690 likes | 792 Views
Region C Water Planning Group – Media Briefing. September 10, 2009. Welcome & Introductions. Jim Parks, Chair, Region C Water Planning Group (RCWPG) Jody Puckett, Vice Chair, RCWPG Tom Gooch, Lead Consultant, Freese & Nichols
E N D
Region C Water Planning Group – Media Briefing September 10, 2009
Welcome & Introductions • Jim Parks, Chair, Region C Water Planning Group (RCWPG) • Jody Puckett, Vice Chair, RCWPG • Tom Gooch, Lead Consultant, Freese & Nichols • Colby Walton and Jennifer Engstrand, Public Participation Consultants, Cooksey Communications
Agenda • History – Texas Water Development Board and Planning • Regional Water Planning Process • 2007 State Water Plan • Current (2006) Region C Water Plan • Development of 2011 Region C Water Plan • Q&A * Please feel free to ask questions throughout the presentation!
Background and History Texas Water Development Board and Planning
History – TWDB and Planning • In Texas, planning driven by drought • Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) founded in 1957 (1950-57 drought) • $200 million water development fund • Formal planning process • State plans from Austin in 1961, 1968, 1984, 1990, 1992, 1997 • Early plans emphasized reservoirs
Regional Water Planning Process • Senate Bill 1 - Texas Legislature in 1997 • Spurred by 1996 drought • Population projected to double by 2060 • “Bottom up” water planning process • Texas Water Development Board • Adopted rules • Set out 16 regions • Named initial planning group members
Regional Water Planning Process • 50-year planning period • Project population and water demand • Existing supply • Evaluate need for additional water • Recommend strategies • Water right permitting and TWDB funding use plans
Historical and Projected Population 50 45 40 35 30 Texas Population (Millions) 25 20 15 10 5 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Year Year Historical Projected
Historical Groundwater Level Declines Water level decline in feet less than 50 or undetermined 50 to 100 100 to 200 200 to 300 300 to 400 400 to 500 500 to 800 greater than 800
Needs • Texas does not have enough water today to meet future demand during times of drought
Strategies - Process • Regions identified 4,500 strategies • Evaluated strategies based on: • Water quantity and reliability • Financial costs • Impacts to environment and agriculture • Impacts to water quality • Other factors such as regulatory requirements, time required to implement, etc. • 9 million acre-feet per year in new supplies recommended
Costs • Total capital costs: $30.7 billion
Costs of Not Implementing Plan • Businesses and workers: $9.1 billion in 2010, $98.4 billion in 2060 • Lost local and state taxes: $466 million in 2010, $5.4 billion in 2060 • About 85 percent of the state’s population will not have enough water by 2060 in drought of record
Water Conservation • In 2007 State Water Plan • Municipal Conservation 600,000 ac-ft/yr • 47% Region C, 16% Region H • Irrigation Conservation 1,400,000 ac-ft/yr • 32% Region M, 24% Region O, 21% Region A, 10% Region K • Implementation continues
Water Supply Issue: Reuse • Differing approaches to reuse • Direct: before return to stream – easy to permit • Indirect: returned to stream and rediverted – difficult to permit • Important part of future water supply • Should be encouraged
Reuse in the 2006 Regional Plans • Projected for 1.66 million acre-feet/year by 2060 • Slight majority in Region C • Significant amounts in Regions D, H, K and L • Some reuse in 14 of 16 regions
1 2 3 4 5 6 8 7 10 9 Major Existing Interbasin Transfers
G2 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 N4 G1 H1 H2 L1 L2 M1 N1 N2 N3 Major Proposed Interbasin Transfers
Water Supply for the Metroplex • Region C – 16-county area • Collin, Cooke, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Fannin, Freestone, Grayson, Henderson (Trinity Basin portion only), Jack, Kaufman, Navarro, Parker, Rockwall, Tarrant and Wise • 1/4 of Texas’ population • 1/12 of Texas’ water use in 2000
