1 / 19

Andy K. Valickis, P.Eng. Jim Shubat May 7, 2013

OWWA/OMWA Joint Annual Conference May 5 – 8, 2013 Ottawa, Ontario Killaloe Water System, AVIVE TM Water Treatment and Huwa-San Peroxide. Andy K. Valickis, P.Eng. Jim Shubat May 7, 2013. Problem. To find a cost effective solution to reduce the high level of THMs in the Killaloe Water System.

viveka
Download Presentation

Andy K. Valickis, P.Eng. Jim Shubat May 7, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. OWWA/OMWA Joint Annual ConferenceMay 5 – 8, 2013Ottawa, OntarioKillaloe Water System, AVIVETM Water Treatment andHuwa-San Peroxide Andy K. Valickis, P.Eng. Jim Shubat May 7, 2013

  2. Problem To find a cost effective solution to reduce the high level of THMs in the Killaloe Water System

  3. Killaloe Water System • Small system – only 90+ connections • Owned by the Township of Killaloe, Hagarty and Richards • Operated by OCWA • Groundwater wells • GUDI with in-situ filtration • Treatment for iron and manganese removal • UV discharging to clearwells • Long residency time in clearwells and distribution system (3 to 5 days) • THM levels near or over the 100 µg/L limit • Individual samples as high as 140 µg/L

  4. Solution • AVIVETM Water Treatment system from SanEcoTec • Using Huwa-San peroxide (HSP) New form of stabilized peroxide that maintains its residual (equivalent if not better than chlorine) • NSF approved as a residual for drinking water • Used successfully in Europe in drinking water since 2004 • Use HSP for secondary disinfection in the clearwells and distribution system • No chlorine to produce THMs

  5. Advantages of AVIVETM and HSP • Does not breakdown to form THMs or other chlorine based DBPs • Attacks biofilm on pipe walls • Very strong oxidizer • Longer lasting residual • Easy to use for operators • Similar to sodium hypochlorite • No chlorine taste in the drinking water • Significant consumer acceptance

  6. Project Approach • Met with MOE (regulators) • Essential to get their buy-in • Sold the concept to the Township staff and Council • Including our own operations staff • Numerous consultation meetings with MOE Approvals and Health Unit staff • Undertook baseline monitoring and sampling • Public notification

  7. Baseline Monitoring and Sampling • THM formation • Historical THM concentration data available but not where along the process are the majority of the THMs formed • Undertook jar testing to develop a baseline and confirm HSP works • ATP testing of the existing system • Baseline of microbial activity within distribution system • Undertaken over a number of weeks • Other testing • HPC, Total Coliform, E.Coli • Metals testing (copper, lead, iron, manganese) • Residential hot water systems

  8. ATP Testing - Luminultra • Measures Adenosine Triphosphate • A chemical found in living microorganisms • Quantitative indication of microbial activity in a sample • Results in 5 minutes • Indication of the amount of biofilm on pipe walls • Testing equipment loaned to this project by Luminultra • Sampling and testing undertaken by staff from OCWA and Fleming College’s CAWT

  9. System Design • Still need chlorine to achieve CT requirements • Chlorine added to incoming raw well water • Used residency time in contactor tanks and pipes (before UV) to achieve CT • HSP added immediately after UV system • Measure chlorine levels then adjust HSP dosing to quench chlorine + enough to maintain minimum secondary disinfection residual of 3 mg/L • With the quenching of the chlorine, THM formation immediately ceases • Issue of backwashing contactors with “peroxidated” water • Filter to waste until chlorine levels restored

  10. MOE Approvals • Regulatory Relief • Sections from O. Reg. 170/03 under the Safe Drinking Water Act • Amendment to the DWWP • Additional sampling and reporting for initial 3 months • Voluntary sampling (i.e. residential hot water systems)

  11. Equipment • Very similar to what is required for feeding and monitoring sodium hypochlorite • Chemical feed pumps (off the shelf) • Peroxide residual monitors (supplied by Kramer) • Handheld units for sampling in distribution system

  12. Results • HSP system was commissioned and went live in late November 2012 • Immediate THM reduction • Initially down to 25-27 µg/L range • Current levels are in the 20-23 µg/L range • HSP residuals maintained throughout the distribution system • Water quality during the changeover was not affected • HAAs were also significantly reduced • Before 55 to 67 µg/L range; after 8.4 µg/L

  13. HSP Residuals

  14. THM Reduction Post-HSP

  15. ATP Testing Results Pre-HSP Post-HSP

  16. Residential Hot Water Systems(Microbiological Activity) Pre-HSP Post-HSP Post-HSP

  17. Conclusions • Project a big success! • Significant reduction in the DBPs produced • Proved HSP can retain a disinfecting residual equivalent to or better than chlorine • Significant consumer acceptance of their “new” tap water • We finally have a viable alternative to chlorinating our water supplies

  18. Special Thanks

More Related