1 / 24

ShakeAlert Earthquake Early Warning Progress and Status

Stay informed on the progress and status of the ShakeAlert Earthquake Early Warning system. Learn about key collaborators, system architecture, funding, and outreach efforts. Get insights on the implementation process and partnerships.

vivianingram
Download Presentation

ShakeAlert Earthquake Early Warning Progress and Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ShakeAlert Earthquake Early WarningProgress and Status Doug GivenUSGS Earthquake Early Warning Coordinator • Primary Collaborators • USGS Given, D., Cochran, E., Oppenheimer, D. • State of California (Cal OES, CGS) Johnson, M., Parrish, J. • Caltech Heaton, T., Hauksson, E. • UC Berkeley Allen, R., Hellweg, P., Neuhauser, D. • U. of Washington Vidale, J., Bodin, P. • Swiss Seismological Service, ETHClinton, J., Behr, Y. • Moore Foundation Chandler, V., Koch, N. CISN Steering Cmte. Meeting Oct. 10, 2014

  2. UserDisplay – ShakeOut M7.8Real-time Finite Fault Solution

  3. UserDisplay – ShakeOut M7.8Real-time Finite Fault Solution

  4. UserDisplay – ShakeOut M7.8Real-time Finite Fault Solution

  5. UserDisplay – ShakeOut M7.8Real-time Finite Fault Solution

  6. ShakeAlert Plan Partners plan to complete & operate a the ShakeAlert EEW system to… • Issue public warningsfor large earthquakes and… • …send warning parameters to government and private sector users… • …as soon as ShakeAlert meets quality and reliability standards on a region by region basis • Authors • USGS - Given, D., Cochran, E. • CIT - Heaton, T., Hauksson, E. • UCB - Allen, R., Hellweg, P. • UW - Vidale, J., Bodin, P. Open-File Report 2014-1097

  7. CEEWS: Cal OES – Planning ProcessCA Code 8587.8: State Implementation Plan by 1/1/2016 “On the road toward a comprehensive earthquake early warning system, we will face some challenges. Fortunately the California Integrated Seismic Network provides us with the foundation for the system we envision.” - Mark Ghilarducci, Director, Cal OES

  8. ShakeAlert System Architecture • ShakeAlert in Californiais built on CISN • Leverages… • Stations • Telecommunications • Hardened centers • Software (EW, AQMS) • Expertise • Management structures • A new CISN product

  9. ShakeAlert: Major System Components Sensor Networks User Actions Processing Alert Creation Field telemetry Alert Delivery

  10. CEEWS/ShakeAlert Public - Private Partnership Model Waveforms Parameters Detections RT Data Value-added & Redistribution Services Direct Users Public Alert Systems (e.g. IPAWS) Partner Networks (seismic + GPS) Core System CEEWS/ShakeAlert Processing CISN Sensors (seismic + GPS) Red = public Blue= private Alert Streams • Alert streams • Alerts – simple, MMI threshold exceeded • Data feeds – per second, what earth is doing

  11. Investments in ShakeAlert(Through FY14) • Moore Foundation R&D (2012-2014) • Caltech $1,996,888 • UC Berkeley $2,040,889 • Univ. of Washington $1,848,351 • USGS $ 594,406 • TOTAL$6,480,534 USGS Earthquake Program (2002-2015) • External coops R & D for EEW • Phase I & II (2002-2012) $2,093,851 • Phase III (2012-2015) $1,575,000 • ARRA California (2009-2011) $4,426,110 • - Network equipment upgrades • MultiHazards Project (2008-2014) $2,342,150 TOTAL$10,437,111 • City of Los Angeles – UASI funding • To Caltech FY 14 (SCSN) $5,600,000-125 new & upgraded SCSN stations- 41 RT-GPS stations- System infrastructure upgrades • Future Federal Funding? • Base USGS budget includes $850,000 for EEW • Both House and Senate markups for FY15 include $5 million for EEW Total = $ 22.5 million

  12. ShakeAlert: Estimated Cost = + = + • New and upgraded seismic & GPS stations • New and upgraded field telemetry • System testing, certification and performance monitoring • Personnel for maintenance and operation (hardware & software) • Continued R & D • User supportand training Sensor Networks User Actions Processing Alert Creation Field telemetry Alert Delivery

