1 / 9

CDTI Subgroup (SC-186, WG-1 SG) Status

CDTI Subgroup (SC-186, WG-1 SG) Status. Sethu Rathinam Randy Bone Jonathan Hammer (Presented to SC-147). Status. CDTI Subgroup was re-activated in Winter 2003 Meetings in Oct 2003, Jan 2004, March 2004 Teleconferences between meetings At least one, more planned

yvonne
Download Presentation

CDTI Subgroup (SC-186, WG-1 SG) Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CDTI Subgroup (SC-186, WG-1 SG)Status Sethu Rathinam Randy Bone Jonathan Hammer (Presented to SC-147)

  2. Status • CDTI Subgroup was re-activated in Winter 2003 • Meetings in Oct 2003, Jan 2004, March 2004 • Teleconferences between meetings • At least one, more planned • Support from several organizations, including Govt. and Industry • Boeing, Rockwell Collins, Honeywell, MITRE, NASA, GarminAT, UPS, Delta/ALPA, … (not a full list)

  3. Status • CDTI scope • All traffic (from different sensors) on the same display • Includes TCAS traffic • Also ADS-B and TIS-B traffic • “TCAS only” displays not prohibited by ASAS MOPS • Naturally “TCAS only” display will be required to meet the TCAS MOPS

  4. CDTI Requirements: Overview Application Description & Tech Requirements Selected Applications (RTCA,…) Pre Y2000, informal More Formal, post Y2000 Draft CDTI Appendix (not included in ASA MASPS) (WG-4, WG-1) CDTI MOPS draft (June 2001) (WG-1) ASA MASPS (WG-1/WG-4) Draft: Consensus Needed Derive Reqs, New text required Existing, may need changes Other Guidance And Requirements Feedback as required ASAS MOPS CDTI (WG-1) STP, ASSAP (WG-4) Sethu Rathinam, 28 Apr 2004

  5. CDTI MOPS Requirements Process • Collect existing documents to derive/copy CDTI requirements • Perform review • Survey related industry (standards, designs, regulatory) documents and activity • Create issues list for CDTI, collect major and minor issues • Discussion of issues, general consensus on direction and scope • Create detailed issue papers • Discuss issue papers, capture all relevant information (decisions, consensus, disagreements, …)

  6. CDTI MOPS Requirements Process • Make writing assignments from mature issue papers • If non-issue or minor issue, writing assignments start early • Disagreements  Surveys, lab evaluations, … • May result in consensus conclusion • Disagreement may continue (state this in a note on the MOPS) • Review written draft material in group, refine • Capture the essence of requirements in group meeting (framework, external requirements) • Prefer no writing “as a group” – assignments will be for 1-3 people, to be reviewed in group meetings or telecons • Merge with ASSAP and STP documentation as ASAS MOPS • Review with WG-4 • [Rest of RTCA Process: Final draft, editorial committee, final version, send out for vote, …]

  7. CDTI: Issues • Several issues remain to be discussed relating to TCAS • CDTI will have no effect on how TCAS guidance is displayed (no changes) • CDTI will have no effect on TCAS aural alerts • Needs group discussion with SC-147 in case exceptions are needed • CDTI will display traffic from TCAS sensor in addition to ADS-B and TIS-B sensors • Display “fusion” issues remain to be worked out • Help and participation from SC-147 is solicited • Work on issue papers has begun • Should TCAS position or other position information be used for display purposes? • What criteria should be used to choose the position information? • How should “combined” symbols be displayed when data from traffic is received from more than one source (in addition to TCAS) under no alert, TA and RA situations? • How should the ASAS architecture accommodate TCAS under standard conditions and under various ASSAP failure modes? • Hybrid surveillance (ICAO definition) will have no impact on CDTI • Transparent to the pilots

  8. CDTI: Issues • Several other CDTI related issues remain to be worked out • We are in the process of identifying and documenting issues in issue papers • Input is solicited from SC-147 on issues of common issues interest, relating to TCAS being displayed on CDTI

  9. SC-186 Relevant Contact Information • Sethu Rathinam [CDTI SG of WG-1] srrathin@rockwellcollins.com • Randy Bone [WG-1 including CDTI] bone@mitre.org • Jonathan Hammer [WG-4 including ASSAP] jhammer@mitre.org

More Related