1 / 13

Joaquin Miller Elementary School

Joaquin Miller Elementary School. Extended Day Care Program (EDCP) Committee February 27, 2014. Agenda. Introduction of Committee Members Committee Goals Survey Overview Survey Results Plans Short Term Long Term Questions / Community Feedback. The Committee.

aiden
Download Presentation

Joaquin Miller Elementary School

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joaquin Miller Elementary School Extended Day Care Program (EDCP) Committee February 27, 2014

  2. Agenda • Introduction of Committee Members • Committee Goals • Survey Overview • Survey Results • Plans • Short Term • Long Term • Questions / Community Feedback

  3. The Committee • Parents from K-4th Grade • Ashlee Best, Andi White, LilitAsadourian, Tania Adams, Mia Georgiu, Wendy Spander, MeridithForristal, Jonathan Weldon, Karin Gregg, Chris Seeger, ShareenCambra, Adrienne seal, Season Korchin, Jon Korchin, Michele Guyton, Manny Cho (Co-Chair) • 3 Teachers • Sue Scott, Kathleen Moran, Laura Savage (Co-Chair)

  4. Committee Goal • Fix the short term issues as defined by the Community and Principal Smith and create a long term proposal for an afterschool program that meets the majority of the needs of the JM Community. • Short term: Sometime between now and the beginning of the 2014-2015 term • Long term: 2014-15 term and beyond

  5. Survey Responses • 117 surveys (about 35% of the JM Families) • 155 children (36.5% of the children) • Class Results • 27 Kindergarten • 29 1st Grade • 37 2nd Grade • 15 3rd Grade • 31 4th Grade • 15 5th Grade

  6. Survey Responses 89 Families Participate in AT 116 Families Participate in Enrichment 12 Families Participate in Tutoring 60 Families Have Other Activities (Music, Sports, None, etc)

  7. Survey Responses • Positives • Affordable – 28 • Staff – 10 (3 specifically for Natalie) • Free Play – 7 • Safety – 4 • Options – 4 • Reliability – 3 • Flexibility – 2 • Continuity of Staff – 2 • Fills Basic Needs – 1 • Smooth Running - 1 • Concerns • Full / Lack of Space – 23 • Flexibility / Drop In – 16 • Lack of Programs / Structure – 7 • Cost - 7 • Selection – 5 • Staff Inexperience – 4 • Environment – 3 • Safety / Supervision / Kindergarten “gap” – 2 • Business Practices - 1

  8. JM Survey ResultsRankings of 5 Factors

  9. Ranking of 5 Program Attributes

  10. Short Term Projects • Provide AT / Enrichment Teams with Feedback / Individual Program Concerns • How to Expand Space to Allow More Families to Participate in AT (Afterschool) • Work with Principal Smith, AT, Enrichment Team and – if required – District Team • (Sub-committee) AT Space Expansion • (Sub-committee) AT / Enrichment Program Coordinator to help with scheduling • (Sub-committee) Review other Hill School Programs

  11. Short Term Projects • Full Time Coordinator for the Enrichment Program • Currently Parent Volunteer • Develop Job description • Who does this individual / company “report” to? • Term of Position – how to review

  12. Long Term Projects • Full Time Coordinator for the Enrichment Program • Currently Parent Volunteer • Job description • Who does this individual / company “report” to? • Term of Position – how to review • Evaluate Other Programs to Build Best Overall Sustainable Program for JM • Develop Evaluation Criteria • Gather information from Hill and Non-Hill Schools • Other Programs

  13. Questions?

More Related