1 / 12

Provincial Risk Management Dialogue: Fostering Collaboration for Enhanced Service Delivery

Join Totyelwa Nonco from National Treasury on 08 Nov 2018 for a dialogue addressing risk management in North West Province. Explore comparisons of indicators, budgets, staff, eLearning, and more to improve service quality. Gain insights into risk mitigation strategies and support initiatives to ensure effective risk management practices. Discover the importance of shifting towards integrated risk management and enhancing risk reporting structures for better decision-making. Participate in discussions to drive a culture of collective contribution towards a successful service delivery environment.

wmr
Download Presentation

Provincial Risk Management Dialogue: Fostering Collaboration for Enhanced Service Delivery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE PROVINCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT DIALOGUE “Doing more together to create a winning culture where everyone is contributing towards improved and speedy service delivery” NORTH WEST PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT Presenter: Totyelwa Nonco | National Treasury 08 November 2018

  2. CONTENT • North West against other Provinces • Indicators per Department • Indicators vs. Departmental Budget • Indicators vs. RM Budget • Indicators vs. RM Staff • Indicators vs. eLearning • Considerations

  3. NWPG AGAINST OTHER PROVINCES • Stats used for last AGSA audit completed, 2016/17 Financial Year • AGSA values • 1 = Qualified • 2 = Unqualified with findings • 3 = Unqualified with no findings • MPAT average rating used for the department

  4. INDICATORS PER DEPARTMENT • Stats used for last AGSA audit completed, 2016/17 Financial Year • AGSA values • 1 = Qualified • 2 = Unqualified with findings • 3 = Unqualified with no findings • MPAT average rating used for the department • Will overlay RM & Department Statistics

  5. INDICATORS vs. DEPARTMENT BUDGET • Comparison between departmental expenditure for the 2016/17 Financial Year • No clear relationship between departmental expenditure and AGSA/MPAT

  6. IINDICATORS vs. RM BUDGET • Comparison between departmental Risk Management expenditure for the 2016/17 Financial Year • Risk Management expenditure has some impact on indicators

  7. INDICATORS vs. RM STAFF • Comparison between departmental Risk Management staff compliment for the 2016/17 Financial Year • Some relationship between staff compliment and indicators • Departments with dedicated RM staff may have some advantage

  8. INDICATORS vs. RM ELearning • Comparison between departmental total staff who have completed the NT Risk Management ELearning programme • Relationship between education and indicators

  9. CONSIDERATIONS • Structure of the Risk Management Unit for the province– does the structure speak to the support needs of the province • Does the Risk Management Committee support the Provincial Risk Management initiatives and address the GAPS • DATA analysis used to enhance the risk registers of the Provincial Departments, Legislation and Entities • Shift from technical RM to integration • Risk prioritization • Risk reporting (system and structure to address particular risks) • A shift from traditional reporting – reporting on actual risk and its management • Beyond technical RM reporting - Technical RM reporting has been done and has had no impact

  10. SUPPORT _ NT

  11. “Naganela-pele: Think ahead”

More Related