160 likes | 389 Views
Commonly Misspelled Words. Their, They’re, There. Their Belongs to a them (The teacher stole their M&M’s.) They’re - They are ( They’re the world’s best candies.) There – In that place; as an introductory adverb. ( There they are! There can never be enough M&M’s.). Two, Too, To.
E N D
Their, They’re, There • Their • Belongs to a them (The teacher stole their M&M’s.) • They’re - They are (They’re the world’s best candies.) • There – In that place; as an introductory adverb. (There they are! There can never be enough M&M’s.)
Two, Too, To • Two -The number (Two or three packages of M&M’s provide a nutritious after-school snack.) • Too -Also or more than enough (He, too, eats too many M&M’s.) • To - Preposition meaning “toward” or used with infinitive of a verb (I’m going to M&M heaven, where I’m going to eat many M&M’s.)
Your, You’re • Your -Belongs to a you (YourM&M’s are my M&M’s.) • You’re -You are (You’re in my power; hand over your M&M’s.)
Its, It’s • Its - Belongs to an it (The dog ate its M&M’s and wanted mine.) • It’s - It is (It’s that kind of day when I crave M&M’s.)
Who’s, Whose • Who’s Who's is short for who is or who has. (This is a 100% rule - it has no other uses.) If you can replace the word with who is or who has, use who's. If not, use whose. (Who’s eating my M&M’s? Who’s been eating my M&M’s?) • Whose is the possessive form of who. (Whose M&M’s are these?) Test: Who is M&M’s are these?
A lot, allot • A lot THERE IS NO SUCH WORD AS ALOT! Trust me. It is a two word expression for a large quantity. It is also not a rich sensory word. I can eat a lot of M&M’s. • allot is a verb which means to give out, divide, or distribute. (allots, allotted, allotting) All blue M&M’s will be allotted to me.
Supposively, Supposedly • Supposively, again—not a word. Spell check does not like it. • Supposedly-- allegedly, at a guess, by all accounts, hypothetically, presumably, purportedly, theoretically (Supposedly, someone wants to take away my M&M’s.)
Could of, Could have • Could of, does not exist in proper English. It is often misused, because when we use the contraction—Could’ve, it is slurred and audibly sounds as if we’re saying (orally) could-of. However, when we write could have—there is no “of”. • Could have/could’ve (I could have shared my M & M’s, but I’m too selfish.)
Top 10 Misspelled (By 6th graders) Words • mansion • language • restaurant • beginning • soldier • definitely • probably • instead • doesn’t • necessary