  13. CISN Alert Shake California Integrated Seismic Network Progress Toward Public EEW • ShakeAlert Progress • 2006-2009 – R & D phase • Jan. 2012 – Demonstration System Live • 2015 – Production Prototype • 2015*– Limited Rollout • TDB* – Full Operation ShakeAlert Stations (9/2014) ~400 stations *Rollout schedule depends on funding levels

  14. Current ShakeAlert Beta Users • Amgen* • Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) • Boyd Gaming , Las Vegas, NV* • Cal OES, Warning Center • Caltrans (8 traffic mgmt. centers) • Caltech Safety/Security • Disneyland* • Google.org (crisis response)* • Los Angeles City, EMD, Police, Fire • Los Angeles Co. OEM, Sheriff, Fire • Los Angeles Metro (MTA) • Los Angeles Unified School District • Long Beach EOC, Fire, PD, Waste, Trans. • Long Beach Airport • Metrolink (dispatch) • Metropolitan Water District • Ontario City EOC • Port of Long Beach • Riverside County OEM/Fire • San Bernardino OEC/Fire • San Francisco DEM • San Francisco Fire Dept. • Southern California Edison* • UC Berkeley OEP • Universal Studios / NBC* • US Digital Designs, Inc.* • CRADA’s with: • Global Security Systems* • Early Warning Labs* * Private company

  15. PerformanceSpeed and Accuracy La Habra quake: M 5.1, March 28, 2014. 9:09 pm PDT South Napa quake: M 6.0, Aug. 24th, 2014. 3:20am PDT ShakeAlert Timeline 09:09:42.3 Origin time 09:09:43.3(+1.0s) 1st P-wave 09:09:46.3(+4.0s) 1st Alert ShakeAlert Timeline 10:20:44.4 Origin time 10:20:49.5 (+5.1s) 1st Alert Alert Shake • Upgraded stations would be faster • 4 stations required for alert • Size of “zone of no warning” depends on # stations required to alert Similar performance for: M4.4 Encino Event of March 17, 2014 M4.2 Westwood Event of June 2, 2014

  16. Demo  Production Prototype • Network upgrades, adding station • Upgrade of 125 SCSN stations completed (UASI funding) • Telemeter more CE and NP stations • Port EEW algorithms to CellWorm boxes (NP stations) • Production processing • Standard operating environment defined (Linux) • Six computers installed (NC, BK, CI) • System Testing & Certification • Testing process being defined, computers being installed • Standards being developed and test data gathered • Alerts • Developing code module to send CAP to IPAWS, FIA, etc. • Development by private partners (CRADAs) Alert Shake

  17. Test Implementation Projects San Francisco City • Putting UserDisplay in 47 fire stations • Possible private partner involvement Los Angeles City • Will propose automatic actions at 114 stations • Test in schools (LAUSD) • Possible private partner involvement • Private company demo’edat LA Co. FD Applications tolerant of false alerts

  18. CRADA - GSSNetsatellite delivery KLVE – Univison Broadcast area Alerts

  19. BSL Dir.Richard Allen CA State Sen. Jerry Hill CA State Sen. Alex Padilla SF MayorEd Lee Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom CalOES Dir. Mark Ghilarducci USGS Dir. Suzette Kimball

  20. Other ShakeAlert Developments • R & D continuing • Review tool available • Filter bank, ‘gut check’, system evaluation and tuning • RT-GPS - data standards being developed, 4 algorithms in development • Continued work on congressional support • Feinstein – Schiff OpEd, congressional hearings, ‘dear colleague’ letters • Possible $5M add-on in both House and Senate • Ironing out legal issues • Intellectual property (IP) • Private partner agreements • IPAWS Alert Authority completed • CEEWS activity Alert Shake

  21. Annualized Earthquake Losses66% in California, 77% on West Coast ShakeAlert only needs to prevent 0.4% of direct losses to be cost effective FEMA 366, April 2008

  22. Annualized Casualties by StateShakeAlert cost effective if it prevents ~8% of nighttime and ~2% of daytime fatalities FEMA 366, April 2008

  23. West Coast System Architecture Pacific Northwest • ShakeAlert is built on ANSS networks (CISN & PNSN) • Leverages… • Stations • Telecommunications • Hardened centers • Software (EW, AQMS) • Expertise • Management structures • A new CISN product Northern California Southern California

More Related