1 / 34

Repeated Measures ANOVA Two-Factor ANOVA

Repeated Measures ANOVA Two-Factor ANOVA. Introduction to Statistics Chapter 14 Apr 16-21, 2009 Classes #25-26. Recalling between vs. within subject distinction…. Difference between?

zareh
Download Presentation

Repeated Measures ANOVA Two-Factor ANOVA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Repeated Measures ANOVATwo-Factor ANOVA Introduction to Statistics Chapter 14 Apr 16-21, 2009 Classes #25-26

  2. Recalling between vs. within subject distinction… • Difference between? • When we have a within subjects design (e.g., repeated measures, matched subjects), can’t use one-way ANOVA from last chapter • That ANOVA assumes each observation is independent • Within-subjects design = non-independent observations (e.g., same person answering questions over time  each response from same person will be related)

  3. Repeated Measures ANOVA Reaction Time Study - could be modified into RM design by having one group of subjects perform under all conditions Main effects – the effect of 1 IV on 1 DV Interactions – the effect of multiple IV’s on 1 DV

  4. Repeated Measures ANOVA “Within-subjects” design - subjects are measured on DV more than once as in training studies or learning studies Advantages increased power - due to decreased variance can use smaller sample sizes allows for study over time

  5. Repeated Measures ANOVA Disadvantages carryover effects - early treatments affect later ones. practice effects - subjects’ experience with test can influence their score on the DV. fatigue sensitization - subjects’ awareness of treatment is heightened due to repeated exposure to test.

  6. The strength of a within subjects design • Key to statistics = see where variability is coming from • Less noise have to deal with, the better – easier for the picture of the data to come through • Same person answers questions multiple times  variability that’s unique to that person is constant across each participant  less noise in the data

  7. Comparing repeated ANOVA with one-way ANOVA • Still involves F ratio • Still same interpretation – greater than 1 = more variance due to condition than to error • But variance due to participant is removed from the model •  F = variance between conditions, divided by amount of variance would expect by chance (excluding variance due to individual differences – error variance, or residual variance)

  8. In other words • F captures how much signal there is (how much difference across conditions) compared to noise (how much variability there is that can’t be explained by individual differences) • = MS between conditions / MS error

  9. Step 1:Set Hypothesis • STEP 1: State the Hypothesis • H0: m1 = m2 = m3 = m4 • HA : m1≠ m2≠m3≠ m4

  10. Step 2: Determining F-critical • See p. 533 • a = .01 (boldface) or .05 (lightface) • Numerator = df between treatments • Denominator = df error

  11. Step 3: STAGE 1 • SSbetween treatments = (T2/n) – (G2/N) • SSwithin treatments = SS inside each treatment = (SS1+SS2+SS3+...+SSk) • SStotal = X2 – (G2/N) or SSbetween + SSwithin n = # of scores in a tx condition N = total # of scores in whole study T = sum of scores for each tx condition G = sum of all scores in the study (Grand Total)

  12. Step 3: STAGE 1 • Calculate dfbetween treatments = k – 1 • Calculate dfwithin treatments = dfinside each treatment • Calculate dftotal = N-1 • dfbetween + dfwithin = dftotal k = number of factor levels n = number of scores in a treatment condition N = total number of scores in whole study (N = nk) T = sum of scores for each treatment condition G = sum of all scores in the study (Grand Total)

  13. Step 3: STAGE 2 • SSbetween subjects = p2 - G2 k N • SSerror = SSwithin treatments - SSbetween treatments • dfbetween subjects = n – 1 • dferror = dfwithin treatments - dfbetween subjects

  14. Step 3: STAGE 3F-ratio calculation • For numerator: • MSbetween treatments = SS between treatments df between treatments

  15. STEP 3: STAGE 3F-ratio calculation • For denominator: • MSerror = SS error df error

  16. STEP 3: STAGE 3F-ratio calculation • Fcalculated = MS between treatments MS error

  17. Step 4: Summary table and decision Source SS df MS F Between treatments Within treatments Between Subjects Error Total

  18. The similarity in logic continues… • Effect size: • measured by eta squared, still captures proportion of variability that’s explained by condition n2= SS between treatments between treatments + SS error

  19. The similarities continue… • To report in APA style: • F (df numerator, df denominator) = value, p information • df numerator = number conditions – 1 • df denominator = error df = df total – df numerator

  20. Effect size n2 = SS between treatments = SS between treatments SS between treat + SS within treat SS total

  21. Still need post hoc tests • Still have options such as Tukey and Scheffé

  22. Two-Factor ANOVA • In Chapter 13, we looked at ANOVAs with several levels of one IV • Here, we are looking at ANOVAs with several levels of more two IVs • We will now be looking at three types of mean differences within this analysis

  23. Main Effects • The mean differences that might among the levels of each factor (IV) • The mean differences of the rows (IV1) • The mean differences of the columns (IV2)

  24. STEP 1: State the Hypotheses for the Main Effects • Null Hyp:H0: µA1 = µA2 • Alternative Hyp: HA: µA1≠ µA2 • Null Hyp:H0: µB1 = µB2 • Alternative Hyp: HA: µB1≠ µB2

  25. Interactions • This occurs when the mean differences between individual treatment conditions (cells) are different than what would be predicted from the overall main effects

  26. STEP 2: State the Hypotheses for the Interactions • H0: There is no interaction between factors A and B. • HA: There is an interaction between factors A and B.

  27. STEP 3: Draw a matrix • This will allow us to determine how many groups we have and where different participants fall within these groups • For an example see page 401

  28. STEP 4: Determine df • dfbetween treatments = number of cells – 1 • dfwithin = dfeach treatment • dftotal = N-1

  29. STEP 5: Stage 1: Analyses • Total Variability: • SStotal = X2 – (G2/N) • Between Treatments Variability • SSbetween treatments = (T2/n) – (G2/N) • Within Treatments Variability • SSwithin treatments = SSeach treatment

  30. STEP 5: Stage 2: Analyses • Factor A: • SSfactor A = (T2ROW/nROW) – (G2/N) • dffactor A = number of rows – 1 • Factor B: • SSfactor B = (T2COL/nCOL) – (G2/N) • dffactor B = number of columns – 1 • A X B Interaction: • SSAXB = SSbetween treatments – SSfactor A – SSfactor B

  31. STEP 6: Calculations for MS and F • MSwithin treatments = SSwithin treat/dfwithin treat • MSA = SSA/dfA • MSB = SSB/dfB • MSAXB = SSAXB/dfAXB

  32. STEP 6: Calculations for MS and F • FA = MSA/MSwithin treatments • FB = MSB/MSwithin treatments • FAXB = MSAXB/MSwithin treatments

  33. Step 7: Summary table and decision Source SS df MS F Between treatments Factor A Factor B A X B Interaction Within treatments Total

  34. Effect Size • For Factor A: • n2 = SSA__________________ SS total – SSB - SSAXB • For Factor B: • n2 = SSB__________________ SS total – SSA - SSAXB • For AXB: • n2 = SSB__________________ SS total – SSA - SSB

More Related