1 / 18

CHIEFS OF STAFF ADVISORY COUNCIL FEAC UPDATE

CHIEFS OF STAFF ADVISORY COUNCIL FEAC UPDATE. COL Allan Stricker - MTARNG.

willa
Download Presentation

CHIEFS OF STAFF ADVISORY COUNCIL FEAC UPDATE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CHIEFS OF STAFF ADVISORY COUNCIL FEAC UPDATE COL Allan Stricker - MTARNG

  2. PURPOSE- The Facility Engineer Advisory Council (FEAC) advises the Chief, Installations Division of the National Guard Bureau (NGB) on pertinent installation management issues that effect the 50 states, 3 territories, and the District of Columbia in accomplishing the facilities mission. Charter OBJECTIVE- To focus assets and time to identify the most important problems and then concentrate our resources to solving those issues first.

  3. RESPONSIBILITIES- Each FEAC Area representative raises issues of state and national importance which cannot be solved at the local level. Issues are developed by Area FEAC members and raised to the National FEAC. Issues brought to the National FEAC will be discussed by the members to determine if they merit resolution as a national issue. If an issue can be solved by education or training, this is normally done through information papers from the NGB proponent. Charter

  4. Organization 1st US Army Area - West IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI 1st US Army Area - North CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, RI, VT 5th US Army Area - North AK, ID, IA, MT, ND, OR, SD, WA, WY 1st US Army Area - Central DE, DC, KY, MD, PA, TN, VA, WV 1st US Army Area - South AL, FL, GA, MS, NC, PR, SC, VI 5th US Army Area - West AZ, CA, CO, GU, HI, NV, UT 5th US Army Area - South AR, KS, LA, MO, NE, NM, OK, TX

  5. Chair COL Allan Stricker MTARNG 1USAAN COL Don Lajoie MEARNG 1USAAC COL Greg Phelps *** TNARNG 1USAAW LTC Jama Davidson * MNARNG 1USAAS LTC Chris Eaker ** SCARNG 5USAAN COL Allan Stricker MTARNG 5USAAS COL Bill Holmes ARARNG 5USAAW COL Lee Harrell COARNG Organization * FEAC member on TCAC ** FEAC member on EAB ***FEAC member on EAGLE

  6. Strategy, Planning, COL Bill Vonderschmidt KSARNG and Regulations Education and Training COL Dave Rogers IAARNG Automation COL Don Lajoie MEARNG SRM COL Lee Harrell COARNG Safety LTC Jama Davidson MNARNG Design and Criteria COL Bill Holmes ARARNG Energy and Security COL Greg Phelps TNARNG Manpower LTC Mike Windham MSARNG Program Initiatives BG (IA) Lennie Jave IAARNG Master Planning LTC Debi Roberts COARNG Subcommittees

  7. Current FEAC Issues • SRM • Funding/PBAC • Migration • MILCON • Funding • Execution • CFMO Manning/Training • Implementation • CFMO Education Program • ATFP - ARNG Facility Compliance • Systems Integration • Correct Data = Optimal funding for the ARNG • ASIP, TROUPERS, ISR, PRIDE, RPLANS • Sustainable Design • Building Commissioning

  8. Current COSAC Issues for FEAC • BASOPS Funding • Data Base Fidelity (ASIP, RPLANS, etc.) • Manning (#, flexibility, CFMO equity) • SRM to MILCON in the POM • Lead Swipe Testing (AGAUS)

  9. FY 03 funded at approximately 50% of requirement “Fence” on SRM funding MS Wylie proposing “national” migration from SRM Migration hurts ability to retain SRM funding Recommend - emphasis on programming adequate BASOPS (QDPW) funding BASOPS Funding

  10. Cooperation from all offices on ASIP Understanding that TROUPERS feeds ASIP ASIP transient training numbers drive MILCON requirements for transient training facilities RFMSS also plays into these requirements Recommend: All directorates emphasize complete and timely database submissions. Database Fidelity

  11. Insufficient technician manning State FTEs difficult to impossible - RPOM-PAS Ability to fill vacancies with qualified personnel Equity to incumbents - Access to “old” positions varies CFMO position grading (GS-14) Increased level of supervision (5 GS-12s) Complexity of financial transactions Credit for RPOM-PAS ILO Fed Techs (GS-13 level) Manpower Issues

  12. SRM is migrated in the POM SRM was migrated (and replaced) for FY 04 SRM is adequate for the first time ever Migration monitored by Congress SRM to MILCON

  13. No staff coordination No known health threat Potential disaster for the states Potential huge hit for SRM Minnesota “scared” into cleaning one armory $300,000 all state funds Multiply by number of armories Lead Swipe Testing

  14. 11-12 February 2003 San Antonio, TX 14-15 May 2003 Washington, DC 11-14 August 2003 Portland ME 20-23 October 2003 Washington, DC * FEAC Areas Meet on Call of Area Representative FEAC Meetings

  15. Other CFMO Meetings/Training 27 Jan-7 Feb 2003 CFMO University Biloxi, MS 27-30 May 2003 CFMO Conference ICW Society of American Military Engineers Seattle, WA

  16. Coordination = Success!! EAGLE EAB TCAC PORTAC IMAC FEAC COSAC HRAC AGAUS NGAUS

  17. Communications • CFMO’s contact their area Representatives. • FEAC information is included in the NGB-ARI web page and the NGB-ARI Bi-weekly Bulletin

  18. Questions?

More Related