70 likes | 223 Views
The Advisory Role and the Gateway Engagement Process. Lila Clarke CoE June 2010. PGN 01/09 Sets out parameters for programmes and projects Summarises the role of the SRO Introduces the Successful Delivery Web Portal References best practice advice and guidance methods . PGN 03/09
E N D
The Advisory Role and the Gateway Engagement Process Lila Clarke CoE June 2010
PGN 01/09 Sets out parameters for programmes and projects Summarises the role of the SRO Introduces the Successful Delivery Web Portal References best practice advice and guidance methods PGN 03/09 Sets out de-minimus limits for application of Gateway infrastructure programmes and projects with a capital value of £20m or more; other programmes and projects with whole life total central government costs of £20m. Under £500k Over £500k but less than £20m Policieswww.dfpni.gov.uk/index/procurement-2/successful-delivery.htm
Risk Potential Assessment (RPA) • Profoma designed to provide an initial assessment of potential programme/project risk at key lifecycle points • Judgement and knowledge of the programme/project
Engagement Process • Low Risk • Medium Risk • High Risk • Healthcheck
Charging • CPD Introduced Charging on 1st April 2010 • High Risk Reviews = £19k or £12k • Medium Risk Reviews = £10k • Healthcheck = £6k • NI Team = £3.5k Charges apply Per Review (Note: prior to 1st April Reviews were subject to the cost of the external resource circa £1000+ per day)
Summary Three processes Low risk, Medium and High – • All Cases over £500k and under £20m threshold should be tested by completion of an RPA • Use of lite or strengthened QCT Reviews where appropriate • Gateway is mandatory for over £20m even if RPA is assessed as Low Risk • Use of Portfolio Leader • If in doubt contact CoE