1 / 1

Model Stationarity

Time instance t- 1. Response. Wheat yield Slope Profile Curvature Potassium Phosphorus Nitrogen. Time instance t. Attributes. observed sample. . 1 st order neighborhood. 2 nd order neighborhood. . other sampling locations. 2. 2. 1. 1. p. p. L . L . (t-2) . p =2.

bella
Download Presentation

Model Stationarity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Time instance t-1 Response Wheat yield Slope Profile Curvature Potassium Phosphorus Nitrogen Time instance t Attributes observed sample  1st order neighborhood 2nd order neighborhood  other sampling locations 2 2 1 1 p p L L (t-2)  p=2 (t-1)  t  Sampling instant SPATIAL-TEMPORAL DATA MINING WITH SHORT OBSERVATION HISTORYDragoljub Pokrajac,Zoran Obradovic,Temple University, Philadelphiapokie@ist.temple.edu, zoran@ist.temple.edu Goal 2. Response Modeling • Model Stationarity • Stationarity criterion can be derived from the theory of 3-dimensional filters • For p=1 (process dependent on one step in past), model is stationary iff • Stationarity can be determined from a stationarity plot • Yule-Walker equations • Variance of STUG process • Variance of model error • Yule-Walker estimation • Solving the Yule-Walker equations • Computational complexity O(p2L6 ) • Least-squares estimation • Solving regression system • Computational complexity O( p3L6 ) • Predict future attribute value using • Prediction accuracy measured using coefficient of determination R2 • Agricultural data from 4 years INEEL study • 12 attributes sampled through the year • Goal: Predict 1998 attribute based on measurements from 1995-1997 • Proposed technique can provide useful results Main Properties of Estimator • The proposed technique outperforms non-spatial regression and approaches optimal accuracy • Variance of estimated coefficients decreases with the number of samples, but the estimation remains biased • Simulated agriculture data • 5 attributes and the response on 10*10m2 grid • 5 temporal layers, each with 6561 samples • Using the proposed technique, accuracy of ordinary linear and non-linear models significantly improved • The technique is particularly useful when temporal attributes (e.g. Nitrogen, Phosphorus,…) are missing • Development and comparison of techniques for model identification • Derivation of maximum-likelihood estimation techniques to improve model accuracy • Determination of a close-form expression of STUG model variance as a function of model parameters • Analysis of STUG models stationarity with temporal order p>1 • Spatial-temporal prediction of continuous • Attributes • Response Variable • Agriculture • Crop yield prediction • Treatment recommendation • Remote-sensing • Meteorology • Geo-sciences • Bio-medical applications • Tumor growth prediction • Existing techniques for spatial-temporal modeling • Not suitable for short observation history • Do not involve non-linear modeling • Have difficulties with missing attributes • Spatial-temporal autogressive models of attributes • Spatial-temporal response modeling with correlated residuals • Attribute prediction on spatial-temporal uniform grid • Spatial sampling interval  • Temporal sampling interval  • Spatial order L • Temporal order p • Attribute at each spatial location depends on: • Samples from the same location • Samples from its spatial neighborhood taken in recent history • Spatial-Temporal auto-regressive process on a Uniform Grid (STUG) • Model error Applications Two-Stage Modeling Covariance Structure • Ordinary regression • Spatial-temporal residual regression • Influence of residuals limited to spatial neighborhood • Neighborhood matrix • Homogeneity imposed • Weights depend only on distance, not on the position • Least-squares estimation • Linear • Iterative Gauss-Newton algorithm • Non-linear • Less-demanding one-step algorithm • Ordinary regression at time layers t-1 and t • Estimation of residuals ut and ut-1 • Estimation of W through regression of ut on ut-1 • Prediction accuracy measured using coefficient of determination R2 • Estimation technique evaluated on synthetic data • Varied: • Parameters of • Neighborhood matrix W • Number of samples per spatial layer • Variance of random components 2 • Measured: • Prediction accuracy R2 • Bias and variance of estimated parameters Experiments on Realistic Data Challenges Non-spatial regression model Neighborhood matrix Correlated residuals Uncorrelated errors Solution Model Estimation 1. Attribute Modeling Data from one temporal layer Parameter Estimation Forecasting Experiments on Real-Life Data Evaluation Open Problems References [1] D.Pokrajac, Z.Obradovic, Spatial-Temporal Autoregressive Model on Uniform Sampling Grid, Technical Report CIS TR 2001-05, Temple University, 2001. [2] D.Pokrajac, Z.Obradovic, “Improved Spatial-Temporal Forecasting through Modeling of Spatial Residuals in Recent History,” First SIAM Int’l Conf. on Data Mining, 2001.

More Related