1 / 32

The Rise of Sublocal Governance

The Rise of Sublocal Governance. Robert H. Nelson. Local Governance -- America’s Most Important, Least Studied Issue. Regulates Residential and Commercial Land Markets Provides Schools General Purpose Local Governments – 39,044 School Districts – 14,561 Other Special Districts – 39,381.

xuan
Download Presentation

The Rise of Sublocal Governance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Rise of Sublocal Governance Robert H. Nelson

  2. Local Governance -- America’s Most Important, Least Studied Issue • Regulates Residential and Commercial Land Markets • Provides Schools • General Purpose Local Governments – 39,044 • School Districts – 14,561 • Other Special Districts – 39,381

  3. General Purpose Local Governments • 3,033 Counties (US) • 19,492 Municipalities (US) • 16,519 Townships (US) • New Jersey – 566 Municipalities, 324 Townships • Maryland – 157 Municipalities, No Townships • Virginia – 229 Municipalities, No Townships • Pennsylvania – 1,016 Municipalities, 1,546 Townships

  4. U.S. Asset Ownership • Residential Property Ownership (US) -- $22 Trillion (2006), $15 Trillion (2009) • Commercial Property Ownership -- $5.3 Trillion (2007) • New York Stock Exchange -- $13 Trillion (2000), $7.2 Trillion (2002) • NASDAQ $5.5 Trillion (2000), $1.8 Trillion (2002)

  5. Land Use and Local Government – A Neglected Area of Scholarship • Urban economics – brief flurry 1970s, loss of interest in economics profession since then • RFF – Major focus in 1950s-1970s, Marion Clawson leading US land economist, almost no remaining presence at RFF • The Urban Institute – now study poverty, health, fiscal policy – little on land use, local government • Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations – Abolished 1995 • Left to urban planning departments – weak intellectual tradition

  6. Difficulties of Land Use, Local Governance Research • In Same State, Hundreds of Often Overlapping Political Units • Wide Variation from State to State • Poor Data Availability • Progressive Antagonism -- Local Governments Seen as All Political, Poorly informed, “Feudal” Throwbacks • National Government is Modern, Center for “Scientific Management” of the Nation

  7. An Outlier -- The Bloomington School • Much of early work on local government • Required unusual combination of interests, skills in academy • Emphasis on field investigation, case studies • Multi-disciplinary approach • Unusual awareness of core value and policy assumptions and blind spots of social science disciplines (often unconscious)

  8. Law Journals – Best Scholarly Source of Information on Local Government • Law journals more useful than social science journals • Legal profession is more practical, closer to the real world, less controlled by limiting disciplinary tunnel visions • Lawyers are generalists (ie., multidisciplinary) • More legal case studies • Richard Briffault, Columbia Law School – “The Rise of Sublocal Structures in Urban Governance” (1998)

  9. Briffault - The Need for Sublocal Governments • Large Local Governments Apply Uniform Rules, Service Levels over Large Areas • Smaller Areas Within the Larger Jurisdiction Often Have Quite Different Service Demands, Ability to Pay • The Needs of the Smaller Areas Are Neglected by the Uniform Policies of the Wider Jurisdiction • Sublocal Governance Allows Greater Territorial Variation, Specialization within Wider Jurisdiction

  10. Growth of Sublocal Structures • Special Zoning Districts • Business Improvement Districts • Historic Districts • Tax Increment Finance Districts • Enterprise/Empowerment Zones • Private Streets (St. Louis) • Charter Schools (Sublocal governance, if not geographically based)

  11. Private Community Associations • 1970 – 10,000 Community Associations, • 2008 – 300,000 Community Associations • 1970 – 2.1 million residents of Community Associations, • 2008 – 59.5 million residents (20 percent of U.S. population) • Half of new housing units from 1980 to 2000 built in a community association

  12. Types of Community Associations • Homeowners Associations (55 %) • Condominiums (40%) • Cooperatives (5%) • First condominium built in US in 1962, the Greystoke development in Salt Lake City • Most community associations have exterior common elements and involve multiple buildings

