1 / 10

SC-214/WG-78 SG-3 Protocol Interoperability Communication Specifications for Advanced Services

SC-214/WG-78 SG-3 Protocol Interoperability Communication Specifications for Advanced Services. Plenary 6: 8 – 12 December 2008 Toulouse, France. About this presentation. Work has started in October 2008 (SG-3 WG, Melbourne) 1 meeting and 3 telecons

giza
Download Presentation

SC-214/WG-78 SG-3 Protocol Interoperability Communication Specifications for Advanced Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SC-214/WG-78 SG-3Protocol Interoperability Communication Specifications for Advanced Services Plenary 6: 8 – 12 December 2008Toulouse, France

  2. About this presentation • Work has started in October 2008 (SG-3 WG, Melbourne) • 1 meeting and 3 telecons • Aligning with ATN and FANS Interop Documents • Version 0.7 available for SC/WG review • Main Changes • Support of Messaging/Parameters for ATN and FANS Backwards Accommodation.

  3. Main changes with respect to ED-110B/DO-280B • Sections • Introduction • Definition of Accommodation • Editorial notes • CM section • Some Updates • ADS section • Blank section – Future Work • CPDLC section • Major work area • FIS section • Editorial but no changes – Future Work

  4. INTRODUCTION 1 – INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 Operational Classification Added definitions and clarifications about document editors note of intent to remove ED-110B columns from Table for final version 1.1.2 ASN.1 Classification Added clarifications about applicability

  5. ATN CM 2 – CM P/OICS Changes Configuration and Services Section SC-214 Profile defined Messages Section Table Headers re-labelled ED-110B IMP BC identified Parameters Section ED-110B IMP BC identified

  6. ATN ADS B.3 – ADS P/OICS Changes No section Future work for WP2

  7. ATN CPDLC B.4 – CPDLC P/OICS Configuration and Services Section Identified SC-214 Profile Messages Section Table ASN.1’s definitions aligned with ATN definition SC-214 Profile Generated ED-110B IMP BC generated FANS 1/A BC generated (M-4 and M-6) M-4 & M-6 are necessary but other M and P tables should not have this column. M-5 Uplink User Message Elements and Permitted Operational Responses removed M-7 Downlink User Message Elements and Permitted Operational Responses removed Parameters Section SC-214 Profile Generated ED-110B IMP BC generated FANS 1/A BC – not clear that these parameter definitions are applicable to FANS! new tables generated based on SC-214 Profile and ATN definitions (Tables P-3A, P5A, P19C, P24A)

  8. ATN FIS B.5 – FIS P/OICS Changes Waiting for Maturation of FIS ASN.1 before starting work Configuration and Services Section no work (OPLINKP column header re-labelled to SC-214) Messages Section no work (OPLINKP column header re-labelled to SC-214) Parameters Section no work (OPLINKP column header re-labelled to SC-214)

  9. D-ATIS Template Template for D-ATIS no template

  10. Questions for Plenary • Are the PICS backwards compatibility aligned with what Europe implemented or with a document on one implemented? • Should the tables show ED-110B BC or ED-110B IMP BC for backwards compatibility? • ED-110B/DO-280 had this document as an attachment. Due to the addition of backwards compatibility for FANS, how should this document be handled (attachment to what)? • Should we have FANS 1/A BC columns only in M4 and M6 Tables? • Should we keep ED-110B columns (current intent is to remove ED-110B columns at the final version and keep the ED-110B IMP BC in CM sections)?

More Related