Region C Water Supplies • 90% is surface water (vs. groundwater) • The primary rivers supplying water to the region – Trinity River, Red River, Sabine River and Sulphur River • 35 wholesale water providers and 351 water user groups (WWPs and WUGs) • 3 largest wholesale providers supply 75% (Dallas WU, Tarrant RWD, North Texas MWD) • ½ of the water used is returned to streams and lakes as treated effluent • Reuse could be a significant source of supply • A small but growing fraction is currently reclaimed and reused
Region C – Currently Available Supplies and Projected Demands
Region C – Water Supply Critical • Rapid population growth • Water supply critical to way of life, continued prosperity, protection of ecology and wildlife • Without additional water supply in Region C: • 2060 population reduced by over 1 million(7.7%) • 2060 employment reduced by nearly 700,000 jobs (17%) • 2060 annual regional income reduced by $58.8 billion (21%)
Meeting Region C’s 2060 Demand • Under the existing plan, Region C’s 2060 sources of supply would be as follows: • 31% from currently available, connected supplies (surface and groundwater) • 26% from new water conservation and reuse • 23% from new connections to existing sources • 18% from development of new reservoirs • Additional supply from development of regional systems, system operation of reservoirs and use of groundwater
Largest Region C Suppliers –Dallas Water Utilities • Supplies many other communities • Current supply – Lakes Ray Roberts, Lewisville, Ray Hubbard and Tawakoni • Planned supplies: • Conservation • Reuse • Existing Lakes Fork, Palestine, Wright Patman • New Lake Fastrill
Largest Region C Suppliers –Tarrant Regional Water District • Supplies Fort Worth, Arlington, many others • Current supply – Lakes Bridgeport, Eagle Mountain, Cedar Creek, Richland-Chambers • Planned supplies: • Conservation • Reuse • Existing Toledo Bend Lake and Oklahoma supplies • New Marvin Nichols Reservoir
Largest Region C Suppliers –North Texas Municipal Water District • Supplies communities north and east of Dallas • Current supply – Lakes Lavon, Chapman, and Texoma, and reuse • Planned supplies: • Conservation • Additional reuse • Existing Toledo Bend, Texoma, Oklahoma water • New Marvin Nichols and Lower Bois d’Arc Reservoirs
Development of 2011 Region C Water Plan Current Issues and Next Steps in the Planning Process
Status of Planning Process • First Region C Water Plan: 2001 • Second Region C Water Plan: 2006 • Now working on 2011 Region C Water Plan • Special studies to examine emerging water supply issues • Water Conservation and Reuse Study • Toledo Bend Study (with Region I) • Direct and Indirect Reuse Study • Studies Pertaining to Localized Areas • Ellis, Johnson, southern Dallas, southern Tarrant • Parker & Wise Counties
Planning Schedule • RCWPG public meetings • Sept. 28, 2009 • Nov. 9, 2009 • Jan. 2010 • Mar. 2010 • April 1, 2010: Initially Prepared Plan to TWDB • Summer 2010: Public hearings on IPP • Aug. 1, 2010: TWDB comments due • Oct. 1, 2010: final Region C Water Plan due • Dec. 31, 2010: TWDB Regional Plan review • Jan. 5, 2012: State Water Plan published
Next Steps in Planning • Reviewing updated population, demand projections • Evaluating potentially feasible water management strategies • Examining current issues
Current Issues in Planning • Implementing water conservation and reuse • Pursuing water from Oklahoma • Developing of selected new reservoirs • Drought response
Current Issues –Implementing Water Conservation • North Texas often cited as “water hogs” • Comparisons difficult because no standard measure (GPCD not standardized) • Relatively high per capita municipal use • Low per capita overall use • Very little agricultural use • Low per capita industrial use
GPCD Background • Gallons Per Capita Day (GPCD) • GPCD is a metric that has been used to track and compare water usage among cities in Texas • No Standard Methodology • Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Method • Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) Method • Water Conservation Implementation Task Force (SB 1094) Method • Water Conservation Advisory Council (SB 3 & HB 4) Method