90 likes | 297 Views
Confirmation. The paradox of the 99’ Man. The Raven Paradox. A red herring confirms the hypothesis that all non-black things are non-ravens. The hypothesis that all non-black things are non-ravens is logically equivalent to the hypothesis that all ravens are black.
E N D
Confirmation The paradox of the 99’ Man
The Raven Paradox A red herring confirms the hypothesis that all non-black things are non-ravens. The hypothesis that all non-black things are non-ravens is logically equivalent to the hypothesis that all ravens are black. If (1) and (2), then a red herring confirms the hypothesis that all ravens are black. [So] A red herring confirms the hypothesis that all ravens are black.
The First Premise • A red herring confirms the hypothesis that all non-black things are non-ravens. • Nicod’s Criterion (a): A generalization is confirmed to some degree by an F that is G.
Arguments by Analogy Hamlet can be read in one evening. Hamlet is similar to Macbeth. [So] Macbeth can be read in one evening.
Arguments by Analogy This raven is black. This raven is similar to all ravens. [So] All ravens are black.
Arguments by Analogy This crow is black. This crow is similar to all ravens. [So] All ravens are black.
Arguments by Analogy This non-blackthing is a non-raven. This non-black thing is similar to all non-black things. [So] All non-black things are non-ravens.