1 / 22

Maximizing Your Promotion: Associate to Full Professor Transition

Join the workshop on April 30, 2019, to understand expectations, qualifications, and evaluation criteria required for transitioning from Associate to Full Professor. Learn about the key areas of scholarly recognition, institutional service, and sustained contributions to your field. Explore the guidelines and necessary documentation, such as the Digital Dossier, needed for a successful promotion. Gain insights on preparing a comprehensive Faculty Portfolio to showcase your achievements.

wendyalvarez
Download Presentation

Maximizing Your Promotion: Associate to Full Professor Transition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WELCOME Associate Professor P&T Workshop Transitioning from Associate to Full Professor April 30, 2019

  2. Expectations

  3. PowerPoints will be available • on CALS webpage • About • Faculty/Staff • Promotion and Tenure

  4. Faculty Handbook Section 5.2.3.3 Qualifications for Academic Rank: Professor recognizedby his/her professional peers within the university, as well as nationally and/or internationally, for the quality of the contribution to his /her discipline.

  5. Faculty Handbook Section 5.2.3.3 Candidate must demonstrate: National distinction in scholarship, as evident in candidate's wide recognition and outstanding contributions to the field or profession Effectiveness in areas of position responsibilities Significant institutional service Contributions of appropriate magnitude and quality and likelihood of sustained contributions to field, profession, university

  6. Faculty Handbook Section 5.2.3.3 No set time-line The faculty member’s entire academic career must be considered in the evaluation. A recommendation for promotion to professor also must be based upon an assessment of the record, since the last promotion, regardless of the institution that granted the promotion.

  7. Time in Rank? The average length of time spent in rank as an Associate Professor in CALS: 6.5 years (range 3 – 26 years)

  8. Number of refereed publications? Number of refereed journal publications completed by candidates for Full Professor range: 10 – 35

  9. Portion of PRS devoted to research? range: 25% to 90% Faculty with higher levels of teaching and/or extension responsibility are promoted as frequently as those with higher levels of research responsibility

  10. Digital Dossier uploaded to CyBox Tab 1: Factual Summary, PRS and CV Tab 2: Portfolio Summary (25 pages) Tab 3: Department Evaluations Tab 4: College Evaluations Tab 5: External Evaluations Evaluation Product

  11. P&T Vita (Tab 1) Annotated Listing of activities, accomplishments (and your role in each) teaching and learning research and discovery extension and outreach service (professional and institutional)

  12. Portfolio – 25 pages (Tab 2) Evidence of quality, reputation and impact Faculty Handbook: Faculty Portfolio should… provide a clear understanding of the candidate’s accomplishments within scholarship and his or her areas of faculty activities include “an overall statement of the candidate’s accomplishments in scholarship as they relate to teaching, research/creative activities, and extension/professional practice.”

  13. Portfolio Tab 2 Template for CALS Available on the Provost’s P&T Site Copy available in your handouts

  14. The following slides can be used to show examples of good practices in presenting scholarship

  15. One, Thing and Thing Two. (2019). The long-term impact of the Cat in the Hat on Iowans. Journal of Dr. Seuss, Vol 14, 17-24. This is a standard citation as it would appear in your vita. For you promotion vita…

  16. One, Thing* and Thing Two. (2019). The long-term impact of the Cat in the Hat on Iowans. Journal of Dr. Seuss, Vol 14, 17-24. Role: Thing Two [the candidate] supervised Thing One’s PhD research, provided concept, analysis and interpretation of results, and editing of manuscript. [contribution: 25% concept; 30% analysis; 30% writing and editing] Significance: This is the first paper to address feline hat wearing. . . * MS, Ph.D. Post Doc or Research Associate supervised by T. Two.

  17. Teaching Responsibility Table: Courses Taught (List them all)

  18. Assessment of Teaching Effectiveness:Student Evaluation of Teaching Scale: 1 = Very Poor, 5 = Very Good NOTE: This scale is required by the Provost for all reporting on Student Evaluation of Teaching

  19. Portfolio: Illustrating Sponsored Funding Cumulative Funding 000$ Figure 4. Cumulative funding as principal investigator and co-investigator

  20. Portfolio: Summarizing Research Output & Impact TABLE 6. SUMMARY OF RESEARCH GRANTS BY AREA, GRANT AMOUNTS AND WORK PRODUCTS. Program No. of Amount Graduate Refereed Abstracts & Reports & Area Projects $ Mil. Students Journal Articles Proceeding Book Chpts Hats 6 $4.5 8 6 10 2 Feline Management 3 $1.8 5 5 8 1

  21. Portfolio: Summarizing Output & Impact Table 5. Summary of journal characteristics for candidate’s refereed publications (on Agronomy and plant biotechnology) from 20011 to present. Total: 18. Journal Acceptance Rate Articles Published Impact Factor* Cited Half-Life* Agronomy50% 7 1.5 >10 Premier journal in agronomy Plant Biotechnology 60% 3 3.6 9.5 Premier journal in plant science * Impact Factors & Cited Half-Life from ISI Web of Knowledge (Thomas Reuters) as of 4-15-2019

  22. NEXT: Advice from Chairs Kendall Lamkey Ruth MacDonald

More Related