Integrated Baseline Review

1. ver. 5.1. December 2004 Integrated Defense Acquisition, Technology, & Logistics Life Cycle Management Framework Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution DEPSECDEF Oversight DoD 7000.14-R This chart is a classroom aid for Defense Acquisition University students. It provides a notional illustration of the interfaces among the three major decision support systems used to develop, produce, and field a system for national defense. Defense acquisition is a complex process, with many more activities than shown here, and many concurrent processes that cannot be properly displayed on a two-dimensional chart. Supporting information is on the back of this chart. For more information see the Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Knowledge Sharing System (http://akss.dau.mil). The Milestone Decision Authority may authorize entry into the acquisition process at any point, consistent with phase specific entrance criteria and statutory requirements DOD Decision Support Systems Effective Interaction is Essential Concept Refinement Phase Technology Development Phase System Development & Demonstration Phase Production & Deployment Phase Operations & Support Phase Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System VCJCS Oversight CJCSI 3170.01D Defense Acquisition System USD(AT&L) Oversight DoDD 5000.1 Develop a system or increment of capability; reduce integration and manufacturing risk; ensure operational supportability; reduce logistics footprint; implement human systems integration; design for producibility; ensure affordability and protection of critical program information; and demonstrate system integration, interoperability, safety, and utility. Execute a support program that meets operational support performance requirements and sustains the system in the most cost-effective manner over its total life cycle. Dispose of the system in the most cost-effective manner at the end of its useful life. Refine initial concept. Develop Technology Development Strategy Achieve operational capability that satisfies mission needs. Reduce technology risk and determine appropriate set of technologies to integrate into a full system. MS C MS A MS B System Integration System Demonstration Low-Rate Initial Production Disposal Full-Rate Production/Deployment Sustainment CD FRP DR DRR Decision Points/Milestones Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System - Acronyms KPPs KPPs DoD Strategic Guidance CDD – Capability Development Document CJCSI – Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction CPD – Capability Production Document DOTMLPF – Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, and Facilities DAB – Defense Acquisition Board ICD – Initial Capabilities Document IOC – Initial Operational Capability JROC – Joint Requirements Oversight Council KPP – Key Performance Parameter Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System (need driven) System Threat Assessment System Threat Assessment FOC IOC FOC Net-Ready KPP Net-Ready KPP Joint Operations Concepts Draft CDD Service/JROC Validation & Approval Service/JROC Validation & Approval Functional Area Analysis Joint Operating Concepts Joint Functional Concepts Joint Integrating Concepts Integrated Architectures J-6 Interoperability & Supportability Cert. J-6 Interoperability & Supportability Cert. Validated and approved CDD and CPD for each increment of an evolutionary acquisition Threshold/objective tradeoffs – Revised Performance Attributes Threshold/objective tradeoffs – Revised Performance Attributes Joint Functional Concept Joint Integrating Concept Integrated Architecture Joint Functional Concept Joint Integrating Concept Integrated Architecture Joint Functional Concept Joint Integrating Concept Integrated Architecture ICD CPD CDD Functional Needs Analysis Information Support Plan Information Support Plan Service/JROC Validation & Approval Materiel Changes (CJCSI 3170) Ideas for Materiel Approaches Analysis of Materiel Approaches D O T M L P F B C DOTMLPF Changes (CJCSI 3180) Alternative 1 Evolutionary Acquisition Strategy Initiate Evolutionary Acquisition Strategy Increment II Alternative 2 DRR FRP Alternative N Functional Solution Analysis Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS) Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS) Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS) Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS) Post Independent Analysis B C Increment III DRR FRP Exit Criteria Met Exit Criteria Met Exit Criteria Met Exit Criteria Met DAB/ ITAB DAB/ ITAB DAB/ ITAB DAB/ ITAB DAB/ ITAB Exit Criteria Met ADM ADM ADM ADM DAB/ ITAB APB MDA