1 / 16

Continuing Professional Development for prescribing

Continuing Professional Development for prescribing. Why do we need specific CPD for prescribers?. Trust assurance and safety (DOH 2007) Public Confidence Professional Credibility Patient Safety NMC competency Confidence to Prescribe Clinical Governance and Audit. What is competency?.

yeo-harper
Download Presentation

Continuing Professional Development for prescribing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Continuing Professional Development for prescribing Karen Ford, February 2010

  2. Why do we need specific CPD for prescribers? • Trust assurance and safety (DOH 2007) • Public Confidence • Professional Credibility • Patient Safety • NMC competency • Confidence to Prescribe • Clinical Governance and Audit Karen Ford, February 2010

  3. What is competency? • What qualities delineate being a competent prescriber for you? Karen Ford, February 2010

  4. NPC 2006 definition • A competency is a quality or characteristic of a person which is related to effective or superior performance. Competencies can be described as a combination of knowledge, skills, motives and personal traits. Competencies help individuals (and their managers) look at how they do their jobs. Karen Ford, February 2010

  5. What the non-medical prescribers say they want • Latter et al’s (2006)Survey: • 66% receiving support/supervision • 95% undertaking self-directed activity • 50% have formal professional development opportunities • But 50% said they need CPD that is ongoing • 84% identified Pharmacology as their main concern • 40% identified skill areas in practice not provided by undertakig the prescribing course alone e.g. advanced clinical skills; pharmacology & physical assessment skills Karen Ford, February 2010

  6. Oxford experienceWaite & Keenan 2010 • prescribers bring in case studies and a pharmacist is invited to group covers: • Pharmacology • Updates on anything new/changed • Also group discuss updating NMC portfolio for prescribing • Competency maintained by peer review Karen Ford, February 2010

  7. Individual - NMC PREP Trust/employer (DOH 2004) Employers responsibility – access to CPD through staff appraisal (NMC 2006) Organisations must provide CPD for non-medical prescribers (DOH 2006) Whose responsibility is it? Karen Ford, February 2010

  8. What form should this CPD take? • Compulsory or voluntary? • Frequency? • Location? • Formal or informal? • Rolling agenda? • Annual numeracy test? • Portfolio that manger reviews? • Write a certain amount of prescriptions per year? • On line resources – Waite & Keenan 2010 Karen Ford, February 2010

  9. Resources available • NPC competency workshops • NPC website • Connecting prescribers newsletter • Email alerts • Short updates • Support groups for nurse, AHP and pharmacist prescribers • Reflection • Audit/PACT data • Blogs • MDT meetings • Medics • BNF,NICE,CKS, SIGN, NSF’s • Courses & conferences • Critical incident analysis • Self Assessment via a diary Karen Ford, February 2010

  10. Resources available • Specialist groups e.g. dermatology • Clinic visits • Appraisal • CD roms • ANP & journal • DOH – non-medical prescribers section • Being Observed • Practice Review • In-house training • Mentoring • Protected time • Journals e.g. Nurse Prescribing • NMC 2008 Guidance for CPD for Nurse and Midwife prescribers • 360O Appraisal (Hobden 2007) Karen Ford, February 2010

  11. Key Documents Available from National Prescribing Centre www.npc.nhs.uk For Nurses NPC (2001) Maintaining competency in prescribing. An outline framework to help nurse prescribers 1st edition November NPC For Pharmacists NPC (2006) Maintaining Competency in Prescribing An outline framework to help pharmacist prescribers 2nd edition October. For Allied Health Professionals NPC (2004) Maintaining Competence in Prescribing. An outline framework to help Allied Health Professional Supplementary Prescribers 1st edition July Karen Ford, February 2010

  12. Conflicts as a prescriber • Inter-professional • Lack of support • Showing you are credible • Limited CPD budgets • Lack of own confidence • Poor access to resources e.g. Athens account/Library resources • Poor quality data • Access to a computer • Communication barriers between primary and secondary care • Systems not in place e.g. electronic prescriptions Karen Ford, February 2010

  13. References DOH (2007) DOH (2006) DOH (2004) Hobden (2007) Latter et al (2006) NMC (2006) Waite & Keenan (2010) Karen Ford, February 2010

  14. Further reading • Bramley I (2006) Continuing Professional Development: what is it and how do I get it? Nurse Prescribing 4 (3) pp117-120 • Hobden A (2007) Continuing Professional Development for nurse prescribers Nurse Prescribing5 (4) pp153-155 • Ford K & Otway C (2008)Health visitor prescribing: the need for CPD Nurse Prescribing 6 (9) pp397-403 Karen Ford, February 2010

  15. Additional Reading • Latter S. MabenJ. Myall M & Young A.(2007) Evaluating Nurse Prescribers’ education and continuing professional development for independent prescribing practice: Findings from a national survey in England Nurse Education Today27 pp685-696 • Waite M & Keenan J (2010) CPD for Non-Medical Prescribers A Practical Guide Wiley Radcliffe: West Sussex Karen Ford, February 2010

  16. This work was produced as part of the TIGER project and funded by JISC and the HEA in 2011. For further information see: http://www.northampton.ac.uk/tiger. This work by TIGER Project is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Based on a work at tiger.library.dmu.ac.uk. The TIGER project has sought to ensure content of the materials comply with a CC BY NC SA licence. Some material links to third party sites and may use a different licence, please check before using. The TIGER project nor any of its partners endorse these sites and cannot be held responsible for their content. Any logos or trademarks in the resource are exclusive property of their owners and their appearance is not an endorsement by the TIGER project. Karen Ford, February 2010

More Related