  13. Advantages of Community Associations • Form of Sublocal Governance, Allows Greater Territorial Specialization • Tighter Local Controls – Sought By Many, if Sometimes a Source of Controversy • Collective Service Levels Meet Specific Demands of Sublocal Jurisdiction • Easier to Form Community Association, Compared with Sublocal Public Entity • Private Status Promotes Governmental Efficiency

  14. Local Governments Confound “Market” v. “State” Distinction • Community Association is Form of Government • Strong Private Coercive Controls, Imposed by Majority (or Supermajority) -- e.g., allowable house paint colors, shrub placement • Private “Taxes” • Private Security Guards, Private Fines and Other Private Enforcement, “Judicial” Appeals Process

  15. Also Large Public Role – Nevada Controls the Following (1997, 1999, and 2003 Laws) • Capped fines HOAs could levy at $50 (now up to $100). • Required HOA boards to receive approval from their residents before starting litigation. • Required board elections every two years and prohibited proxy votes during board elections. • Banned foreclosure based on nonpayment of fines. • Required education for property managers. • Mandated annual meetings with announced agendas. • Created a mechanism for recalling HOA board members. • Created first an ombudsman's office and later a state commission to hear complaints and enforce regulations. • Required that new home buyers be informed of CC&Rs and sign off on surrender of rights before closing.

  16. The “Privateness” of Local “Public” Governments • Choosing to Move into a Municipality of Say 3,000 People is a Voluntary Act – No Less Voluntary Than Moving Into a New Community Association • A Well Financed “Public” School in a Rich Small Suburb Is the Educational Equivalent of a High Quality Private School • R. Nelson (1977), W. Fischel (1985) – Suburban Zoning is Effectively a “Collective Property Right” • Suburban Municipal System Produces Marketlike Social Distribution of Local Public Goods

  17. Tiebout Model (1956) – The De Facto Privatization of Local Government • Small Suburban Municipalities are Like Private Clubs (Provide Collective Services, Collect Revenues) • Intense Competition Among Suburban Municipalities • If Zero Transactions Costs, Perfect Information, and No Economies of Scale, Municipal Competition Will Achieve Perfect Market Efficiency in Allocation of Collective Goods • Tiebout (1956) – “The allocation of Resources Will Be the Same as it Would Be If Normal Market Forces Operated” in a System of Private “Municipal” Clubs.

  18. Local “Public” versus “Private” = Alternative Local Constitutional Regimes • – Local “Public Government,” versus Local “Private Government” -- Two Alternative Constitutional Sets of Rules • Each Has Elements of Publicness and Privateness • Legal Fiction – Clear Distinction Between “Public” and “Private” Local Government • Fiction Serves Useful Purpose – Allows Judges to Permit Overlapping Sets of Alternative Local Constitutional Rules

  19. An Example of Local Rules Regime Differences – Initial Creation • Local Municipality – Must Be Created as Act of Municipal Incorporation (According to Widely Varying State Rules of Incorporation) • Municipal Incorporation Occurs After the Fact of Residential Occupancy • Community Association -- Created by Developer as Part of Development (New Government Technically Created Through Filing Covenants) • Community Association Established Before First Residential Occupancy

  20. Other Constitutional Differences • Municipalities Change Regulatory Rules By Simple Majorities, Community Associations Usually by Supermajorities • One Person One Vote in Municipalities, Voting by Property Ownership in Community Associations (A Few Do Allow Renters to Vote) • Elected Mayors and Councils in Municipalities, Private Corporate Organization (Elected Boards of Directors) in Community Associations

  21. “Public” versus “Private” = Competition Among Alternative Local Constitutional Rules • Small Local Municipality and Similar Size Community Association are Alternative Forms of Local Governance • Or, Might Equally Well Say Alternative Forms of Land Tenure • Before Fact of Development, Governance/Tenure Choice Is Often Available • After Development, Competition is Practically Infeasible • But Many Local Governments Now Require Community Associations as Condition for Development Approval – Large Fiscal Gains

