1 / 18

Reducing Carry-Over of Coccidiostats in Feed and Food

Reducing Carry-Over of Coccidiostats in Feed and Food. Dr. Peter Kubasa Feed Safety Conference, Prague, March 3, 2009. Overview. The Role of Coccidiostats Carry-Over Tolerances in non-target feed and food. List of Authorised Coccidiostats for Broilers. As of 20 /10/2004.

adamdaniel
Download Presentation

Reducing Carry-Over of Coccidiostats in Feed and Food

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reducing Carry-Over of Coccidiostatsin Feed and Food Dr. Peter Kubasa Feed Safety Conference, Prague, March 3, 2009

  2. Overview • The Role of Coccidiostats • Carry-Over • Tolerances in non-target feed and food

  3. List of Authorised Coccidiostats for Broilers As of 20/10/2004 Community Register of Feed Additives pursusant to Regulation No. 1831/2003

  4. Estimated EU 27 feed production – use of coccidiostats by segment

  5. Cross-Contamination / Carry-Over • Transfer from one production batch to the following batch due to manufacture of broad range of compound feeding stuffs. • Unavoidable traces of coccidiostats remain in production line  end up in following product batch  can result in residues in feedingstuffs for non target species • Legal provisions for minimising the risk of carry-over (Feed hygiene regulation 183/2005, HACCP)

  6. At the Feed Mill • Level of cross-contamination depends on: • Quality control process (e.g.:new NIR online technology) • Design of the dosage • Grinding and mixing equipment • Transport and storage facilities • …technical or organisational measures must be taken to avoid or minimize, as necessary, any cross-contamination and errors….. As of 3/10/2004

  7. Contamination of Feed with a Coccidiostat Investigations in a feed mill: A,B,C: sampling points Ref.: McEvoy et al., 2003,Feed Additives and Contaminants, Vol 20

  8. Contamination of Feed with a Coccidiostat ppm • Investigation of 3 feed batches (3x3t) following coccidiostat-batch • Sampling before pelleting ( post mixer,  post elevator boot) • Steady decline of residues (mg/kg) in feed batches • Only residues in first batch/3t would cause violative residues in eggs • 3t flush enough to minimize carry over!? • Sampling post press/pelleter () • Residues in excess of limits causing violative residues in tissues • Cause of prolonged contamination was the mill‘s practice of recycling sieved material back into pre-press bins • Corrective actions… Ref.: McEvoy et al., 2003,Feed Additives and Contaminants, Vol 20

  9. Corrective Actions • Step 1 – Extension of clean-out time to ensure that all medicated material was re-pelleted before the next batch of drug-free feed entered the pre-press bins • Step 2 – Pellet-overs were redirected back to cooler, reducing the chances for contamination from the pre-press bin • Introduction of new production line for poultry rations • New elevators with reduced dead-space at the boot (1kg) • Two separate mixers for breeder rations and St/G/F/WD • Three separate presses for breeder, St/G and F rations • 57 rations tested: 93% without any contamination; 7% all with concentrations below the levels causing violative residues in poultry tissues and eggs.

  10. Multiple Potential Causes for Residues in Tissues and Eggs • Contamination of feed at the feed mill or during transport • Supply of incorrect feed bin • Inadequate cleaning of feeding system on farm prior to feed delivery and feed change over • Inadequate withdrawal periods being obseved • Poor management of feed on farm leading to re-exposure of birds to drugs close to slaughter • Recycling of drug by birds from litter

  11. Tolerances for Residues in Feed • Undesirable substances in animal feed Directive 2002/32/EC • ALARA principle – ‘as low as reasonably achieveable’ • Initially a carry-over range of 3 – 10% has been considered achievable • Risk assessment of unavoidable carry-over of coccidiostats for animal health and public health  scientific assessment by EFSA/FEEDAP • Tolerance levels in feed can lead to residues in products of animal origin maximum limits for food of non-target species have been established in parallel

  12. Evaluation of Tolerances in Non Target Species inFeed hypothetical carry-over to non target feed 2% 5% 10% 11 coccidiostats maximum dose in feed • Risk for animals • Residues in food • Risk for consumer • Scientific opinions done by EFSA • Decision byStanding Committe done on tolerances in feed and food in Nov 08 • Application of Directive 2009/8/EC (feed) • and Regulation No.124/2009(food) by • July 09

  13. Tolerances in Non-Target Feeds Tolerance levels differentiated into two groups Feed for less-sensitive non-target species Feed for sensitive non- target species, WD feed 3% compared to authorised max. concentration of coccidiostat in feed 1% compared to authorised max. concentration of coccidiostat in feed

  14. NICARBAZIN 1. Target feed - Chickens for fattening (50 mg/kg) (in combination with narasin) 2. Non-target feed a) sensitive species + withdrawal feed (finishing feed) + continuously food producing animals for which transfer of feed into food is likely - sensitive species : none - withdrawal feed (finishing feed): chickens for fattening: 5 days; - continuously food producing animals: laying birds b) less sensitive species - all other non target species 3. Tolerances non-target feed 4. Established MRLs None 5. Maximum Limits in food of animal origin – non-target species (in function of the tolerances under point 3) - eggs: 100 µg/kg - liver and kidney from non-target species: 100 µg/kg - milk: 5 µg/kg - all other food of animal origin of non target species: 25 µg/kg

  15. Tolerance Limits in Food & Feed *) Layers =Non-target species

  16. Residues in Eggsat 5% carry-over Ref.: Daeseleire et al.,SPSD II 2000-2006, Case study: coccidiostats

  17. Open Questions to Tolerance Levels • 1% tolerance is too ambitious for many mixing plants • Considerable investment needed for upgrades • Regional supply of feed may be compromised • How to detect substances at 1% inclusion • e.g. diclazuril LOD is higher than 0,01 mg/kg feed • Maximum Limits in food of non-target species • MLs in „food“ are not considered MRLs in animal tissues according to Reg. 2377/1990 and residue complaints may still be raised by residue inspection.

  18. Summary • Coccidiostats will continue to play a significant role as zootechnical additives in poultry feeds beyond 2012 • Unavoidable carry-over into non-target feeds will continue despite GMP, but tolerance limits are set now for feed and food • It is a great achievement to get away from the 0-tolerance approach in feeding stuffs but 1% tolerance is challenging for a number of feed compounders

More Related