APB MDA APB MDA MDA MDA ADM MDA ADM Exit Criteria Exit Criteria Exit Criteria Exit Criteria Exit Criteria Oversight & Review Acquisition Strategy Acquisition Strategy Acquisition Strategy Technology Development Strategy • Program Structure • Acquisition Approach • Capability Needs • T&E Considerations • Risk Management • Resource Management • Systems Engineering • Interoperability • Information Technology • Research & Tech Protection • Information Assurance • Product Support • Human Systems Integration • ESOH • MOSA • Business Considerations • Best Practices • Relief, Exemptions & Waivers • Program Structure • Acquisition Approach • Capability Needs • T&E Considerations • Risk Management • Resource Management • Systems Engineering • Interoperability • Information Technology • Research & Tech Protection • Information Assurance • Product Support • Human Systems Integration • ESOH • MOSA • Business Considerations • Best Practices • Relief, Exemptions & Waivers • Program Structure • Acquisition Approach • Capability Needs • T&E Considerations • Risk Management • Resource Management • Systems Engineering • Interoperability • Information Technology • Research & Tech Protection • Information Assurance • Product Support • Human Systems Integration • ESOH • MOSA • Business Considerations • Best Practices • Relief, Exemptions & Waivers Oversight & Review Acronyms • Program Strategy • Cost, schedule & performance goals & exit criteria for first tech demonstration • Test Plan Total Life Cycle Systems Management ADM – Acquisition Decision Memorandum AoA – Analysis of Alternatives APB – Acquisition Program Baseline CD – Concept Decision DAB – Defense Acquisition Board DRR – Design Readiness Review ESOH – Environment, Safety & Occupational Health FOC – Full Operational Capability FRPDR – Full-Rate Production Decision Review IOC – Initial Operational Capability ITAB – Information Technology Acquisition Board LRIP – Low Rate Initial Production MAIS – Major Automated Information System MDA – Milestone Decision Authority MOSA – Modular Open Systems Approach TLCSM – Total Life Cycle Systems Management TLCSM TLCSM TLCSM TLCSM AoA Plan • Purpose of LRIP: • Establish Production Base • Ramp to Production Rate • Produce systems for IOT&E AoA AoA AoA AoA updated updated n/a MAIS MAIS only Draft RFP Draft RFP Draft RFP Draft RFP Technology Development Contract Study Contracts Source Selection Plan Contracting System Development & Demonstration Contract Source Selection Plan Source Selection Plan Source Selection Plan Acq Plan LRIP Contract Production Contract Acq Plan Acq Plan Acq Plan Post Production Software Support Contracts RFP RFP RFP RFP Sustainment Contracts RFP – Request for Proposal Integrated Baseline Review Integrated Baseline Review Integrated Baseline Review Integrated Baseline Review Major Products Preferred System Concept Low-Rate Initial Production Systems Full-Rate Production Systems Prototypes/ Engineering Dev Models Prototypes/ Engineering Dev Models Preliminary Integrated Architecture Best Materiel Approach(es) Tech Demos System Performance Spec Initial Production Baseline Final Production Baseline Post-Deployment Review • Product Support Package/PBL Implementation • Product Support Elements • Support and Cost Baseline • Operations & Sustainment • Peacetime • Training • Product Support Plan • Statutory/Regulatory • Source of Support • Legacy Considerations •Supply Chain Management •Contract for Sustainment (organic & commercial) • Demonstrate Product Support Capability • Footprint Reduction • Supply Chain Management • Product Support Elements • Product Support/PBL Management • Public-Private Partnering • PBA Modifications • Assessment of PSI/PSPs • Supply Chain Management Refine Supportability Objectives/ Constraints Define Supportability Objectives • Product Support Elements Set Product Support Strategy Develop Initial Product Support Strategy Logistics/ Sustainment Evaluate Product Support Capabilities • Continuous Tech Refreshment • Obsolescence Management • Configuration Control • Data Management • Joint Operations • Crises -Supply Support -Training -Maintenance -Support Data -Manpower & personnel FRP DR A B C CD DRR Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Strategy (Preferred Product Support Approach) INPUTS OUTPUTS INPUTS OUTPUTS INPUTS OUTPUTS OTRR Pre-IOC & Post IOC Supportability Assessments Independent IOT&E Defense Acquisition System (event driven) • ICD • AoA Plan • Exit Criteria • Alternative Maintenance & Logistics Concepts • Prelim Sys Spec • T&E Strategy • SEP • Support & Maintenance • Concepts & Technologies • Inputs to: • -draft CDD • -AoA • -TDS • -Cost/Manpower Est. • ICD & Draft