1 / 11

Production review

Production review. L. Ducimetière On behalf of: L . Sermeus, F. Castronuovo & FPS section. TE-ABT Production Review. Strategy to produce elements by type: Design & drawings Kicker magnets Module Feedthroughs Vacuum tank

wan
Download Presentation

Production review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Production review L. Ducimetière On behalf of: L. Sermeus, F. Castronuovo & FPS section

  2. TE-ABT Production Review Strategy to produce elements by type: Design & drawings Kicker magnets Module Feedthroughs Vacuum tank Generators and magnet auxiliaries (connection boxes, TMR, etc.) HV Cables and connectors Structural elements Strategy for maintenance Corrective Preventive Conclusion

  3. Design & drawings

  4. Kicker magnets

  5. Outline of project with the main deliverables Exemple : BE.KFA14L1 prepared by Luc * IT = Invitation to Tender, MS = Market Survey, FS = Functional Specification, ES = Engineering Specification, MP = Manufacturing Procedure, AP = Assembly Procedure

  6. Generators and magnet auxiliaries Specific case MKD : +/- 80 x upgrade GTO Switches Full procedure exists but request intermediate checks by staff Assemblyreallycritical for reliability Initial experienceunsuccessful Trigger transformers Still in prototype phase, sameremarks  Work with Bordereaux ?

  7. HV Cables and connectors, Structural elements

  8. Maintenance

  9. Conclusion For most of the activities, strong implication of: Staff FSU External subcontract (direct or via other CERN services) FSU work on Coreactivities (missing staff) Critical activitieswith - constant surveillance / control - CERN infrastructure (clean room, tools, .) Somerecurrentactivities to be move outside? Working with external contract is more difficult: Need full procedure and cannotimprove the processduringexecution No /difficultitermediatechecks More work to preparepriceenquiries Is working more with Bordereaux a good compromise ?

  10. Outline of project with the main deliverables BT.KFA10 * IT = Invitation to Tender, MS = Market Survey, FS = Functional Specification, ES = Engineering Specification, MP = Manufacturing Procedure, AP = Assembly Procedure

More Related