380 likes | 394 Views
This article explores the challenges of building an online news site that strives for accurate journalism while also aiming to rank high in search engine optimization (SEO). It discusses the use of popular website platforms like WordPress, compares different news sites' layouts and strategies, and examines the advantages and disadvantages of online news. The article also delves into the responsibilities and risks associated with citizen journalism.
E N D
What is a news site trying to do? • It’s trying to be an online version of a newspaper – which should be about good accurate journalism. Human eyes • It’s trying to be ‘on the front page of Google’ (whatever that means) – which is about SEO. Robot eyes • How do you reconcile those two?
Amateur or professional? • The standard Wordpress theme (Kubrick) • What can you do with Wordpress? • Can you make a newspaper with WP?
Do the nationals do it better? • The Sun, Daily Mail, Guardian, Telegraph, • BBC • Look at the layouts: simple, columnar, snippets of info. Cluttered? Do they hang together? Do the headlines tell the story? How much fits ‘above the fold’.
What can we do with a small site? • The Guardian • The Telegraph • East London Advertiser • SE1 • Everyblock – think about data journalism, and possibilities for hyperlocal
What does a website do that a paper cannot? • Immediacy, running stories. First thing I did this morning was sign in. • Feedback from readers – posting blog entries, photos, video, audio clips. • Rich content: maps, video, podcasts, galleries … all building context for story. • We can link to other authoritative sources. • Global reach.
What does a website do… • Flat front page … look at the snippets. Does this change the way I read a paper? • Any size – we aren’t limited by page count (also creates problems!). So infinite stories, infinite specialisms, whether trivial or affording greater depth.
What are the problems with that? • Straight to press. • Sketchy checking of facts. • When is a story finished? When do we pause for thought (Crimean War). • Readers get involved in debate … and there’s often more heat than light. • These are all the problems of ‘citizen journalism’. Everyone has a voice … but are all voices equally qualified?
Responsibilities • The web is full of rehashed, poorly checked, plagiarised, libellous, badly written copy … masquerading as journalism. As an online journalist you have the responsibility to be as good as print … or better. Print journalism emerged from the primordial slime, so can online.
How it used to be • The Times of London 1820
And some awful sites • Websites that suck • http://www.belladesoto.us • Daily Express
Find me a site that works… • Why? Look, feel, architecture, originality, niche market.
Doing it yourself…What experience do you have? • Writing • Photography • Blogging • Podcasting • Video • Graphic design • Coding
Planning • On paper not on the computer • Mindmap • Who’s it for? • What should it look like? • Text or graphics led? • National or local news? Niche interest • Pen and paper again … sketch your front
Plan a site • Any site … Pens, paper, computers, ideas
Register the domain • Walkthrough of GoDaddy
What do we build it in? • CSS/XHTML • Dreamweaver • CMS: Wordpress, Blogger, Joomla, Drupal, Webs
Wordpress.com demo • Go to wordpress.com • Register blog name to your email address • Activate email link • Start posting • Change appearance in settings • Set your own banner picture
Wordpress.org demo • Go to Wordpress.org • Download WordPress • Check out the Wordpress plugins to personalise your site • Go to the WordPress five-minute install • Video of the five-minute install
SEO • The magic of Google’s algorithm • Keywords in text • Keyword in title • Keyword in domain • 300-word posts
Getting your site live • Bluehost, around £5pcm • Godaddy, from £5 for a domain • Check your domain is available before your brand your site! • OR … use a freebie such as wordpress.com or blogger.com
Biggest mistakes • Thinking it’s all about you. They want something (news) and you have to deliver • Not being clear what your site is … if they can’t tell you probably don’t know • Horrible, ugly design … look at how other people do it first • Putting design before content • Rubbish navigation … pity the reader
And more • Thinking it’s all about the technology • Thinking normal journalistic standards don’t apply to the web … see the Telegraph
Notice elements you can use… • Google maps • Blogs … a conversation with readers • Twitter feeds • Facebook page • Handheld video reports • Breakout pages to photo albums
Get in groups • Plan a site – it can be news or specialist interest • Sketch out a front page of your site • Block in stories • Show what media you’re going to use to spin off the stories – and how • How can you build traffic?
