1 / 54

Outcome of NPRP 5 th Cycle

Outcome of NPRP 5 th Cycle . Agenda NPRP 5th Cycle. 1. Major Changes. 2. Statistics & Funding Process. 3. Cycle Outcome . 4. 4. 4. QNRF Impact on Research Culture. 5. NPRP 5th Cycle Major Changes.

yamal
Download Presentation

Outcome of NPRP 5 th Cycle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Outcome of NPRP 5th Cycle

  2. Agenda NPRP 5th Cycle 1 Major Changes 2 Statistics & Funding Process 3 Cycle Outcome 4 4 4 QNRF Impact on Research Culture 5

  3. NPRP 5th Cycle Major Changes Strict screening criteria: 38 proposals (5.7%) were screened out from 670 vetted proposals Constraint on LPI eligibility: 5 peer reviewed publications 1 2

  4. NPRP 5th Cycle Statistics & Funding Process Screened Proposals 269 129 118 76 27 13 Social Sciences Humanities Medical & Health Sciences Natural Sciences Engineering & Technology Agricultural Sciences

  5. Screened Proposals NPRP 1 NPRP 2 NPRP 3 NPRP 4 NPRP 5 118 269 255 214 225 138 137 129 118 100 110 91 99 77 86 76 56 55 56 37 27 13 23 10 19 9 8 8 7 4 Medical & Health Sciences Natural Sciences Engineering & Technology Agricultural Sciences Social Sciences Humanities

  6. Peer Reviewing Process 5 PRs 4 PRs 3160 assigned peer reviewers Each proposal was sent to 5 Peer Reviewers 1 3 2 By deadline, 3059 reviews were submitted 3 PRs 85.8% Average Review: 4.8 per proposal 12.5% 1.7%

  7. Scientific Merit (Max. 60 points) Evaluation Criteria Peer Reviewer Research Team Qualification (Max 20 points) Budget Merit (Max 20 points)

  8. Evaluation Criteria Scientific Merit (Max. 60 points) Criterion 2 Criterion 3 Knowledge Advancement Organization Criterion 4 Criterion 1 10 points 20 points Benefit to Qatar Novelty Scientific Merit 10 points 20 points

  9. Evaluation Criteria Research Team Qualification (Max. 20 points) Team outside Qatar If all research team inside Qatar Team inside Qatar 10 points 20 points 10 points Research Team Qualification

  10. Evaluation Criteria Budget Merit (Max. 20 points) How realistic is the budget Budget Merit 20 points

  11. Peer Reviewers Input Peer Reviewer More than 30.000 data points 12000 Pages of Comments Comments on each Criterion Possible Budget Reduction Special Comments to QNRF Scores: 2 3 4 5 Recommend: Fund / Not Fund 1

  12. Typical Score Matrix Mean 86 87 86 17 15 17 9 10 19 87 Median

  13. Median vs. Mean Score Distribution

  14. NPRP 5th Cycle Outcome

  15. 14 23% 145 82 121.3 NPRP 4 NPRP 5th Cycle Outcome 140.5 Budget (Million USD) Cut-off Score 82 Funded Projects 156 25% Success Rate Awarded Institutions 22 NPRP 5

  16. 38 63 30 3 6 16

  17. in Alphabetical Order NPRP 5th Cycle Awarded Institutions

  18. Academic New Awarded Institution Total No. of Vetted Proposals: 3 No. of Proposals Passed Screening: 2 Awarded: 1 (Success Rate: 50%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 0.92M

  19. Government New Awarded Institution Total No. of vetted Proposals: 1 No. of Proposals Passed Screening: 1 Awarded: 1 (Success Rate: 100%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 0.59M

  20. Private Total No. of vetted Proposals:9 No. of Proposals Passed Screening: 5 Awarded: 1 (Success Rate: 20%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 0.95M

  21. Academic Total No. of vetted Proposals: 17 No. of Proposals Passed Screening: 17 Awarded: 4 (Success Rate: 24%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 3.16M

