1 / 36

CITY RESILIENCE ACTION PLANNING (CityRAP) Tool

CITY RESILIENCE ACTION PLANNING (CityRAP) Tool. DiMSUR mandate: Provide technical assistance and knowledge on Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation and Urban Resilience in response to the needs of Member States. CityRAP: A flagship DiMSUR initiative.

aamy
Download Presentation

CITY RESILIENCE ACTION PLANNING (CityRAP) Tool

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CITY RESILIENCE ACTION PLANNING (CityRAP) Tool

  2. DiMSUR mandate: Provide technical assistance and knowledge on Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation and Urban Resilience in response to the needs of Member States. CityRAP: A flagship DiMSUR initiative DIMSUR Launch Event, Maputo, June 2013 • Initially concerning Mozambique, Madagascar, Comoros and Malawi • Non-Profit • Autonomous/non political • Regional/international status • Headquartered in Maputo with representation in each Member State • Open membership to other • sub-Saharan African countries

  3. KEY CHALLENGES FOR BUILDING RESILIENCEinsmallandmediumcities, orattheneighbourhoodlevelofbiggercities 1. Lackoftechnicalcapacityandexperiences 2. Lackofdata andinformation 3. Lackoffinancial resources Existing tools are often too complex, data hungry and not adapted to the reality of these cities

  4. THE CITY RESILIENCE ACTION PLANNING TOOL Four principles: 1 2 Targets small to intermediate cities or municipal districts within bigger cities The municipality is the leader of the process from day one 3 4 Leads to a Resilience Framework for Action Leverages local knowledge through clear concepts and a participatory approach

  5. The 5 Resilience Pillars of the CityRAP Tool

  6. CITYRAP Tool Process 200-300 people directly participate PARTICIPATORY DATA COLLECTION AND ORGANISATION Risk Mapping, Community Consultations Self assessment • Local government • Public institutions • Community representatives • CSOs and NGOs • Media • Private sector • Academia DATA ANALYSIS AND PRIORITISATION Focus Group Discussions Prioritisation Workshop 8-9 WEEKS PARTICIPATORY ELABORATION OF THE RESILIENCE FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION Technical Workshops

  7. Four Phases WEEK 1 WEEK 2 WEEK 3 WEEK 4 WEEK 5 WEEK 6 WEEK 7 WEEK 8 PHASE1 Crash Course PHASE 2 Data Collection and Organisation PHASE 3 Data Analysis & Prioritisation PHASE 4 Preparation, Review and Validation of the Resilience Framework of Action (RFA) Municipal Self Assess-ment 4-day workshop forbuilding the understandingof key concepts of risk and resilience and the tool methodology Participa-tory Planning at neigh-bourhood level Data compi- lation and Organi-sation Focus group discussions and Prioritisation of issues needing specific attention to build resilience Drafting and Reviewing the RFA by the municipality involving various stakeholders Finalising and Validating the RFA with city officials and different stake-holders Deliveredon-site byteamofexperts Municipal focal points lead the process Teamofexpertsprovideon site support Teamofexpertsprovideon site support

  8. PREPARATORY PHASE – Phase 0 Preliminary questionnaire to the city Designation of Municipal Focal Points by the Mayor Stakeholders mapping

  9. CRASH COURSE: Promoting the understanding Phase 1

  10. Use of a language easy to understand, although scientifically rigourous

  11. Phase 1 GROUP EXERCISES Games and collective discussions on issues and ideas related to urban resilience and disaster risk

  12. RISK MAPPING AT CITY LEVEL Identify the main risks that affect the city Choose neighborhoods for community risk mapping Phase 1

  13. TRAINING THE MUNICIPALFOCAL POINTS Provide Municipal Focal Points with knowledge and skills to lead the resilience planning process Phase 1

  14. DATA COLLECTION AND ORGANISATION: INSTITUTIONAL SELF ASSESSMENT • Assess the state of the city’s resilience through the knowledge, opinions and perceptions of municipal staff • Raise awareness on urban resilience Phase 2

