140 likes | 306 Views
CMSD Master Planning. KEY POINTS. No schools to close for several years All funding is tied to enrollment counts The Master Plan will be reviewed and updated each year. PRE ISSUE 14 (MAY 2001). 2001 CMSD student enrollment was 77,000 students
E N D
KEY POINTS • No schools to close for several years • All funding is tied to enrollment counts • The Master Plan will be reviewed and updated each year.
PRE ISSUE 14 (MAY 2001) • 2001 CMSD student enrollment was 77,000 students • There was a drastic need to fix crumbling buildings….Plain Dealer January 23, 2001. • OSFC Classroom Facilities Assistance Program was not in effect • Issue 14 raised $335 million to repair most drastic conditions (failed boilers, failed roof and windows, repair out of service plumbing and electrical equipment. • Charter School Enrollment was 2,887 students
POST ISSUE 14 PASSAGE • OSFC building condition assessments were completed January 2002 • CMSD/OSFC Master Plan was agreed to May 2002 • Master Plan enrollment multiplier was 72,500 based on 2005/2006 projections • In 2004, the build out year was changed from 2005 to 2015/16 state-wide • Cleveland Charter School enrollment grew to 19,000 in 2007 • State-wide urban enrollment demographics are triggering declines • Inflation factors have increased the cost of building schools
Critical District Master Planning Objectives • Strive to retain public school infrastructure to accommodate students returning to CMSD • Requires that the current tax rate for the Project be maintained (no increase in the tax rate is anticipated) • Maximize number of neighborhood schools with attention on Academic Neighborhoods (defined as individual High School catchment areas) • Overwhelming percentage of K-8 students (at least 95%) to walk less than 1 mile along safe route to a new, renovated or maintained school • Create future flexibility for possible grade configuration changes with at least one large K-8 in each academic neighborhood • Right size schools for the expected population with options to respond to both greater or lesser than expected enrollment in 2015-16 • Strive for 1 geo-thermal heating system per academic neighborhood and design to LEED (Leadership In Energy & Environmental Design) Objectives. • All schools will have Pre Kindergarten space • Provide for a 20:1 Student to Teacher ratio grades Pre-K thru Grade 3
Critical District Master Planning Objectives – cont. • No Schools to close for several years • Schools not receiving OSFC dollars will be maintained by the District • If enrollment grows, other schools can be added to the State co-funded construction program • Master Plan can be adjusted to changing enrollment or academic program information • Maintain all comprehensive High Schools • Focus on City-wide draw High Schools (Max Hayes and Cleveland School of Arts in Segment 5 with design beginning fall 2007) • CMSD stakeholders can help by: • Listening & understanding Master Plan information • Communicating concerns in a constructive manner • Working constructively to relocate during construction • Help in growing enrollment
Decision Factors Enrollment Data CMSD Factors Regulations or Regulatory Policy Factors Facility Assessment Factors Funding Factors Constructability Factors
Enrollment Data • Live Birth Data • District Enrollment Statistics • Community School Enrollment • Changes in Program Offerings • Change in Grade Configuration • Zoning Changes • Planned but not Built Housing • Open Enrollment Impact on One School to Another • Housing Activity • Boundary Adjustments • Pre-school Programs • Employment Shifts • Magnet/Charter/Private School - Opening or Closure
CMSD Factors • Neighborhood Student Enrollment • Academic Performance • Special Education Requirements • Safety & Security Requirements • Safe Walking Routes • Nearby Schools & Special Programs • Community Engagement Feedback • Community Use Plans • External Assistance Opportunities • Consequence to future administrations • Current Building Capacity • Building Conditions • Legal Obligations NCLB & IDEA* • Labor Contract Obligations • School Distance • Student Transportation Needs • Strategic Planning Goals & Objectives • Cost Management • Swing Space Availability & User Acceptance • LFI Impact • Option School Expansion • Opportunity for Partnering with Other Organizations * NCLB - No Child Left Behind * IDEA - Individual with Disabilities Education Act
Regulations or Regulatory Policy Factors • Ohio Revised Code • Ohio School Design Manual • Ohio Basic Building Code • City of Cleveland Planning Commission • OSFC Career Technical Supplement • OSFC Policies • City of Cleveland Building Codes
Facility Assessment Factors • OSFC 2/3rds rule • City Landmarking of Buildings • OSFC 350 Rule • Facility Condition Index & Learning Environment Ratings
Funding Factors • Construction Cost Determination • Regional Cost Trends • Determination of District Share • Project Cash Flow • Real Estate Acquisition Costs • Renovation Cost Determination • Construction Budget • District Funding Sources (Bonds, Donations) • Facility Condition Index • Availability of Local Funds
Constructability Factors • Greenfield or Brownfield Site • Neighborhood Infrastructure • Construction Market Conditions • Available Construction Capacity • Winter Conditions • Topography issues • Acreage Size to Support Total School Operations • Construction Footprint Space Availability • Real Estate Availability & Acquisition Timing • Previous Construction Decisions • Opening Timing (new schools and swing sites) • Water, Electricity, Gas, Drainage Availability
Enrollment Projections • High School • Handout • K-8 • Handout