  22. Academic Total No. of vetted Proposals: 6 No. of Proposals Passed Screening: 6 Awarded: 1 (Success Rate: 17%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 0.98M

  23. Private New Awarded Institution Total No. of vetted Proposals: 2 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:2 Awarded: 1 (Success Rate: 50%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 0.62M

  24. Private Total No. of vetted Proposals: 13 No. of Proposals Passed Screening: 13 Awarded: 2 (Success Rate: 15%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 1.46M

  25. Private New Awarded Institution Total No. of vetted Proposals: 4 No. of Proposals Passed Screening: 4 Awarded: 1 (Success Rate: 25%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 1.02M

  26. Academic Total No. of vetted Proposals: 6 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:6 Awarded: 3 (Success Rate: 50%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 2.20M

  27. Government New Awarded Institution Total No. of Proposals: 14 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:14 Awarded: 2 (Success Rate: 14 %) Total Fund Awarded: $US 1.80M

  28. Government Total No. of vetted Proposals: 50 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:47 Awarded: 12 (Success Rate: 26 %) Total Fund Awarded: $US 11.4M

  29. Government New Awarded Institution Total No. of vetted Proposals: 11 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:10 Awarded: 2 (Success Rate: 20%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 1.39M

  30. Government New Awarded Institution Department of Animal Resources Total No. of vetted Proposals: 3 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:3 Awarded: 1 (Success Rate: 33%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 1.04M

  31. NGO New Awarded Institution Total No. of vetted Proposals: 7 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:7 Awarded: 3 (Success Rate: 43 %) Total Fund Awarded: $US 1.81M

  32. NGO Total No. of vetted Proposals: 3 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:3 Awarded: 2 (Success Rate: 67 %) Total Fund Awarded: $US 1.99M

  33. Academic Total No. of Proposals: 314 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:290 Awarded: 62 (Success Rate: 21%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 54M

  34. NGO New Awarded Institution Total No. of Proposals: 2 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:2 Awarded: 1 (Success Rate: 50%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 0.73M

  35. Academic Total No. of vetted Proposals:111 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:109 Awarded: 39 (Success Rate: 36%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 38.75M

  36. Academic New Awarded Institution University College London - Qatar Total No. of vetted Proposals:6 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:6 Awarded: 2 (Success Rate: 33%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 1.89M

  37. Academic Total No. of vetted Proposals:1 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:1 Awarded: 1 (Success Rate: 100%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 0.80M

  38. Academic Virginia Commonwealth University - Qatar Total No. of vetted Proposals:8 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:8 Awarded: 1 (Success Rate: 13%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 0.33M

  39. Academic Total No. of vetted Proposals:36 No. of Proposals Passed Screening:35 Awarded: 13 (Success Rate: 37%) Total Fund Awarded: $US 12.55M

  40. Awarded Sectors QF Share: $US 63.6M (45% of the total awarded fund)

  41. Impact of QNRF Funding

  42. I- Research Culture Well developed Legal Framework for Funding 2 Well Established Funding Policies 1 Transparency & Equal Opportunity 4 Robust Peer Reviewing Process 3

  43. Research Funding Programs II- Sustainability 1 Secondary School Students Theme 2 Undergraduate Students NPRP-EP 3 Graduate Students 4 Junior Scientists NPRP JSREP 5 Established Scientists GREP 6 Exceptional Scientists UREP Multidisciplinary Research Team 7 SSREP

  44. 66 2008 2009 2010 2011 III- Building Research Infrastructure Number of Research Offices inside Qatar 55 Academic 14 33 19 Government 17 Private 11 NGOs 24

  45. IV- International Visibility

  46. QNRF International Outreach - 5 NPRP cycles

  47. Regional Visibility: MENA Region

  48. MENA Region– Example of Institutes

  49. V- Building Research Human Capital through NPRP 67% from total effort is done inside Qatar 74% from total fund is spent inside Qatar

More Related