230 likes | 451 Views
Introduction/Overview. Introduction/OverviewBriefly: author's experiences with reforming HETransformations of HE: globalTransformations of HE: the European UnionTransformations of HE: CEE countriesSome statistics: CEE and SEETwo major reform agendas in transition countries today: global (Worl
E N D
1. Reforming Higher Education: Lessons Learned from the Transition Countries Prof. Marek Kwiek
Center for Public Policy
Poznan University, Poznan, Poland
kwiekm@amu.edu.pl
www.policy.hu/kwiek
2. Introduction/Overview Introduction/Overview
Briefly: author’s experiences with reforming HE
Transformations of HE: global
Transformations of HE: the European Union
Transformations of HE: CEE countries
Some statistics: CEE and SEE
Two major reform agendas in transition countries today:
global (World Bank, OECD, development agencies)
European (Bologna Process and European Research Area)
3. Introduction/Overview
Reforming HE in transition / EU countries: differences
Lessons Learned
Discussion, questions & answers
4. HE transformations: global (1) HE more influential than ever before for the economic growth of nations and regions
Passage from industrial (work-based) to postindustrial (knowledge-based) economies and societies (OECD)
Consequently, knowledge viewed as the major driver of economic development
Old and new challenges in HE. Old challenges include:
shifting from elite to mass (expanded) systems under severe resource constraints
inequality of access and opportunities
5. HE transformations: global (2) low quality and relevance of education to the labor market
rigid governance and administrative structures
inability (or unwillingness) of governments to finance expanding public HE
inability (or unwilingness) of governments to finance ever-expanding research in public sector institutions (partnerships)
New challenges in HE:
crucial role of knowledge production, dissemination and application for “knowledge-driven societies”
consequently, HE in the center of public scrutiny (nationally, regionally, and globally) – EU, WB, OECD, IMF, WTO etc.
emergence of powerful market forces
6. HE transformations: global (3) unprecedented growth of new for profit and virtual providers in HE (consortia, franchises, corporate universities; foreign/ borderless institutions
unprecedented differentiation of HE (from community colleges to elite institutions)
rapidly changing demographics (EU, CEEs – and Balkans)
globalization of economies and cultures
internationalization of academic disciplines and research communities
rapid spread of the English language
advent of new technologies (especially telecommunications)
7. HE transformations: global (4) New challenges for HE in more general terms mean:
new questions asked: „What is it that society needs from higher education? - and no longer „What is it that higher education needs from society?”
radical move away from the state and more reliance on the market, for both teaching, research and service functions
changing social status of the academic profession (from “Herr Professor” to „knowledge analyst”), changing working conditions
commodification of research, marketization of educational offer, corporatization of academic governance and management structures (collegiality vs. CEO/corporate models; managerialism)
diversification - growth of the private sector
8. HE transformations: global (5) research - increasingly goes to the corporate sector (EU goal - 3% of GDP for research - but increase from private funds, and considerably for the private R&Dstudents - increasingly „consumers”, HE institutons - „providers” of services tighter links between university/corporations/military
Unfortunately, the transition countries today face both old and new challenges at the same time! Western European countries faced old challenges 20-30 years ago, when they moved towards mass systems of HE. HE is working increasingly under both types of pressures.
