Governance Innovation for Security and Development (GISD)
0 likes | 134 Views
Governance Innovation for Security and Development (GISD). Interim Program Report 30 Sept – 30 Dec 2013 Karen Guttieri, Principal Investigator. Motivation. Civil Affairs are…
Governance Innovation for Security and Development (GISD)
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentationDownload Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Governance Innovation for Security and Development (GISD)
Interim Program Report 30 Sept – 30 Dec 2013 Karen Guttieri, Principal Investigator
Motivation Civil Affairs are… “the vanguard of DoD’s support to U.S. government efforts to assist partner governments in the fields of rule of law, economic stability, governance, public health and welfare, infrastructure, and public education and information” (US Quadrennial Defense Review Report2010 ) highly-valued in US foreign and defense policy under-valued as strategic assets in planning/operations divided and neglected (Lamont memo) “Functional specialties” are… flawed – the system of classifying and managing needs reworking (RAND) to be reformed as new Military Occupational Specialty – 38G
Governance Innovation for Security and Development (GISD) is… …a research project that seeks solutions to the challenges of supporting governance in fragile environments. GISD aims to develop a framework to promote peace and well-being through good governance—provision of essential services, political moderation and accountability, stewardship of state resources, and civic participation and empowerment. GISD researchers address current issues and trends in stability sectors—social well-being, promotion of safe and secure environments, stable governance, rule of law, sustainable economies and infrastructure, and homeland integration—and the competencies needed when the military is called upon to support to civilians in those sectors.
Statement of Work: Research Establish cross-disciplinary team and outreach Produce reviews of military governance, stability sectors, and homeland integration SupportIMSG professionalization of Civil Affairs / 38G classifications Identify educational needs Considercontext, behavior, info and technological enablers of peace and stability operations Final Report due 20 Aug 2014 GISD - Project Concept FOCUS
Primary Sponsor Point of contact: IMSG The Institute for Military Support to Governance (IMSG) manages the provision of civil sector expertise across the range of military operations in order to support USG obligations under international law and promote stability. On order, supports Theater Security Cooperation, Transitional Military Authority, and Support to Civil Administration operations. BG Hugh Van Roosen, Director
GISD Sector Leads / Key Colleagues 38G Marc Ventresca Tony Vacha Tech/Behavior Curt Blais Margarita Quihuis Mark Nelson Homeland Integration Melanne Civic Margalynne Armstrong OTJAG Jon Czarnecki NWC Team- USMA Paula Philbin Marc Ventresca Maria Pineda Peter Walker Tufts Maria Pineda Marc Ventresca UCLA/Notre Dame Karen Guttieri Charles Palmares Herman Semes Stanford Program Karen Guttieri, PI Curt Blais Charles Palmares
Collaborative Sites Established Internal team website: GISD Google site* Team calendar Project updates To-do list Reference documents – doctrine, etc. Collaborative documents – meeting notes, etc. Public info website: GISD site PublicGISD Research Site NPS Library GISD Refworks Site - bibliographies New -- GISD Community in All Partners Access Network (APAN) * Google sites are private (controlled access list).
GISD Meetings 1: Convened Weekly Team Meetings Design Meeting 17-18 Oct 2013 Video Teleconference- 351 CACOM/Fort Bragg, Stanford Added review of military governance per se; Initiated lit review protocol Consensus on stability sectors Analysis of Civil Affairs mission Interim Program Review 5-6 Nov 2013* Fort Bragg, NC Human behavior / field lab / Initiated 38G classifications New occupational specialty 38G problem analysis Persuasive Tech and Field Lab Network concepts Interim Program Review 16-19 Dec 2013* Naval Postgraduate School and Stanford University Social well-being, Rule of law, Governance panels/presentations *additional beyond statement of work
GISD Meetings 2: Planned Interim Program Review* 14-15 January 2014: Rule of Law / Gov (DC) Sector Reviews 29-30 March 2014: Social Well-Being / Economy (DC) 22-23 April 2014: Governance (UCLA)** 13-15 May 2014: Security (West Point) 3-5 June 2014: Rule of Law (NPS) ** * 17-18 June 2014: Homeland Integration (NPS or DC) *additional beyond statement of work **proposed change to be confirmed ***proposed to coincide with certificate course
GISD Meetings 3: PSOTEW DoD+ Conference* 24-28 March 2014: (GMU) GSID research team will host two full days of panels One of three official Working Groups (WG) Based on a proposal submitted by the PI Reaching wide community of scholars and practitioners *additional beyond statement of work
GISD Outreach - Sample Atlantic Council Caerus Assoc. Civ-Mil Working Group* Centre for the Democratic Control of the Armed Forces (DCAF) Geneva Centre for Security Policy George Mason University Institute for State Effectiveness JAG School National Defense University NATO Naval War College Notre Dame PKSOI PSOTEW Stakeholders* *umbrella organizations Stanford University Center for Deliberative Democracy Center for Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law Law School Peace Innovation Lab State Partnership Program TJAG Tufts University UCLA UNDPKO University of Geneva US Military Academy USAID US Dept of State CSO USARC World Economic Forum
Requirements across: Theater Security Cooperation Support to Civil Authority Transitional Military Authority 38A and 38G: Not clear 38A capable of organizing 38G 38A tactically focused Categorization: Too broad categories will not discriminate Too narrow categories will leave empty cells 38G Concept: Preliminary Analysis
Comments / Questions? Karen Guttieri Global Public Policy Academic Group Naval Postgraduate School Guttieri@nps.edu 831-869-5275