1 / 6

Developing a Valid Assessment Plan Comp 4.0 Piloted Fall 2007

Developing a Valid Assessment Plan Comp 4.0 Piloted Fall 2007. Stacey Stover and Patti Dungan Austin Community College March 18, 2008. Original Course 3 LEH for DEVW 1413 48 hours of instruction 3 LEH for ENGL 1301 1 LEH for Basic Study Skills --------------------------------

vivien
Download Presentation

Developing a Valid Assessment Plan Comp 4.0 Piloted Fall 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing a Valid Assessment PlanComp 4.0 Piloted Fall 2007 Stacey Stover and Patti Dungan Austin Community College March 18, 2008

  2. Original Course • 3 LEH for DEVW 141348 hours of instruction • 3 LEH for ENGL 1301 • 1 LEH for Basic Study Skills -------------------------------- 7 LEH Total Two 16-week courses and one 8-week course. *LEH = lecture equivalent hours. Redesigned Course • 1 LEH for DEVW 141116 hours of instruction • 3 LEH for ENGL 1301 -------------------------------- 4 LEH Total One 8-week course and one 16-week course.

  3. Our Challenge • To ensure that students enrolled our redesigned 1 LEH Writing Skills II (WSII) course are equally or better prepared as students enrolled in the traditional 3 LEH WSII course. • All WSII students are mandated to write a timed essay to exit the developmental writing program. Students are given three hours to write a persuasive essay.

  4. Pass/Fail Scale • Introduction (2 points) • _______ Hook-lead (A few sentences that introduce the topic and lead to thesis) • _______ Thesis statement, with or without essay map, clearly addresses the prompt. •  Body Paragraphs (12 points) • Par1 Par 2 Par 3 • _____ _____ _____ Topic sentence states one main idea which clearly contributes to the thesis. (3 points) • _____ _____ _____ Main idea is supported with explanation & at least one relevant example and/or other relevant elaboration. (3 points) • _____ _____ _____ Sentences are logically connected. (3 points) • _____ _____ _____ Main idea is further supported with (an) additional relevant example(s) and or other relevant elaboration. (3 points) Conclusion (2 points) • _______ A developed paragraph that sums up the argument. • Language (9 points)) • _____Three or fewer major errors (4 pts); four major errors (3 pts); five major errors (2 pts); six to seven major errors (1 pt); more than seven major errors (0 pts) • _____Five or fewer minor errors (4 pts); six or seven minor errors (3 pts); eight minor errors (2 pts); nine to ten minor errors (1 pts); more than 10 minor errors (0 pts). • _____Writer effectively constructs a variety of sentence types (1 point). • Error Checklist • Major Errors (mark one hash per error)Minor Errors (mark one hash per type of error) • _____comma splices ____commonly confused words on list (30) • _____fused sentences (run ons) _____apostrophe usage: possessives/contractions (2) • _____fragments ____comma usage: items in a series, coordination, introductory • _____subject-verb agreement clause or phrase, coordinate adjectives, transitional expressions (5) • _____verb tense consistency _____misuse/abuse of commas (1) • _____ sentence sense—has all of _____pronoun case/agreement/reference (3) • the elements of a sentence ____capitalization (1) • but doesn’t make sense _____ missing words or word endings: -ed, -s, -ing, ly (4) • _____ parallelism _____ESL issues: articles/prepositions/awkward wording (3) • _____other • Instructor’s initials _____

  5. Grading Session • Essays are graded by two faculty members, but faculty members do not grade their own students’ essays. • We calibrate about three times each semester to ensure accuracy. • Because this pilot started fall 2007, we do not have comparison data but preliminary numbers are promising.

  6. Questions? Austin Community College • Stacey Stoverstaceyt@austincc.edu • Patti Dungan padungan@austincc.edu

More Related