1 / 18

Signal Response to Pions in Testbeam Measurements and Geant Simulation

Signal Response to Pions in Testbeam Measurements and Geant Simulation. Carla M. Vale Collaboration Meeting April 16, 1999. 4 planes of Spectrometer type 1 modules. Trigger Scint. Cerenkov. Phobos paddle. TestBeam ‘98. The high momentum beam line setup:

admon
Download Presentation

Signal Response to Pions in Testbeam Measurements and Geant Simulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Signal Response to Pions in Testbeam Measurements and Geant Simulation Carla M. Vale Collaboration Meeting April 16, 1999

  2. 4 planes of Spectrometer type 1 modules Trigger Scint. Cerenkov Phobos paddle TestBeam ‘98 • The high momentum beam line setup: • p- beam from 0.5 to 8GeV/c Recorded 40000-50000 tracks at each energy point (~200k hits) Energy points: 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 GeV/c • The beam and trigger: • p- beam • veto e- with Cerenkov • muon contents <2% • no protons • Dp/p = 0.5% • cross checked absolute energy with calorimeter - better than 4%

  3. Signal Processing and Calculation • The Initialization:Getstart values for pedestal and noise • TPhFECDetector::PedPreProcess • TPhFECDetector::PedProcess • TPhFECDetector::NoiseProcess • The Event Loop:Correct common mode noise shifts and zero-suppress empty channels • TPhFECDetector::CMNProcess • TPhFECDetector::ZeroSuppress

  4. Signal Processing and Calculation • Signal Processing:Get the detector geometry, our sensor layout and the FEC assignment to sensors: all processing is based on physical sensors • TPhDetector::MakeHitArrays • TPhDetector::Calibrate • TPhDetector::MakeHitsOutOfHitArray • Ready to merge hits, • start the TrackSeedFinder and • reconstruct the tracks with Inkyu’s code

  5. Reconstructed Track Event #37450

  6. Run12: 1GeV pions, reconstructed

  7. Signal: 1 GeV, Planes 1 and 2

  8. Signal: 1 GeV, Planes 3 and 4

  9. Signal Distribution, All Sensors • Each sensor is normalized to 300mm thickness • Planes 3 and 4 corrected foroverdepletion of modules

  10. Geant Simulation • 16000 p tracks per energy point • Control Parameters: • MULS=1: Multiple scattering according to Molière theory • DCAY=1: Decay in flight with generation of secondaries • HADR=1: Hadronic interactions with generation of secondaries • LOSS=1: Continuous energy loss with generation of δ -rays above DCUTE and restricted Landau fluctuations below DCUTE (=1MeV) • PAIR=1: Pair production • BREM=1: Bremsstrahlung with generation of γ • COMP=1: Compton scattering • PHOT=1: Photo-electric effect with generation of the electron • DRAY=1: δ -rays production • ANNI=1: Positron annihilation with generation of photons

  11. Data + Geant - I Geant  Data

  12. Data + Geant - II

  13. Momentum Dependence: Data + Geant Data Geant

  14. Energy Loss • Energy loss by charged particles in matter is primarily due to ionization. • The momentum dependence of the mean energy loss for moderately relativistic particles is described by Bethe-Bloch formula • MIP: minimum ionizing particles, with momentum corresponding to the Bethe-Bloch function minimum. • In thin detectors, not all the energy lost is deposited, remaining is carried away by energetic knock-on electrons (d-rays) • Energy loss Restricted Energy loss

  15. Data + Bethe-Bloch - I Bethe-Bloch without escaping d-rays Bethe-Bloch with escaping d-rays, ktresh=0.1,0.2,0.3

  16. Data + Bethe-Bloch - II

  17. Conclusions - I • Primary aim: to measure our detectors’ signal response and compare it to simulation with the final Phobos detector • Additional major benefit: preparation of the full raw signal processing for Phat data analysis (mainly by Cracow group)

  18. Conclusions - The Results • We achieved extremely high precision • Mapped the dE/dx log rise: MIP~800-1000MeV, DErel/DEMIP = 4% • Geant is able to accurately describe the dE/dx gain and straggling when the electronics noise and Gaussian modifications (“Shulek”) are taken into account. • Bethe-Bloch gives a reasonable approximation when restricted energy loss is considered (~10%) • MIP point is higher than predicted by pure Bethe-Bloch • Log rise is overestimated by pure Bethe-Bloch

More Related