  15. MUNICIPAL SELF- ASSESSMENT Phase 2 5 sections (one per resilience pillar)

  16. Phase 2 A MATRIX OF RESULTS EASY TO ANALYSE

  17. Phase 2 MAPPING USING SATELLITE IMAGES: THE KEY LINK TO ENSURE PARTICIPATION OF THE COMMUNITIES

  18. Phase 2 PRIORITY ISSUES AT COMMUNITY LEVEL

  19. FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS FOR EACH RESILIENCE PILLAR Thematic focus groups (representatives from municipality, community, NGOs, CSOs and other relevant stakeholders) for each pillar of resilience analyse the data collected during Phase 2 anddiscuss the main shortcomings and priorities. Phase 3

  20. PRIORITISATION WORKSHOP Phase 3 Key local stakeholders convene to discuss and decide upon priorities to build urban resilience based on the results of municipal self-assessment, community consultations and focus group discussions.

  21. The funnelling process to prioritise and plan Urban Gover-nance Urban Planning and Environ-ment Resilient Infra-structure and Basic Services UrbanEconomyandSociety Urban Disaster Risk Manage-ment Phase 3 PRIORITISATION ClimateChangeAdaptation & Mitigation SustainableUrbanGrowth Inclusive and safer cities Phase 4 CityResilienceFramework for Action (RFA)

  22. Filtering through the Resilience Diagramme

  23. From the IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS to the PLANNED ACTIONS Phase 4

  24. EVALUATION DE BASE

  25. ACTIONS PRIORITAIRES (5) Action prioritaire 1: Mis enoeuvre d’une stratégie au niveauduGrand Moroni (inter-communale) pourgérerleproblèmedesdéchetsetincluantunsystème de financementefficace

  26. Action prioritaire 2: Elaborer et mette en œuvre un Schéma d’Aménagement du Territoire (SAT) et Plans Locaux d’Urbanisme (PLU) en portant une attention particulière aux questions de l’accès à l’eau, à l’électricité , assainissement et système de drainage ainsi que des pôles économiques de développement

  27. Action prioritaire 3: Définir et mettre en œuvre un système de financement durable en matière d’aménagement urbain (eau, assainissement, drainage, route et énergie)

  28. Action prioritaire 4:Renforcer le cadre institutionnel pour la gestion de l’aire urbaine du « Grand Moroni »

  29. Action prioritaire 5:Promouvoir l’écotourisme et l’économie tertiaire en se focalisant sur l’intégration des jeunes actifs

  30. From PLANNED ACTIONS to the preparation for the actual IMPLEMENTATION Phase 4 • The identified priority actions are discussed in specialised focus groups and are broken down into activities with assigned responsibilities • Activities are categorised temporally into short-term (0-2 years), medium-term (3-5 years) and long-term (6-10 years) • A required budget is estimated for each activity • ONE responsible office/entity is assigned to EACH activity (NB: if an activity involves more offices/entities, then a LEAD ENTITY will be assigned for coordination purposes)

  31. MAPPING COMPONENT Phase 4

  32. Set up a MONITORING and EVALUATION Framework Phase 4 • A spider web per RFA Component is prepared, starting with the baseline assessment in terms of scoring for each priority issue • The evolution/performance of each RFA Component is monitored every two years and short evaluation report is produced • The RFA is updated based on the recommendations derived from the 2-years evaluation report

  33. Comment évaluer les progrès des problèmes prioritaires ? • 3 Plans Gestion des déchets solides • 2 Politiques et législation 1 Organisation institutionnelle Interventions Finance

  34. Commentévaluerlesprogrèsdescomposantes? • 3 Gestion des déchets solides Politiques et législation • 2 Eau, assainissement et drainage Economie/ création d’emploi 1 Energie Aménagement urbain/ espaces publics

  35. CITY RAP RESPONDING TO CHALLENGESinsmallandmediumcities, orattheneighbourhoodlevelofbiggercities 1. Lackoftechnicalcapacityandexperience 2. Lackofdata andinformation 3. Lackoffinancial resources Reinforcescapacity, transferskillsandtools to municipal techniciansthroughtrainings, on-the-job exercisesandgroupactivities Leverage local knowledgeandinformation to kickstart processes; identifykey gaps for future actionthroughthe RFA RFA can bepowerfultoolmobilisingandchannelingresources

More Related