1 / 25

An industrial view on Thorium: Possibilities, Challenges and Paths forward

An industrial view on Thorium: Possibilities, Challenges and Paths forward. Luc Van Den Durpel Vice President Strategic Analysis and Technology Prospective Corporate R&D ThEC 2013 Conference October 28 th – October 31 st 2013 CERN, Geneva.

wren
Download Presentation

An industrial view on Thorium: Possibilities, Challenges and Paths forward

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  2. An industrial view on Thorium: Possibilities, Challenges and Paths forward Luc Van Den Durpel Vice President Strategic Analysis and Technology Prospective Corporate R&D ThEC 2013 Conference October 28th – October 31st 2013 CERN, Geneva

  3. Possibilities for Thorium usein nuclearenergysystems ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  4. Whyis Thorium that … « modern » again? • « It isneutronicallyexciting » • As soon as youintroduce fertile materials, e.g. Th, youneed to balance the neutrons well • 233U canact as the « 239Pu » in thermal neutron spectrumreactors • And canprovide routes to synergies among thermal neutron spectrumreactors • Provideshigher conversion ratio routes in thermal neutron spectrumreactors • Though, some233Pa-233U management issues in-core • « It can, in the longer term, offersomeadvantages » • Less MA-production • Highermelting point & cooler fuel • One oxidation state • « It’s not plutonium » • Claims on proliferationriskadvantages • Provides an avenue to a « new nuclear » ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  5. There’s a (re)new(ed) « hype » on thorium today • « Generation-IV » • But mostproposalstoday on Th onlyaddress one family of strategies, i.e. « Th-dedicatednuclearenergysystems » • Manycanbeclassified as « Generation-X » (X ≥ 5) when full accountistaken of fuel cycle developmentsrequired • Pu and MA-management • During the last twodecades, Partitioning and Transmutation (P&T) was a strong driver of advanced fuel cycle R&D worldwide • E.g. Pu/Th-option for Pu-management • Nuclearenergysustainability • E.g. Indiatransitioningtowards233U/Th-cycle ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  6. Socio-politicalconsequencesfromthishype • « Wecanacceptnuclearenergy as solution, as long as itis Th-based » • Increasingdebate and ‘flawed’ discussions on the potential of thorium canibalising a truescientific-technologicalassessment of Th • The debateismostly or evensolelydriven by longer-term « Generation-IV/X » projections • Scientifically-technologicallycorrectnessisrequired • There willneverbe a « Th fuel cycle » without a (starting) complementaritywith a U/Pu-cycle • Any Th-use requires a fissile material to startwith • Any Th-fuel cycle requiresreprocessing and recycling to maketrue use of 233U and achieve the objectives • The claimedbenefits of « Th fuel cycle » willonlybegraduallyachieved and willtake a long time as well (>100 yrs) ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  7. Let’s demystify the role of Thorium a little • There are essentiallythreemajor families of scenarios envisaged for use of Th/233U • Complementary use of Th/233U in U/Pu nuclearenergysystems • Possibility to use Th/233U in LWRs, PHWRs and FRs in view of • Lengthening the cycle time in LWRs • Reducingthe Unat/TWhe use, and/or • Providing multiple-recycling option for Pu , and/or • Replacement of DU in specific cases, and/or • Breed233U for future use in otherreactorsystems • (Transition towards) « Generation-III(+) » 100% Th/233U-nuclear energysystems • Th provides synergies between thermal spectrumreactors, e.g. LWRs + CANDUs/AHWRs as well as withFRs • Th-dedicated « Generation-IV/X »-systems (X≥5) • « Generation-IV/X » longer-termoptions considering use of MSRs, ADSs, LFTRs, … ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  8. Th-use in nuclear power demands a (LT) strategywhy Th wouldbring value in a nuclear programme • Forget the claims that, internationally, « Th-fuel optimisedNPPs » wouldbeavailable ‘tomorrow’, e.g. < 2030 • There are today no classic argumentations driving in favour of th instead of Unat/Pu • For an investor in an NPP, the international marketoffersreliableindustrial solutions with international fuel cycle services in the U/Pu-cycle • No additionalrisksintroducing ‘game-changing’ technologies to ensurecompetitivenuclearenergy • Onlywith a medium- to longer-termstrategy, and addressingstrategic issues, Th maybecome a viable option for consideration • Th-fuel development and qualification in Gen-III(+) reactorstakes time and transitioningfrom an initial UOX/MOX-coretowards a (partial) Th-OX fueledcoretakes time as well • Unlessa government drives a large Th-fuel and reactor (R&D-)programme with a long-term vision, Th-use in nuclear power willoccur • Progressively in Gen-III(+) reactors, potentiallypreparingGen-IV and/or Gen-X options • Providing the answer to specific challenges which are primarily of fuel cycle nature • Ensuringthat the Th-containing fuel iswellcomplementarywith the U/Pu-cycle and offeringadditionalflexibilityto NPP-operators and countries ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  9. Indicative timeline for U/Pu/Th-use in nuclearenergysystems ADS / MSR/LTFR HTR 233U / Th AHWR UTh-OX 233U Th F(B)R