Getting traffic! • The crawler • The index • The interface
Which search engines …and how they work • You need to think Ask, Bing and Yahoo as well as Google. How do algorithms work? It’s a blind guessing game. Signal to noise ratio, stop words. Semantic indexing and constructing relevancy patterns. ‘Racket, ‘Wimbledon’, ‘ball’ might belong together. But ‘racket’ could be about noise prevention, ‘Wimbledon’ a Tube map and ‘ball’ about dancing. Semantics all build to results being both relevant and hard to game.
Old-fashioned SEO • Keyword stuffing in the page, cloaked within the page and in the meta tags. • Multiple iterations of the same page, drowning the SERPs. • Hijacking of pages, redirects etc. Misleading keywords in metas. • Black hat SEO. • Not totally dead but dying. Luckily you’re not selling Viagra, porn or mortgages … you don’t have to cheat.
Words of caution • Don’t expect to get rich. • Don’t think it’s easy. • Don’t think it’s quick. • It’s easier to build a good product and then find traffic than vice versa. Unless you want to dedicate your life to SEO forget about it. • The upside is that good content is the Holy Grail for SEOs … you are writing original, informative content. This is gold dust.
What Google wants now • Relevant content. Meaning? That the stuff on the page is relevant to the page title and congruent with the site. The site’s called ‘Recipes with lamb’ and you have a page selling Viagra … that’ll trip a Google alert. Remember the robots are backed up by humans. • Content with a low keyword density and a semantic congruity … again, they’re trying to fight gaming. • No duplicate content – you can have a percentage, rather like Turnitin.
So what’s the ideal copy? • Good journalism! Original quotes, on subject, lots of contingent phrases – eg it’s about Afghanistan and we mention ‘Helmand’, IEDs, Operation Enduring Freedom, Taliban etc etc. But not stuffed … surrounded by stop words and other noise. • And lots of pages with related (or not obviously spammy content) and which link together.
We have the material … how do we work it • Basics. Keyword match in page title, H1s and body copy, ideally repeated in each par. But natural! • Disregard the meta tags, though you can insert mis-spellings in here. It can’t hurt, it may work. Even construct a page for mis-spellings.
LINK! • The lifeblood of Google and the model others have copied. • Link to other people. • Solicit reciprocal links (caution). • Forget link farming, link building schemes. • Provide great content people want to link too. Be a niche. The Zulu Principle. • Internal linking, linking within page. • Post to forums and link back to your page.
Make it easy for people and robots • Linking internally is great for your readers and for the spiders. • Provide a site map (humans and spiders again). • Keyword in links. • Avoid using gifs as links. If you do, try to add a text link too – not useless but limited.
Give them a blog • Encourage people into a dialogue on the site. It builds content, it builds returners. And Google LOVES blogs. They get ranked quickly but it obviously becomes a zero sum. • Give them maps, video, podcasts, surveys, youtube tutorials, stuff they can download. Google indexes loads of this stuff.
Writing to order • Reverse engineer. Use Wordtracker. But you are a journalist not a marketer … know the difference. • You’re hitting the long tail here. But you may just do that anyway.
Organic versus PPC? • Can you afford PPC? Is there an advantage? Why not build the site organically and monetise it later. • Submit your site to the indexes – don’t pay for it, eventually they’ll find you anyway.
Business or pleasure? • Commercial sites don’t rank like information sites. Beware of putting ads on your site as this is a flag. Two arguments here … some will argue that Google loves sites with Google ads.
Summary • Good content • Page title, H1 and keyword in text, as link • Link • Give stuff away • Make your pages sticky – increase traffic within pages, build a site map • Age is authority, is security within the SERPs