350 likes | 656 Views
SPP
E N D
1. State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report (APR)
3. State Performance Plan A six-year (2005-2011) State plan that…
establishes annual benchmarks and six-year targets for…
twenty required indicators
Covers the period - July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2011
4. SPP Process Process Requires:
Broad stakeholder input
Public dissemination
Annual public report on progress -statewide and for each local education agency
5. State Performance Plan Original SPP submitted on time to the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) in December 2005
Minor revisions were required by the USDE
SPP approved by OSEP in April 2006
OSEP included two tables of items needing attention in 2005-06 SPP
6. 2005-06 SPP (due February 1, 2007) submitted for SBE review at January meeting
Includes new baselines and targets for several Indicators
Includes OSEP required format changes
Includes OSEP require content changes
12. If the SPP was approved why did it change? To add baseline and target data as previously scheduled by OSEP
Indicator 4B, 7, 8, 9,10,11,14,18
To modify the SPP due to changed instructions required by OSEP
e.g., Statewide assessment table content and format
To aligning SPP data requirements to that of annual Section 618 data collection as required by OSEP
e.g., LRE and Preschool LRE
To modifying the SPP based on OSEP comments that accompanied its approval letter
Preschool Assessment and Parent Involvement to include sample information
Because it is a dynamic document that can be modified with the approval of OSEP
14. What’s Next for the SPP Submit a modified/revised SPP in February 2007
Prepare state and district-level public reports (Indicators 1-14)
Submit Annual Performance Report (APR) in February 2007
15. The original SPP may be accessed at:
http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/se/qa/documents/spp2005.pdf
The SBE approved version may be accessed at:
http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/ag/ag/yr07/documents/blue-jan07item26.doc
16. APR – Annual Performance Report
17. Annual Performance Report An annual State report that…
serves as a progress report on the SPP to demonstrate if:
annual benchmarks have been met
improvement activities were completed
for the twenty required indicators
28. Implications for CDE/SED Posted on the web
Will replace KPIs
Will be used to guide planning with stakeholders
Will be used by OSEP to monitor states
Compliance indicators will be used by OSEP to make Compliance Determinations per IDEA ‘04
29. Implications for LEAs Values posted on the web
Used to select districts for monitoring
Used to identify areas to be addressed in monitoring reviews and improvement planning
Disproportionality
Suspension and Expulsion
Will be used to identify districts who are significantly disproportionate
Used to establish Compliance Determinations per IDEA 04
30. Annual Performance Report The APR is due to the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) no later than February 1, 2007
Reporting period covers
July 1, 2005 – June 30, 2006
Has been reviewed and approved by the SBE
31. Okay – so what does all this mean to you?
32. What we hope to accomplish through this meeting Stakeholders will be acquainted with the general structure and purposes of the SPP and APR
Stakeholders will participate in a review of the indicators with particular emphasis on improvement activities
Stakeholders will be prepared to go back to their organization and represent the SPP and APR
Stakeholders will be prepared to review new data in Spring 07 and provide comment and updates to data analysis and improvement activities for newly calculated Indicator values
34. Tomorrow Evaluate improvement activities
What is working?
Where are the gaps? Holes?
What needs to be done to stimulate/support improvement
Policies, procedures, structures
Inservice training and professional development
Recruitment and retention of qualified staff
35. After Tomorrow Information will be summarized for use in Spring Stakeholders Meeting
Spring Stakeholder meeting will look at data about the indicators derived from December 2006 data collections
LRE
Preschool LRE
Disproportionality
Eligibility Evaluation
Secondary Transition