170 likes | 369 Views
Community Transformation Project. Project Overview Presented 20 January 2006 Ed Rosenstein, CTP Project Manager. CTP Project Overview. Project Organization Project Charter Introduction. CTP Organizational Alignment. Executive Sponsor. Managing Sponsor. Project Manager.
E N D
Community Transformation Project Project Overview Presented 20 January 2006 Ed Rosenstein, CTP Project Manager
CTP Project Overview Project Organization Project Charter Introduction
CTP Organizational Alignment Executive Sponsor Managing Sponsor Project Manager Community Transformation Project Action Team CTPAT
CTP Organizational Alignment • All volunteers to the CTP are part of the CTPAT • The CTP Steering Team collectively determines scope, deliverables and priorities for the project • The CTP Steering Team is comprised of: • CTP Executive Sponsor • CTP Managing Sponsor • CTP Project Manager • 6 CTPAT members
CTP Work Team CTP Work Team CTP Work Team CTP Work Team CTP Operational Alignment CTP Steering Team Project Manager
CTP Steering Team Greg Balestrero – Executive Sponsor Brantlee Jacobs – Managing Sponsor Ed Rosenstein – Project Manager Derek Belyea – CTPAT Member Jan van Broeck – CTPAT Member Linda Keating – CTPAT Member Marcio Prieto – CTPAT Member Zbigniew Traczyk – CTPAT Member Patty Wong – CTPAT Member
CTPAT Members Derek Belyea (Canada) Patty Wong (Hong Kong) Emilio Oteiza (Uruguay) Dan Tuten (USA) Nick Lake (UK) Steffi Triest (Germany) Jane Farley (New Zealand) Linda Keating (South Africa) Marcio Prieto (Brazil) Peter Monkhouse (Canada) Zbigniew Traczyk (Poland) Mahendra Rathore (Singapore) Litsa Karanthanassis (Jordan) Deena Parla Gordon (Turkey) Marilyn McCauley (USA) Jan Van Broeck (Belgium) Young Min Park (South Korea) Margareth Carniero (Brazil)
CTP Feedback Loop CSMAG LIAG Mary Kate Webber Judy Brennan CTP Project Manager Pat Richardson Component Leaders Component Mentors
CTP Project Charter - Introduction Community Transformation Project • Approved by PMI BOD – September, 2005 • Based on the following principles: • Normalize value at all levels of community • Provide flexible models for community formation to encourage interaction and growth • Develop communities only when the business case and the projected outcome clearly demonstrate the value to the member
CTP Project Charter - Introduction • In the future, we plan to implement change to community formation in the following ways: • Provide more variety in structures for both geographic and non-geographic communities • Revise criteria and/or business cases for community formation • Create a community development model to accelerate maturity • Evaluate Associate member category as an entry point for new communities
CTP Current State vs Future State Current: The quality of the member experience and the value delivered is inconsistent between components Future: Members will gain a better understanding and improved certainty about the scope and quality of services available from each type of community
CTP Current State vs Future State Current: There are significant burdens on member volunteers to create and maintain components Future: New community formats permit greater flexibility in the creation of new communities and the delivery of value to members These new formats will support the creative drive of volunteers while also reducing the current administrative burdens
CTP Current State vs Future State Current: There is minimal collaboration between PMI’s components in the delivery of products and services Future: New governance models will ensure an increase in the overall level of component collaboration in the delivery of programs, products and services to members and others
CTP Critical Success Factors • Backlog of potential chartered components notified of criteria, process and procedures to follow no later than January, 2007 • Component leaders, the backbone of the current component structure, accept and support new governance models • Ongoing approval and support of the PMI Board • Community retention and net member satisfaction index increases with the new system
CTP Project Goals By the end of 2006: • Develop additional community models based on the Community Continuum derived during the 2005 project • Validate the additional community models through proof-of-concept testing with current potential component applicants and other identifiable PMI communities • Develop implementation plans for the rollout of these models to form new communities, including appropriate training and mentoring • Draft a roadmap for subsequent work in a follow-on phase