1 / 16

Indices of Deprivation 2004 John Langley 11 h July 2006 at The Riverside Centre Derby

Indices of Deprivation 2004 John Langley 11 h July 2006 at The Riverside Centre Derby. Commissioned by ODPM from Social Disadvantage Research Centre (Dept Social Policy & Social Research Oxford University) Built on the Structures and methodology of its predecessor ID 2000

aline-walsh
Download Presentation

Indices of Deprivation 2004 John Langley 11 h July 2006 at The Riverside Centre Derby

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Indices of Deprivation 2004John Langley11h July 2006at The Riverside Centre Derby

  2. Commissioned by ODPM from Social Disadvantage Research Centre (Dept Social Policy & Social Research Oxford University) Built on the Structures and methodology of its predecessor ID 2000 Took account of public consultations ID 2004: Indices of Deprivation 2004

  3. ID 2004: Indices of Deprivation 2004 • Main differences from ID 2000: • Lower Super Output Area measure instead of Wards • 7 domains (+ some sub-domains) instead of 6

  4. ID 2004: Indices of Deprivation 2004 • Building on ID 2000: • 7 domains (+ some sub-domains) instead of 6

  5. The Indices of Deprivation 2004 – definitional issues • A very fine geographical base – the Super Output Area (SOA) - is used for the Indices of Deprivation 2004. Each SOA contains approximately 1,500 people. There are 32,482 SOAs in England and 2,732 SOAs in the East Midlands. • It is salient to note that measuring deprivation at small area level does not imply that this is the most appropriate level at which to intervene to try and tackle deprivation. • Measurement of different dimensions (often called ‘domains’) of deprivation is based on the principle that the conditions that affect people can be measured separately and distinctly. • Seven dimensions of deprivation are identified in the Indices of Deprivation 2004: (1) Income; (2) Employment; (3) Education, Skills & Training; (4) Health & Disability; (5) Barriers to Housing and Services; (6) the Living Environment; (7) Crime. • Multiple deprivation is a combination of these more specific forms of deprivation. • Area-based measures of deprivation are relative measures (i.e. they record deprivation in one area relative to deprivation in other areas).

  6. Indices of Deprivation: measuring deprivation Measuring deprivation: • Deprivation can be measured at ‘individual’ and ‘area’ levels. • The indices of deprivation are area-based measures. • An area measured as relatively deprived by the indices of deprivation may contain people who are not deprived; conversely areas which are relatively less deprived might contain deprived people.

  7. The concept of multiple deprivation • The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 (IMD 2004) is a measure of multiple deprivation at the small area level. • The model of multiple deprivation which underpins the IMD 2004 is based on the idea of distinct dimensions of deprivation which can be recognised and measured separately. • These are experienced by individuals living in an area. People may be counted in one or more of the domains, depending on the number of types of deprivation that they experience. • The overall IMD is conceptualised as a weighted area level aggregation of these specific dimensions of deprivation.

  8. The concept of multiple deprivation: weighting of domains • Income deprivation 22.5% • Employment deprivation 22.5% • Health deprivation and disability 13.5% • Education, skills& training deprivation 13.5% • Barriers to housing and services 9.3% • Crime 9.3% • Living Environment deprivation 9.3%

  9. The proportion of the population experiencing income deprivation in an area Income deprivation

  10. Employment deprivation conceptualised as involuntary exclusion of the working age population from the world of work. Employment deprivation

  11. Education deprivation for children/young people • lack of skills and qualifications (working age) Education, Skills & Training deprivation

  12. Healthdeprivation & Disability

  13. Barriers to Housing & Services

  14. Living Environment

  15. Crime Incidence of recorded crime for 4 major crime themes

More Related