  22. The Transformation of Local Government • Traditional Northeast and Midwest – Large Center City, Hundreds of Surrounding Small Municipalities • New Pattern in South and West – One or a Few Large County or Municipal Governments, Hundreds of Private Community Associations • Chicago metropolitan area – 569 General Purpose Local Governments • Las Vegas metropolitan area – 13 General Purpose Local Governments

  23. Older Metropolitan Areas, Local Governance Patterns • Older Metropolitan AreasNumber of Local Governments Buffalo (1.2 million population)            65Chicago (9.2 million)                       569Cincinnati (2.0 million)                    233Cleveland (2.9 million)                     243Detroit (5.5 million)                       335Milwaukee (1.7 million)                     113Minneapolis (3.0 million)                   318Philadelphia (5.1 million)                  442Pittsburgh (2.4 million)                    418St. Louis (2.6 million)                     314

  24. Newer Metropolitan Areas, Local Governance Patterns • Newer Metropolitan AreasNumber of Local GovernmentsAustin (1.2 million population) 49 Las Vegas (1.6 million)                     13Orlando (1.6 million)                        40Miami (3.9 million)                          62Raleigh-Durham (1.2 million)                 30Phoenix (3.3 million)                        34San Diego (2.8 million)                      19Tampa (2.4 million)                          39

  25. SubLocal Governance • Adds to Range of Local Constitutional Rules Regimes • Might Be Seen As District “Amendments” to Wider Local “Public” Rules Regime • Sublocal “Public” Governance Often Resembles Community Association Set of Rules • Sublocal Governance Allows a Private “Retrofit” in an Existing Public Setting

  26. Historic Districts • Rapid Spread Since 1970s • U.S. National Park Service Estimates 2,300 historic districts in the United States (2007) • Regulate the Smallest Details of Exterior Property Changes – Like a Community Association • Wide Use of Historic “Fiction” to Gain New Sublocal Regulatory Regime • Historic District Creation Does Not Require Unanimous Consent (as Would a New Community Association in an Existing Neighborhood)

  27. Business Improvement Districts • Rapid Spread Since 1970s • More than 1,500 BIDs in North America • Fund Environmental Enhancements (Cleanups, Signs, etc.), Address Disruptive Social Problems (Homelessness in District) • Governed by Board of Directors • Can Assess District Tax • Created Through Business Owner Approval (Majority or Supermajority) • Like a Community Association for Business

  28. Charter Schools • New Form of Education Sublocal Governance • Charter School Has Own Governance Rules, Partially Replaces City or District Rules • But Not Organized Around Common Geographic Boundaries • 4,500 charter schools in the United States with 1.5 million students (2008) • Community Associations May In Future Include New Charter School as Part of Development Process

  29. “Charter Neighborhoods”? • A Possible New Form of Sublocal Governance • Draw from Business Improvement District Experience • Transfer Neighborhood Governance Functions to New Neighborhood Associations • Include Limited Neighborhood Regulatory and Taxing Authority • Mercatus Policy Comment No. 20 (May 2008) – “From BIDs to RIDs: Creating Residential Improvement Districts”

  30. A Sublocal Future • At Present, a Limited Set of Sublocal Constitutional Regimes Available • Might Design Whole new Sublocal Constitutional Regimes that Are Not Now Legally Available • Create More Competition Among Rules Regimes • Geographic Districts Choose their Preferred Constitutional Scheme

  31. The Secession Option • Sublocal Alternative Assumes that District Remains within Same Wider Local Jurisdiction • Some Rules Sublocal, Other Rules Jurisdictionwide • A More Radical Alternative – Secession • Could Have Regime of Free District Secession – Within Framework of Wider Rules Controlling Process of Secession

  32. Metropolitan Governance as a Free Competitive Process • Have Alternative Constitutional Rules for Local Governance • Allow Local Governments to Choose Their Own Rules • Allow Sublocal Variations from Such Rules • Allow Secession Altogether to Establish a New Local Jurisdiction with Its Own Free Choice of Constitutional Regime • In Sum, Local Government as Free Competition

More Related