ED Studies P & T

1. ED Studies P & T Review & Modifications of Procedures

2. ED Studies P & T Procedures PTPI Target Score of 100 Service Scholarship Teacher Effectiveness

3. Overview • Teacher Effectiveness (approximately 70%) • Peer Evaluation • Face-to-Face Instruction • Online Course Instruction • Teaching Materials • Student Evaluation • Self-Evaluation • Interview by P&T Committee • Additional Evidence

4. Overview • Scholarship (approximately 20%) • Priority I • Priority II • Priority III • Priority IV • Service (approximately 10%) • Standard of performance increasesmoving from Associate Professor to Tenure to Full Professor. • Target Score for all three is 100.

5. Scholarship & Service • Scholarship and Service credit can be estimated by using the PTPI Spreadsheet. • PTPI Spreadsheet • See documents W and X on the CD that you received last Fall.

6. Teacher Effectiveness • Each of the six subscores is scored with a rubric describing how the evidence supplied by the candidate will be evaluated. • Teaching Materials Rubric • Suggestions for scoring the rubric are provided for each rubric. • For Teaching Materials it is Document I on the CD.

7. Most Important Change • How can you help the P&T Committee better understand the evidence supplied in the portfolio? • Submission of Materials as per the Faculty Handbook will continue. • BUT expanded documentation with respect to the ED Studies P&T procedures must be undertaken to guarantee the validity of your evidence.

8. Example • Teaching Materials Rubric has five sub-categories: TM-1, TM-2, TM-3, TM-4, TM-5. • The P&T Committee must assign a score for each of these. • If they can’t find the evidence in your portfolio that addresses that sub-category, the rubric score will be low.

9. Recommendations • Make sure you provide evidence for every sub-category. • Follow the suggestions that the P&T Committee will be using to evaluate each sub-category. Document I . • Label each piece of evidence. Use a color-coding system. (Example: Dr. Hewitt’s promotion materials)

10. Recommendations • The same strategy could be used in artifacts submitted in the scholarship category. • A reprint of an article published in a national journal (I-S4) should be labeled so the P&T Committee knows at what level of scholarship you think the artifact represents. • A different color code could be used for II-S4 or III-S2, etc.

11. Another Important Change • The Peer Review Rubric requires visits by your peers to “observe” your instruction. • Face-to-face (Document B) • Online Instruction (Document C) • Arrangements must be made for the “peer observations” (especially if they involve observations made by “peers” from off-campus) to be made during the Fall semester (ASAP).

12. Minor Modifications • There are some other minor modifications that may need to take place between now and the next round of promotion and tenure deliberations early next semester. • The ED Studies P&T procedures are ever evolving, and your suggestions are always welcome.