530 likes | 647 Views
Toroids , Vortices, Knots, Topology and Quanta. Greg Volk the.volks@comcast.net Extraordinary Technology Conference July 31, 2011. Who is Greg Volk?. Attended Stanford 1979-1984 Electrical engineering / physics
E N D
Toroids, Vortices, Knots, Topology and Quanta Greg Volk the.volks@comcast.net Extraordinary Technology Conference July 31, 2011
Who is Greg Volk? Attended Stanford 1979-1984 Electrical engineering / physics OCR, CAD software, stock broker, music arranger, mortgage and real estate broker, landlord, investor Christian / young earth creationist
Goals of This Talk Why are toroids & vortices primary? Define energy, ether, mass, zero point Connect circuits to quanta & topology Introduce toroidal coordinates Discuss toroid knots & other knots Display the “strobe effect” model
Russ McGlenn • www.tccsa.tc/adventure/
Charles W. “Bill” Lucas, Jr. David L. Bergman Common Sense Science • www.commonsensescience.org
CSS Physical Models Spinning Charged Ring Hydrogen Molecule
CSS Accomplishments Predicts known properties of electron and proton Predicts properties of neutron, hydrogen and higher Uses known laws to establish stable, finite structures Provides physical meaning for constants e, c and h Explains wave/particle and mass/energy dualities Takes into account “coupling” or “mutual” energies Supports a vortex-based understanding of physics Electrodynamic derivation of gravity
Bergman Neutron Model David L. Bergman, “Notions of a Neutron”, Foundations of Science, Vol. 4, No. 2, 11 pages (2001) http://www.commonsensescience.org/pdf/articles/neutrons.pdf.
Profound Questions Can a whole be LESS than a sum of parts? WHERE is the mutual energy? Isn’t all energy ultimately “mutual”? …. What IS energy anyway? Does “coupling” relate to “entanglement”? Does it relate to entropy or temperature?
“Space is not nothing, or the mere location of bodies and forces, but a medium capable of supporting the strains of electric and magnetic forces. The energies of the world are not localized in the particles from which these forces arose, but rather are to be found in the space surrounding them.” -- Michael Faraday
“It is mainly with the hope of making Faraday's ideas the basis of a mathematical method that I have undertaken this treatise.” -- James Clerk Maxwell Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 1873
The Source of Attraction Like elements of charge (matter) repel Attraction from motion: Ampère / Bernoulli Fluid through a stream or pipe Velocity as channel area Narrow stream in sink / waterfall Parallel currents attract (Ampère)
Mach’s Principle Ernst Mach, George Berkeley, Aristotle "Local physical laws are determined by the large-scale structure of the universe." - Stephan Hawking, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time (1973). Matter there influences motion here. Motion is with respect to matter. - Not space itself, not observer
MachianGedanken-Experiment Imagine an element of matter. Is it moving? With respect to what? - If space, by what mechanism? - If observer, in what frame? If matter, then all other matter must actually BE present at that location. Can matter be present where it is not?
Yes! … and No It depends on the definition of ‘matter’. To exert its influence elsewhere, matter must possess ‘fields’. If an element’s field is inseparable from it (permanently attached), then it is actually present throughout all space. Then all forces are ‘local contact forces’.
Definitions Field: the influence a localized element of matter exerts at other points (D & H) Energy density: interaction of an element’s fields with the total field ( ): ether Energy: sum (integral) of all densities. Mass: energy as “resistance to motion”. -The greater an object’s “internal energy”, the less it is influenced from without.
Entropy & Zero Point Energy The ratio of a whole to the sum of its parts Mathematically In physics, A and B are fields, scaled by k. Temperature: a measure of mutual energy Mathematically Take away all interaction energy and get ZERO POINT ENERGY!
Energy is RELATIONSHIP 200 years ago, “heat” was a “thing” – caloric - But it measures relative translational motion Today “light” is still regarded as a “thing” - But it measures relative rotational motion Objects have “energy” by their “relationship” with other objects – in position and motion ENERGY IS NOT A THING!
Mass is Relational/Rotational Experiments - Eric Laithwaite, Bruce de Palma Theories - Dennis Allen, ParamahamsaTewari My derivation: Independently derived by Ajay Sharma
Mass is Magnetic Boyd Bushman (Bill Alek) magnet drop Is magnetism related to rotation? Absolutely! Fundamental particles have magnetic moments Why? Because they consist of charged circuits Magnetism results from the circulation or rotation of matter. Newton’s 3rd Law for continua => circuits
Why Circuits? Return to the element of matter It is part of a part of a part (divisibility) Can it move in isolation? No. -Each infinitesimal element follows another Can a string of elements move forever? No. - Sooner or later the moving path returns Circuits are fundamental!
The History of Vortex Theory The Greeks, Kepler, Descartes, Leibniz, Swedenbourg, Bošković, Ampère, Kelvin Planck’s “resonators” began quantum theory Parson, Compton, Bostick, Krafft, Tewari, Bergman, Lucas, Ginzburg, Kanarev, Sarg Physical, finite models Obeys the laws of electrodynamics
The Reason for Quanta Circuits are finite groups - Comprised of a collection of elements Rotation & expansion - group phenomena Even though the elements comprising circuits are continuous, circuits are finite Particles exist BECAUSE circuits are primary
The Concept of “State” Interactions are quantized, too! Balance between natural repulsion & attraction due to motion => Equilibria Instantaneous Energy State Energy Particles expand, contract, translate & rotate continuously about quantum states
Catastrophe Theory Mathematics deriving states from continua Magnetic memory Aka “hysteresis” Multiple solutions Bifurcation (Thom) Catastrophe machines
“Harry Popper” The Free Energy Catastrophe
More About “States” Twirly tube demonstration Blow hard as you like, bugles produce only multiples of a fundamental frequency Frequencies depend on a bugle’s geometry The same with fundamental particles! Except that states may be integer fractions of the fundamental
The Strobe Effect Always from the interaction of frequencies Wagon wheels on an old western Roulette wheels in Las Vegas Lissajous patterns, Rods Science Museum toy ALL vortices have a “return” (Davidson, p. 13) If all particles are circuits, having inertial frequencies, is the strobe effect fundamental?
Fundamental Energy Chart Individual (Electricity) Group (Magnetism)
Why Bipolar? Poles don’t occur singly, but in conjugate pairs True circuit nature of field or flow lines For every positive, a negative for every emission, an absorption for every action, a reaction for every explosion, an implosion for every out, an in; for every up, a down for every yang, a yin for every male, a female
Toroidal Coordinates Constant gives a fixed torus Toroid knots from a fixed ratio of to
Villarceau Circles n = 1, m = 1
Special Toroid Knots Trefoil Knot: n = 2, m = 3
Special Toroid Knots Figure 8 Knot: n = 3, m = 2
The Rodin Coil n = 5, m = 12
Multiple Rings 3 5 10 35
More Knots & Topology Tetra Cube OctaDod.
“God does not play dice.” -- Albert Einstein “Stop telling God what to do with his dice. Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood a single word. There is no quantum world. There is only an abstract physical description. "It is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how nature is. Physics only concerns what we can say about nature.” -- Neils Bohr
Can We Understand Quantum? Sorry, Neils. Sorry, Werner. Yes, we can. Elementary particles are no more than unique topological constructs. Thanks for listening!