110 likes | 331 Views
So Goes the Nation? Salmon Recovery in the Pacific Northwest Glenn Vanselow Pacific Northwest Waterways Association National Waterways Conference Portland, OR September 8, 2006. Columbia Basin Tour. ESA Listings in the PNW. 26 Northwest fish runs listed under ESA
E N D
So Goes the Nation?Salmon Recovery in thePacific NorthwestGlenn VanselowPacific Northwest Waterways AssociationNational Waterways ConferencePortland, ORSeptember 8, 2006
ESA Listings in the PNW • 26 Northwest fish runs listed under ESA • Northern California to Canadian border • 1989: First ESA petitions • 1991: First listings: 3 Snake River runs • 1995: First Biological Opinion • Challenged/rejected in court • 2000: Biological Opinion • Challenged/rejected in court • 2004: Biological Opinion • Challenged/rejected in court • 2006: River Operations • Set in court by judge’s order
ESA Listings: The Side Effects • Clean Water Act lawsuit • Challenged river operations and the existence of the dams • Snake River dredging lawsuits • Court prohibited dredging twice • Third lawsuit settled (with help from PNWA) • Columbia River channel deepening lawsuit • Challenged Biological Opinion and Corps’ economic analysis • Appellate Court allows project to proceed • Corps permits delayed • More projects subject to review • Higher level of scrutiny • More resource agency coordination
ESA Listings: The Side Effects • Irrigation water withdrawals challenged • Withdrawals curtailed • Hydropower system cutbacks • Hydro is 64% of region’s power supply • Flow augmentation • Spill programs • Hydropower rates increased • 25% of PNW power rates are fish costs • Navigation threatened • 50 Million tons per year, Columbia River • $16 Billion in international trade • 10-12 Million tons per year, barged • $2 Billion in cargo value
ESA Listings: The Side Effects • Bonneville Power Administration Rate Impacts
ESA Listings: The Side Effects • Cost to PNW ratepayers (not the federal government): $8 billion
Navigation & Power Benefits Threatened • 26 Northwest fish runs listed under ESA • Northern California to Canadian border • 13 are Columbia Basin runs • 4 are lower river runs • They do not pass any dams • 5 are upper Columbia runs • They do not pass any Snake River dams • Only 4 of the 26 pass Snake River dams • Yet, Snake River dams are under attack • Environmental groups, some NW tribes say: • “Breach the four Snake River dams” • Members of Congress join in: • 85 cosponsor Salmon Planning Act (authorizes breaching the Snake River dams) • 103 sign Blumenauer-Petri letter (asks NOAA to analyze breaching)
Dam Breaching is Not the Answer • Record fish runs in last five years • Juvenile survival is 3 times higher than 1970s • When dam breaching was first proposed • Juvenile survival continues to improve • 2006 highest on record • Survival is higher today than before the Snake River dams were built • Source: NOAA Fisheries
Dam Breaching is Not the Answer • It is bad for the environment • It shuts down the cleanest, most fuel-efficient transportation mode • It shuts down hydropower: clean, renewable and zero air emissions • It is bad for the economy • Loss of navigation • Loss of hydropower • Loss of irrigated agriculture • It will not help the fish • Only 4 of 26 listed runs • No demonstrated benefit • Possible harm Photos from 1992 Snake River drawdown test
Contact Information:glenn.vanselow@pnwa.netwww.pnwa.netClick on: Action AgendaThen: Fact Sheets