Using P20 Data to Improve Student Achievement:

1. Using P20 Data to Improve Student Achievement: A Conversation with the Illinois Board of Higher Education On the Web: DataQualityCampaign.org On Twitter: @EdDataCampaign April 10, 2012

2. Changing the Culture Around Data Use Past Future

3. In search of alternatives to dartboards! • In the education sector, leaders… • Make decisions by hunch or anecdote • Throw darts hoping to hit the bullseye • In all other sectors, leaders… • Make decisions based on data • Have dashboards at their fingertips • To get from “here” to “there”, leaders… • Must lead a culture change • Support data use for continuous improvement

4. Data Defined: Moving Beyond Test Scores The most useful data are: • Longitudinal— follow individual students over time. • Actionable— timely, user friendly and meaningful to users. • Contextual— robust, comparable and presented as part of a bigger picture. • Interoperable— matched, linked and shared across systems and sectors.

5. 2011 National Landscape No state has all 10 Actions 10 State Actions Link P-20/W Data Systems (11 states) Create stable, sustained support (27) Develop governance structures (36) Build data repositories (44) Provide timely data access (2) Create individual student progress reports (29) Create longitudinal reports (36) Develop research agenda (31) Build educator capacity (3) Raise awareness of available data (23)

6. Agency 1 Agency 2 Agency 3 Establishing the RIGHT Structure with the RIGHT People Executive Board Data Governing Board Data Steward Group Source: NCES

7. Bridging P-20/W Silos to Ensure Effective Data Use • Please insert the bridge document here

8. P20 Governance: A Composite Solution to the Thorniest Issues

9. Minnesota Governing Body P-20 Council MDE K-12 Representation OHE Higher Education Systems DEED Business Citizens SLEDS Inter-Agency Governance Structure Relationships Research Committee: U of M MNSCU Private Colleges P-12 OHE MDE Data Advisory Committee: U of M MNSCU Private Colleges P-12 OHE MDE OET System Coordinators MDE -OHE IT STAFF MDE -OHE State Data Center OET Minnesota Department of Education: Commissioner Research staff Minnesota Office of Higher Education: Director Research staff Minnesota Office of Enterprise Technology Tech Support

10. Establishing Data Governance: State Examples • New Mexico • NM, Legislation, Bill H.B. 70a • Minnesota • MN, Minnesota P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Education Data System Charter • Minnesota P20 Education Partnership Bylaws and Resolution • Linking and Sharing Data: Governance Structures for Longitudinal Data Systems, Alice Seagren (MN) • Maryland • MD SB 275 Establishing Longitudinal Data System and Data Governance Board • Washington • Education Research and Data Center

11. A Sample of Maryland’s Policy Questions

12. Is the Data Actionable?Hawaii’s High School Feedback Report

13. Is there broad acceptance and understanding of the role of SLDS by key stakeholders? • Is there an understanding of the goals for collecting, sharing and use of these data? • Are there data champions? Who are they? • Who are the potential detractors? How do you turn them into allies? Commitment • Has the state developed agreed upon policy and programmatic questions to be addressed by data? What are they? • How are these policy and programmatic questions related to state (or agency) goals and objectives? • Does the state have realistic timelines and budget for completing relevant analysis? Policy & Programmatic Questions • Does your state have a governance structure in place to have discussions about sharing data across districts, sectors and/or states? • Is there cross-sector representation? If yes, from which agency /entity? • Is there a governance plan in place for determining which data are accessible and to whom they are accessible? Are data available to researchers? • Does the plan include what data should be collected, shared, and linked? Governance • Does your state have the necessary agreements among various sectors to ensure data can be shared across and among the P20/W spectrum and with other critical agencies? • How does your state link cross-sector data? A repository? • Is the development of a P16/P20 LDS mandated in state policy? • Has the state educational LDS received funding in the states budget? Sharing & Linking Data • Has the state developed portals to make it easier for stakeholders to access data? Has it engaged stakeholders to ensure that they are providing timely access to the data? • Has the state produced reports using student-level longitudinal data to help guide instructional and programmatic improvements? • Has the state produced reports using aggregate longitudinal statistics to help guide system improvements? Data Access & Use • Has the state developed a research agenda that leverages its linked P20/W data systems? • Has the state developed a plan to provide training and PD to policymakers, practitioners / educators, and staff who will need to use and access these data? Who is responsible for the development and implementation of this plan? • Has the state reached out to the public to inform them of available data? Building Stakeholder Capacity

14. DRAFT Recommendations for States • Ensure your state’s P20W governance body has the RIGHT structure with the RIGHTpeople • Ensure the P20W governing body has the AUTHORITY to make the necessary decisions and that the roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and complement, not compete, with other governing bodies • Determine if your current P20W governance structure is SUSTAINABLE to ensure continuity of the state’s vision for the data system to meet stakeholder needs • Ensure that the P20W governing body is meeting their responsibilities and being held ACCOUNTABLE