Th-Blanket FR-MOX Pu U-Blanket ALWR Pu Pu MOX Pu Pu LWR UOX MOX URT URT URT U PHWR Today 2020 2030 2040 2050 ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  10. As nuclearwillgrow … theremightbesomeconcerns • Temporaryimbalances of supply/demand for front-end services, specificallyUnatavailability, may lead to higher and more volatile fuel pricesduring the 2030-2050 period • Perception of temporary ‘scarcity’ due to possible imbalanceUnatsupply/demandespecially in light of rapidlygrowingregional NPP-parkswithadditionaleffectfrom U-traders in a single-productmarket • NPP’s trend towardstechnicallifetimes(well) beyond60 years • Investorsneed to beassuredthat fuel availabilityis not an issue for theirinvestment over long time horizons • Today’sLWR-designs willbe operating wellinto the 22ndcentury!! • As such, fuel cycle flexibilityisbecomingincreasingly important • Planningactions towardshigher fuel cycle flexibilityinclude • In the short and medium-termfuel deliverycontracts (time-period, multiple providers, …) • In the medium- to longer-termtechnical fuel and fuel cycle flexibility, i.e. havingqualified fuels with fissile/fertile content U-Pu, 30%-100% MOX, U-Th, Pu-Th, 233U-Th according to market and technologicaldevelopments • In addition, new NPPs, i.e. specificallyallowing « multi-recycling Pu » in LWRsand ultimatelyFRsprovidebetter use of naturalresourceswhilealsopotentiallyreducingamount of ultimate radioactive waste ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  11. Challenges ahead ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  12. What are the drivers to use Thorium in nuclear power especially, and ideally, atlargerscale in due time? • What are the new ‘market’-conditions for Th-use compared to the past? • Nuclear power is a hugely capital-intensive industrywiththus, inherently, technologylock-in behaviour • And do not forget fuel cyccletechnlogiesdevelopment and strategies ! • Th/233U involves multiple issues in a ‘100%’ Th/233U fuel cycle, i.e.: • Fissile material balance for start-up • Recycling and especiallyrefabrication issues with232U • Proliferationriskassessmentis not univocally in favouronly • If therewouldn’tbe new market conditions, one couldeasilyremainwith Th on ‘paper-level’ if not driven by a governmentalstrategy as the switchingcostsfrom U/Pu to Th/233U for nuclearindustry are very important or evenhuge • Are thereany new drivers todaythatwouldfacilitate progressive introduction of Th? • And if so, ideallyaddressing a large part of the nuclear power parkworldwide, i.e. addressing LWR fuel cycle? ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  13. ‘Conditions’ to consider Th in LWR-basedenergysystems? • Are thereanyimprovement avenues in U/Pu-cycle where Th providesadded value? • Lengthening the cycle time in LWRs • Reducing the Unat/TWhe use, and/or • Providingadditional multiple-recyclingoption for Pu, and/or • Replacement of burnable poisson in specificcases • But • Fuel cycle impacts especially in recyclingschemes • Anyconsideration of Th-use needs to be progressive • Keep as long as possible the « thorified » fuel separatefrom the U/Pu-cycle • This means • As long as possible, keepboth fuel cycles separated • How? • Couple U/Pu and Th/233U neutronicallythough not physicallynorchemically for as long as possible untiltheremightbe a market to go towards « Th fuel cycle » ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  14. An alternative schemeamongmanyconsiderable 233U / Th AHWR UTh-OX Th 233U F(B)R Th-Blanket ALWR FR-MOX Pu Pu U-Blanket Pu PuThOX MOX UOX MOX Pu Pu Pu LWR UOX MOX URT URT URT U ? ? PHWR Today 2020 2030 2040 2050 ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  15. There are multiple pathsbeforeembarkinginto « Th-cycle »: someprovidecomplementaritywith U/Pu-cycle already in medium-term Fraction of Th in U/Th or Pu/Th fuel (%) MSR « Th/233U-cycle » with Th-optimisedreactor concepts 100 LFTR AHWR (India) Pu/Th options LWRs/CANDUs U/Th options towardsUnat/TWhereduction Objectives: • Unat/TWhereductionthrough in-core233U breeding and recycling • Level of Th-content important for potential in reducingUnat/Twhethoughdemanding MEU for high Th-contents 50 Objectives: ≈ 5 – 10% Pu/th • Unat/TWhereductionthrough in-core233U breeding and recycling • Multi-recycling of Pu (fromused MOX) in LWRs • ≈ 14 – 20 % Pu/th • Pu-burningwhilebreeding233U in transition scenarios • High BU options withSiCcladding for once-burn-disposal Objectives: • BU and cycle length extension • Reduction/Replacement of Gd as burnable poison • Core power flattening 10 Th as additive LWRs / CANDUs 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  16. Sometake-awaysfromAREVA’sassessment of Th-options in LWRs • Based on EPRTM-design evolutionary fuel options • ‘Envelope’ of evolutionary Th-use potential • One canintroducebeneficially Th in LWRswhilekeeping U/Pu and Th/233U-vector as long as possible separated • Some 20 to 50% of energyprovided by 233U • Most options requirereprocessing to ensureachievement of objectives • Though, given stable 233U, reprocessingmaybedelayed • Reduction by 25 – 35 % of Unat/TWhe in recyclingschemes • An improved Pu-balance in UOX and MOX for multi-recycling of Pu • Reduction in enrichmentneeds • Reduced MA-production ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  17. AREVA and Thorium: expertise and experiencedatingfrom the 1970s • Thorium is not new for AREVA • AREVA holdsinventory of 2450 tTh as Th-nitrate in France from former miningoperations (Madagascar) and AREVA developed the appropriatetechnological solutions for itsproper management (processing, handling, interimstorage) • AREVA researched and (co-)fabricated Th-fuels for PHWRs, HTRs, and LWRs • 1970s BWR Lingen irradiation of 2.5%-Pu/Th pellets (20 GWd/tHM) • 1980s collaborative program on Th-fuel for PWRs • 1990-2000s PWR Obrigheim UPu/Th irradiation (up to 37 GWd/tHM) • PIE indicated no issues • Sol-gel, powdermetallurgy and impregnation fabrication methodsweretested and no major issues up to 30% Pu wereencounteredthoughdemandingmodifiedprocessparameters • Ceramiclab(s) stillavailable and equipped for Th-fuel R&D-programme(s) ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  18. Pathsforward ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  19. Thorium can have its place in a growingnuclearenergy future • As nuclearenergyis a prime contributor to addressclimate change and energysustainability objectives worldwide • A progressive and U/Pu-complementary introduction of Thorium isconditional to any Th-use in the future • Any introduction of Th needs to beassessedindustrially to ensuretechnical-economic effective and efficient pathsforward for such Th-use • Given the overallworldwidedevelopmentsrelated to thorium, both in the nuclearenergyfield as in the rare-earthmarket AREVA and SOLVAY jointheir know-how to add value tothorium’sentire life cycle ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  20. AREVA and SOLVAY’sprovideholistic Th-management RE-mining REO processingintoproducts RE-ore processing REO separation and purification Th-residues Th-residues LT Interim Storage Th Interim Storage Th-residues Separation and Purification of Th Valorisation as Th-fuel in nuclear power Other applications of Th ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  21. AREVA-SOLVAY « Thorium Valorisation » Agreement • AREVA and Solvay embarkedsince 2013 in a collaborative programme towards Thorium valorisation • Bothcompaniestogether master the complete set of Thorium valorisation routes in the short- to longer-termwithclear synergies ensuring Thorium valorisation services also to beprovided to third parties. • The collaborative programme encompasses • Resolving the Th-residues issues arisingfrom certain Rare Earthprocessing in the past and now • Providing an industriallyrobust valorisation argumentation focused on Thorium valorisation in nuclear power in the medium-term • Ensuring best-practice interim management options for Thorium awaitingthis Thorium valorisation in the medium-term • An R&D-programme focused on medium-term Thorium valorisation in nuclear power isset-upwith international R&D-partnersgearedtowards first phase of fuel-developmentwith irradiation by 2020 ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  22. Synthesis of AREVA-SOLVAY’s R&D-programme on Th-valorisation in nuclearenergy Phase 4 Phase 1a Phase 3 Phase 0 Phase 2 Phase 1b Selection of NPP-irradiation and licensing of irradiation Downselection of Th fuel cycle strategies and fuel fabdevelopment focus Decision on Th-fuel development • Detailing fuel cycle strategieswith international partners • R&D international consortium • Preparinglabs Licensed Irradiation in NPP start Decision on Lead Test FA irradiation Fuel Fabdevelopment and testing Experimental R&D Programme NPP Segmented Rod irradiation to high BU and PIE « There isclear scope for Th-use in future nuclear power and R&D-programme to bestrengthened » Lead Test FA Irradiation ScopingAnalysis of Th-options Qualified Th-fuel development • ReactorPhysicsstudies (LWR, PHWR, FR) • PhDs • Techno and Patent Watch • International Projectsinvolvement • Know-How transfer - 2012 2013 2014 2016 2018 2020 2025 2030 ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  23. In Summary ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  24. Concluding observations • Please, demistify the « Th fuel cycle » story and claims • Th-dedicated « Generation-IV/X » systemswon’tmakeit: • Without an initial long period of complementaritywith U/Pu-cycle in Gen-III(+) and IV systems • Without a government long-term vision spurringtheirdevelopment • Is there a clearmarket for U/Th and Pu/Th-fuels in the short-term? • In the medium-term: possiblydepending on the international nuclearenergysystemsdevelopmentand the requirement for fissile/fertile materials management synergistically intra-nuclear and inter-regionally • Transition, if desired to go towards « 100% Th », willtake a time, i.e. decadesat least • AREVA and SOLVAY are • investigating Th-fuel options as complement to U/Pu-cycle in an international context and • addressing a holistic Thorium management providingindustrial solutions to thoserequiring and considering valorisation of thorium both in Rare Earth as in nuclearenergymarket • AREVA and Solvay welcome collaboration with R&D-organisations and othercompanies ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

  25. Thankyou ThEC2013 - Industrial View on Thorium - 28-31 October 2013

More Related