9. HE transformations:European Union (1) Majority of aspects of global transformations present - but in softened versions
Majority of aspects of global transformations confirmed in the „Lisbon strategy” (2000): to make Europe by 2010 „the most competitive economy in the world”
Consequently, emergent „European Research Area” (ERA) and increasingly Bologna - directed to economic goals
„European Welfare Model” in conflict with the global market orientation of HE (but not of research)
Bologna process for EU countries - to make EHEA compe-
10. HE transformations:European Union (2) titive to American and Australasian HE, to have bigger share in global market of international students
current transformations of HE mean: highly skilled professional workforce for the new „knowledge-economy”; comparability of educational outputs and diplommas across Europe; mobility of graduates and workforce; growing employability of graduates
next moves: pan-European - accreditation schemes, quality assurance, framework of qualifications, and descriptions of educational outputs” and „competencies”
11. HE transformations: Central Europe (1) Three dimensions of wider social transformations relevant for HE in transition countries:
move from totalitarianism/communism to free, open democracies
move from centrally-planned to market economies
move towards integrated Europe and global economy
Different degrees of the above in Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Balkans
In CEE, mixed policy influences of the EU and transnational/American developmental (USAID) and lending (World Bank, IMF) agencies
12. HE transformations: Central Europe (2) Majority: welfare reforms closer to neoliberal recommendations than to EU „welfare model” (healthcare, pensions, higher education): development of private provision, freezing of welfare expenditures, freezing of public budgets as lending conditionalities etc
Higher education in CEE witnessed:
getting rid of politics from HE institutions
huge increase in enrolments, accompanied by constant number of faculty
generally, (relative) pauperization of the academic profession
diversification of levels and modes of study
huge increase in a number of institutions
13. HE transformations: Central Europe (3) booming of the private sector (in some countries)
steadily decreasing public funds for research and students’ assistance
reform attempts along „Bologna lines”, including new laws on HE
development of rigid accreditation procedures, both state and independent (Rectors’ Conferences, business associations etc)
highly increased exchange of students and faculty with EU countries (EU projects)
full access (for EU-accession countries) to EU research programs
the net result of these transformations in shown in enrolment rates below (Poland as an example from CEE):
14. Student enrolments (global comparison)
15. Number of students per 100,000 (SEE)
16. Number of students per 100,000 (CEE)
17. Student enrolments - Kosova, in thousands (1970-2003)
18. Transition countries: agendas for reforms (1) Two major agendas: transnational and EU
Transnational reform agendas for HE set by the WB and OECD, within wider reforms of the state
the minimal state: provides an „enabling framework” for functioning of the market forces and competition between (private) providers
privatization (in the long run) of major welfare services: healthcare, pensions, (higher) education
the burden off the state’s shoulders (and to users of services)
to keep budget deficits as low as possible, lower taxes etc
to downsize the public sector
HE seen more as a private good, not a public good (also: WTO)
19. Transition countries: agendas for reforms (2) EU reform agendas for EU accession countries similar to the transnational agenda in general
for HE, crucial role of Bologna process and ERA: towards Europe of Knowledge, research for applications, institutions for students employability
traditional EU concerns about the „European welfare model” generally irrelevant for EU-accession countries
Bologna process crucial: new European framework for reforms
ERA crucial: access to research funds (16 billion EUR 2004-08)
20. Transition countries: agendas for reforms (3) necessity: to combine transnational views of downsizing the public sector (no resources available soon, growing other social and economic needs; taxation) and European views of HE crucial for economic growth (future common European labor market)
HE will be competing strongly with other sectors for shrinking public funds. Private funds fo HE grew faster than public funds in all major OECD economies
21. Reforming HE in transition / EU countries: differences reforms in transition countries / EU countries are:
deep / part of an organic process of evolution
high speed needed to avoid collapse / moderate speed
part of overall reform agendas / relatively independent
structural, systemic / piecemeal, bit by bit
under severe budget constraints/ in still affluent societies
under pressure to increase enrolments/ no similar pressures
towards postindustrial societies / already in „knowledge-societies”
22. Lessons learned HE systems in transition countries must:
successfully compete with other sectors for public funds (expect less)
radically differentiate its institutions and modes of delivery
develop the private sector (in the absence of accessible, adaptable public providers)
radically reform curricula for the labor market needs
radically increase enrolments (high social and public returns from HE)
have clear accreditation schemes and quality assurance systems
closely follow European developments (Bologna and ERA) and adapt what is best for local needs
see comprehensive reforms as a very long-term process
23. Thank you very much for your attention, let us remember that:
„Changing a university is difficult. It is like moving a cemetary; hard work and there is no internal support”, Clark Kerr