170 likes | 281 Views
Criminal Background Checks for Applicants Accepted to Health Professions Schools. Robert F. Sabalis, PhD Associate Vice President Student Affairs and Programs March 16, 2006. AAMC Executive Council Action.
E N D
Criminal Background Checks forApplicants AcceptedtoHealth Professions Schools Robert F. Sabalis, PhD Associate Vice President Student Affairs and Programs March 16, 2006
AAMC Executive Council Action • In June 2005, the AAMC Governance approved the Group on Student Affairs (GSA) proposal that “criminal background checks be completed on all applicants accepted annually to medical school” • Four major purposes for checks: • Maintain the public trust in medicine • Ensure the safety and well-being of patients • Assist applicants/students to enter clinical clerkships and be licensed as physicians • Limit schools’ and hospitals’ liability
Medical School Involvement • A need for active medical school involvement in defining criminal background check (CBC) requirements: • Affiliated clinical institutions’ policies are mandating CBCs • States statutes are mandating CBCs • Applicants need accurate information • Admission decisions are a faculty responsibility
Other Health Professions? • CBCs discussed at a 2/1/06 FASHP meeting • General interest and concern expressed • Different approaches to the CBC challenge: • Some associations have promoted a decentralized approach to CBCs • Other associations only now beginning this discussion • Cost of CBC identified as a factor • Some professions leaving the CBC decision to licensing boards rather than schools
AAMC Background • Expectations of the public? • Two-fifths of state medical boards require (or can require) CBCs of licensure applicants • But school employees, volunteers, and others must have them • In the face of societal stressors and recent medical school events, the public is seeking reassurance where it can • Federation of State Medical Boards recommended that member boards seek legislation to permit CBCs for licensure applicants
GSA Recommendations • One year in development, 2004-2005 • 1/4 of schools currently performing CBCs • Others schools are considering them, but waiting for guidance • Schools want national process through AAMC: • Cost-effective for applicants, with • Consistent and comprehensive results • Schools want to retain authority for decision-making, but desire guidelines for interpretation of CBC data
GSA Recommendations • CBC be completed upon first school acceptance • Same CBC report be available to all schools that later accept the same applicant • CBCs be part of post-acceptance matriculation process, not of application/interview process • Matriculation decision follow school’s review of CBC report • Applicant authorize CBC and receive report • Each school’s faculty develop relevant CBC policies in collaboration with clinical affiliates
GSA Recommendations • Factors to be considered when CBC reveals information of concern include: • Nature, circumstances, frequency of offense(s) • Length of time since offense • Documentation of successful rehabilitation • Accuracy of information provided by applicant • One comprehensive CBC be done, with each school getting all data that it desires and permitted by law • Each school should develop guidelines for CBC data handling
GSA Recommendations • CBCs should: • Be based on past areas of residence • Include in-person search at local county level • And search at state and national levels • Not be completed solely via computer databases • Include sex offender search • Include search for dishonorable discharge from Armed Forces
GSA Recommendations • CBC should involve: • All levels of offense • All types of adjudications • All unresolved legal processes • All types of offenses • Arrest data only when case has not been fully adjudicated; otherwise only conviction data
GSA Recommendations • CBCs should not be limited to specific time period, given age range of applicants • GSA should develop guidelines for consideration by schools about use of CBC data • Schools should consider the uneven administration of justice in the US for minority and disadvantaged persons in decision-making • School policies on CBCs should be developed separately from policies about medical and psychiatric conditions and disabilities
Unanswered Questions • Where should CBC data be housed? • Which school officials should have access? • Should data be shared between school offices? • Should “terrorist” search be included? • What about juvenile/expunged records? • Should CBCs include fingerprinting, search for professional license revocation, and/or drug screening?
Current Status • 18-member AAMC CBC Advisory Committee met 2/13-14/06 in DC • Composed of AAMC constituent and external, medically related groups • Adopted nine goals for CBCs: • Simplicity Transparency • Equity Affordability • Accuracy Risk mitigation • Community involvement • “Ownership” by medicine • Effectiveness/success
Current Status • CBC Advisory Committee recommended: • An AAMC-sponsored centralized, national CBC service • Implementation of the GSA recommendations + • Revision of AMCAS application to collect additional self-report criminal history information to be checked against CBC report • CBC reports should exclude: • Juvenile offense data • Arrest (without conviction) data
Current Status • CBC Advisory Committee’s recommendations will be presented to AAMC Governance in June 2006 • Earliest implementation date: fall 2007 for fall 2008 entering class • Information being sought about schools’, states’, and clinical affiliates’ requirements • GSA starting to develop “best practice” guidelines for use by schools
Lessons Learned • An emotionally charged topic requiring more time for discussion and “working through” than expected • Potential exists for a wide variety of requirements from schools, states, and affiliated facilities • Schools must get out ahead of this discussion before others mandate widely divergent requirements and systems • The complex decision for or against checks is only part of the equation; implementation is also very complex