decision • Often Significant overlap – Skill vs Will • Choose at early stage and apply process rigorously • Don’t ‘muddle’ conduct and capability • Belief in ultimate dismissal reason must be ‘genuinely held’ - which process do you instinctively feel is appropriate? • Most important factor is that a fair procedure is followed

  11. Applying Procedures Effectively Conduct – Some Key Considerations ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary Cases Employer must establish that: • conduct was the actual / principal reason for dismissal • it had reasonable grounds (evidence) upon which to believe that the employee was guilty of misconduct • it adopted a fair procedure (e.g. when gathering/reviewing the evidence, and giving the employee an opportunity to comment) • that it was reasonable in all the circumstances to dismiss • S98(4) – Nature of the business will be considered

  12. Applying Procedures Effectively Conduct – Some key Considerations • Consider the employee’s existing disciplinary record • Previous warnings about unacceptable behaviour? • ‘Phased’ process more likely to be fair for persistent minor misconduct • Investigation • ‘Without unreasonable delay’ – ACAS Code • How much investigation is required? • Evidence and witnesses • Reluctant Witnesses • Third Party/Customer complaints

  13. Applying Procedures Effectively Capability – Some Key Considerations • ACAS Code of Practice does not strictly apply – but may provide useful framework • Probationary Periods – Useful tool for ‘difficult’ individuals • Evidence is key: • Document appraisals and important conversations • What does the last appraisal say? • Have you offered appropriate support/training/behavioural feedback? • ‘Staged’ process with opportunity to improve most likely to be fair • Clear and measurable objectives

  14. Any Other Options? • Reorganisation or restructure: • To place ‘difficult’ employee in redundancy position or lower profile role • Very drastic measure • Take legal advice – fraught with risk! • SOSR Dismissal: • Where employee behaviour genuinely does not fit into ‘performance’ or ‘conduct’ box

  15. SOSR Dismissal • Approach with caution! • May potentially be suitable for: • Breakdown in trust and confidence • Reputational risk • Conflict of interest • Personality clashes • Other reasons that aren’t really ‘conduct’ and aren’t really ‘capability’ • Cite your specific reasoning • SOSR is not a ‘short-cut’ – Fair process must still be followed

  16. Tackling Multiple Grievances – Do’s • Treat every grievance separately • Avoid forming an opinion based on ‘history’ • Document meetings and decision in detail • Make sure you comply with the ACAS Code of Practice • Avoid ‘truncated’ procedure except by agreement • Consider Mediation • Think creatively: What interventions might break the cycle? • Be very wary of victimisation • Woodhouse v North West Homes Ltd • Legally irrelevant whether allegations have merit • Think very carefully before alleging bad faithand or dismissing

  17. Tackling Multiple Grievances: Don’ts • ‘Jump’ straight into formal grievance procedure • Would an informal conversation help? • Is answer clear from workplace policy? • Hear grievances regarding application of policies with ‘inbuilt’ appeals (e.g. conduct/attendance) • Re-open ‘old’ issues • Be distracted by ‘red-herrings’ • Allow employee to dictate the terms • Consider objections but ‘stick by’ your decisions

  18. Termination by Settlement: Framework A ‘muddle’ of terminology! • ‘Without prejudice conversations’ : Long-standing rule • Pre-termination negotiations – Introduced 2013 • Compromise Agreements now ‘Settlement Agreements’ • Without prejudice principle still relevant?

  19. Without Prejudice • Common law principle • Statements made in genuine attempt to settle existing dispute • Not admissible as evidence • Not protected if “unambiguous impropriety”

  20. Pre –Termination Negotiations • Conversations about parting on mutually agreed terms. • Content of discussions will be inadmissible in ET proceedings • No existing dispute necessary • Improved freedom for frank discussions • Applicable to unfair dismissal claims only NOT discrimination • Protection lost if any ‘improper behaviour’ • Key requirements – ACAS Code of Practice

  21. What is improper behaviour? • ‘Improper behaviour’ is a matter for the ET • Non-Exhaustive list of examples in ACAS Code of Practice • ‘Improper behaviour’ can include: • Harassment, bullying or intimidation • Offensive words or aggressive behaviour • Physical assault or the threat of physical assault • All forms of victimisation • Discrimination on the grounds of any protected characteristic • Putting ‘undue pressure’ on a party – e.g. insufficient time to consider offer

  22. Pre-Termination Negotiations Exercise Caution! • Always bear in mind that confidentiality may be lifted by Tribunal even if you’ve stated ‘without prejudice’ or s111A conversation • Employee need only allege discrimination for confidentiality to be dis-applied • Don’t say anything you wouldn’t want ET to hear!

  23. Having the Difficult Conversation • Plan meeting • Prepare what to say • Be fully aware of contents of offer and reasons • Introduce offer ‘gently’ – avoid ‘bolt from the blue’ • Consider possible responses/behaviours • Use appropriate questions • Listen actively • Check understanding, confirm next steps • Always have a Plan B! • What will you say if employee refuses?

  24. Pre-Termination Negotiations: ‘Step by Step’ • Step 1: Approach employee to discuss issue • E.g. performance, conduct, employee appears unhappy etc. • Explain you would like to explore exit on agreed terms • Explain that, where appropriate, the alternative is commencing a formal process • Step 2: Is Employee interested in settlement? • Yes – Offer formal written terms • No – Explanatory letter offering opportunity to reconsider

  25. Pre–Termination Negotiations: ‘Step by Step’ • Step 3: Time to think • Employer must have ‘reasonable period’ to consider offer • ACAS Code of Practice suggests at least 10 days • Step 4: Does Employee wish to Accept? • If No: Back off! Trigger formal procedure if appropriate

  26. Pre–Termination Negotiations: ‘Step by Step’ • Step 5: Settlement Agreement • If Employee wishes to proceed provide ‘settlement agreement’ documenting the terms • Seek legal advice to draw up/review agreement • Employee must take independent legal advice on implications of signing • Step 6: Move on in confidence? • If no ‘improper behaviour or allegation of discrimination content of conversation cannot be raised at ET in event employee does not sign settlement agreement

  27. At Tribunal: What will it cost? • Cap on compensatory award for Unfair Dismissal – 52 weeks gross pay • ‘Overall’ cap of £78,335 • Basic award in addition: • Calculated like a statutory redundancy payment; • £14,250 maximum based on £475 week’s pay • Uncapped award where dismissal discriminatory • Median award for Unfair Dismissal as at June 2015 – circa £6,955

  28. At Tribunal: What will it cost? Other costs to consider • Costs can now be awarded against Respondents • Costs of conduct of the claim • Financial Penalties for losing employers A Pragmatic Approach? • Cap on compensation and low median awards may make ‘pragmatic’ approach worthwhile • Fewer claims…or just a greater likelihood of other claims like discrimination or whistle-blowing?

  29. Contact Details Andy Halpin Solicitor DDI: 0151 242 6949 andy.halpin@weightmans.com Follow the Weightmans Employment Team on Social Media: Twitter: @Weightmans_Empl LinkedIn: Weightmans Employment

  30. Learning objectives • Identify the types of ‘difficult behaviour’ commonly experienced in the workplace; • Appreciate the impact such behaviours can have on individual and fellow-staff morale, safety and productivity; • Understand the legal duties on both employers and staff in respect of their behaviour in the workplace; • Review the skills and strategies which can be deployed to tackle such behaviour, including tips on how to manage ‘difficult conversations’ and deploy internal policies and procedures effectively.

More Related