CDD • Preferred Sys Concept • Exit Criteria • T&E Strategy • Support & Maintenance • Concepts & Technologies • AoA • SEP • TDS • Sys Performance Spec • LFT&E Waiver Request • TEMP • Validated Sys Support & • Maintenance Objectives & • Requirements • SEP •PESHE •PPP •TRA • Inputs to: • -IBR -ISP -STA -CDD • -Acq Strategy • -Affordability Assessment • -Cost/Manpower Est. • Sys Performance Spec • Exit Criteria • Validated Sys Support & • Maintenance Objectives & • Requirements • APB • CDD • SEP • ISP • TEMP • Initial Prod Baseline • Test Reports • TEMP • Elements of Product • Support • Risk Assessment • SEP •TRA • PESHE • Inputs to: • -CPD -STA -ISP • -Cost/Manpower Est. Performance Based Agreements Business Case Analysis Product Support Integrator/ Product Support Provider Full-Up System Level LFT&E Logistics & Technical Acronyms Disposal BLRIP Report to Congress FOT&E ASR – Alternative Systems Review BLRIP – Beyond Low Rate Initial Production CDR – Critical Design Review CI – Configuration Item DT&E – Developmental Test & Evaluation EOA – Early Operational Assessment ESOH – Environmental, Safety & Occupational Health FCA – Functional Configuration Audit FMECA – Failure Mode Effects & Criticality Analysis FOT&E – Follow-on Test & Evaluation FTA – Failure Tree Analysis IOT&E – Initial Operational Test & Evaluation ISR – In-Service Review ITR – Initial Technical Review JITC – Joint Interoperability Test Command LFT&E – Live Fire Test & Evaluation LORA – Level of Repair Analysis LRIP – Low Rate Initial Production MTA – Maintenance Task Analysis OA – Operational Assessment OT&E – Operational Test & Evaluation OTRR – Operational Test Readiness Review PESHE – Programmatic Environment, Safety & Occupational Health Evaluation PDR – Preliminary Design Review PCA – Physical Configuration Audit PRR – Production Readiness Review PPP – Program Protection Plan RCM – Reliability Centered Maintenance RMS – Reliability, Maintainability & Supportability SEP – Systems Engineering Plan SFR – System Functional Review SRR – System Requirements Review STA – System Threat Assessment SVR – System Verification Review T&E – Test & Evaluation TEMP – Test & Evaluation Master Plan TDS – Technology Development Strategy TRA – Technology Readiness Assessment TRR – Test Readiness Review Most Acceptable JITC Interoperability Certification Testing Recycle/Reuse J-6 Interoperability & Supportability Validation LFTE Report to Congress Reprocessing FCA Landfill ITR SRR PRR Disposal SVR ASR INPUTS OUTPUTS INPUTS OUTPUTS Least Acceptable Interpret User Needs, Refine System Performance Specs & Environmental Constraints Combined DT&E/OT&E/LFT&E Demonstrate System to Specified User Needs & Environmental Constraints Interpret User Needs, Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints Analyze/Assess Concepts Versus Defined User Needs & Environmental Constraints Demo & Validate Sys Concepts & Technology Maturity Versus Defined User Needs • Data for In-Service Review • Input to CDD for next increment • Modifications/upgrades to fielded • systems • SEP Interpret User Needs. Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints • Production Baseline • Test Reports • TEMP • PESHE• SEP • Input to: • - Cost/Manpower Est. • Service Use Data • User Feedback • Failure Reports • Discrepancy Reports • SEP • Test Results • Exit Criteria • APB • CPD • SEP •TEMP • Product Support Package Technical Systems Engineering Test & Evaluation Supportability Trades Trades Trades Trades Trades Trades SRR PCA In-Service Review System DT&E, LFT&E & OAs, Verify System Functionality & Constraints Compliance to Specs Demo/Model Integrated System Versus Performance Spec Develop System Functional Specs & System Verification Plan Develop System Perf (& Constraints) Spec & Enabling/Critical Tech Verification Plan Develop Concept Performance (& Constraints) Definition & Verification Objectives Assess/Analyze Concept & Verify System Concept’s Performance Monitor and Collect All Service Use Data Implement and Field Analyze Deficiencies To Determine Corrective Actions Verify & Validate Production Configuration TRR SFR Trades Evolve Functional Performance Specs into CI Functional (Design to) Specs and CI Verification Plan Trades Integrated DT&E, LFT&E & EOAs Verify Performance Compliance to Specs FMECA Decompose Concept Performance into Functional Definition & Verification Objectives Assess/Analyze System Concept Versus Functional Capabilities Demo System Functionality Versus Plan Develop Functional Definitions for Enabling/ Critical Technologies & Associated Verification Plan Assess Risk of Improved System Analyze Data to Determine Root Cause FTA Modify Configuration (Hardware/Software/Specs) To Correct Deficiencies RCM PDR Individual CI Verification DT&E Evolve CI Functional Specs into Product (Build to) Documentation and Inspection Plan Decompose Concept Functional Definition into Component Concepts & Assessment Objectives Assess/Analyze Enabling/Critical Components Versus Capabilities Decompose Functional Definitions into Critical Component Definition & Tech Verification Plan Demo Enabling/ Critical Technology Components Versus Plan Determine System Risk/ Hazard Severity Integrate & Test Corrective Action LORA LFT&E Waiver (if appropriate) CDR MTA Fabricate, Assemble, Code to “Build-to” Documentation Develop Component Concepts, i.e., Enabling/Critical Technologies, Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers Develop System Concepts, i.e., Enabling/Critical Technologies, Update Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers Develop Corrective Action • Process Change – Hardware/Support • Materiel Change Full Funding in FYDP Cost Acronyms Economic Analysis (MAIS Only) Economic Analysis (MAIS Only) Economic Analysis (MAIS Only) CARD – Cost Analysis Requirements Description CCA – Component Cost Assessment ICE – Independent Cost Estimate MAIS – Major Automated Information System POE – Program Office Estimate RDT&E – Research, Development, Test & Evaluation CARD(Designated Programs) CARD(Designated Programs) CARD(Designated Programs) Affordability Assessment Affordability Assessment Affordability Assessment CCA CCA CCA POE ICE POE ICE POE ICE Cost PMO Budget Estimate Actual Costs Cost Estimation Methods Parametric Engineering Analogy PMO POM Input RDT&E – Advanced Technology Development RDT&E – Systems Development & Demonstration RDT&E – Adv Component Dev & Prototypes Types of Funds Operations & Maintenance Procurement RDT&E – Management & Support RDT&E – Management & Support RDT&E – Management & Support Military Departments & Defense Agencies Appropriated Funds To Support Contracts Planning, Programming, Budgeting, & Execution Process August Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution Acronyms DoD Testimony DoD Appeals Allocation POM/Budget Submit PCP/BCP Submit POM/Budget Formulation PCP/BCP Prep BCP – Budget Change Proposals FYDP – Future Years Defense Program MBI – Major Budget Issues OMB – Office of Management & Budget PBD – Program Budget Decision PCP – Program Change Proposals PDM – Program Decision Memorandum POM – Program Objectives Memorandum SLRG – Senior Leadership Review Group September - November PDM(s) SLRG Reviews ISSUES OSD & Joint Staff Strategic Planning Guidance Off Year Optional Joint Programming Guidance Off Year Optional Joint Planning Document Apportionment DoD Budget Final PBDs PBD Cycle MBI FYDP updated October April / May FYDP updated National Military Strategy Congress Congress October - November December November (biennial calendar driven) White House OMB Authorization/ Appropriation Acts Passed President’s Budget to Congress Budget Committees Authorization Committees Appropriation Committees National Security Strategy Fiscal Guidance On Year January Off Year February (1st Monday) February - September Recommendations to improve this chart are encouraged and may be sent to wallchart@dau.mil. 6.2.2.1 6.2.4.1 6.2.5.1 6.2.5.3 6.2.4.2 6.2.3.1 6.2.1.1 6.2.4.4 6.2.2.2 6.2.4.3 6.2.5.4 6.2.6.1 6.2.1.2 6.2.5.5 6.2 SS Procedures 6.2.1. SS During the JCIDS Process 6.2.1.1. SS Actions in Support of the Analysis of Material Approaches (AMA). 6.2.1.2. SS Actions in Support of the Initial Capabilities Document (ICD). 6.2.2. SS at the Concept Decision 6.2.2.1. Develop Spectrum Data Requirements 6.2.2.2. Spectrum Certification Submittal of DD Form 1494 Stage 1. 6.2.3. SS During the Concept Refinement Phase 6.2.3.1. SS Actions in Support of the AoA 6.2.4. Spectrum Supportability During the Technology Development Phase 6.2.4.1. SS in Support of the Capabilities Development Document (CDD). 6.2.4.2. SS in Support of the Information Support Plan (ISP). 6.2.4.3. Spectrum Certification Submittal of DD Form 1494 Stage 2. 6.2.4.4. SS in Support of Contracting 6.2.5. Spectrum Supportability During the System Development and Demonstration Phase. 6.2.5.1. SS in Support of the Capabilities Development Document (CPD). 6.2.5.2. SS in Support of the System Requirements Review (SRR) 6.2.5.3. SS in Support of the ISP. 6.2.5.4. Spectrum Certification Submittal of DD Form 1494 Stage 3. 6.2.5.5. SS in Support of the Production Readiness Review (PRR). 6.2.6. Spectrum Supportability During the Production and Deployment Phase. 6.2.6.1. Spectrum Certification Submittal of DD Form 1494 Stage 4. 6.2.6.2. Submit Frequency Clearance Request(s). 6.2.5.2 6.2.6.2