250 likes | 407 Views
The Role of Practice-based Doctorates for Developing Professional Practice. Peter Smith, Gail Sanders, Judith Kuit, John Fulton, Helen Curtis University of Sunderland. Background. Professional Doctorates well established Nationally recognised UKCGE survey (Powell and Long) Interdisciplinary
E N D
The Role of Practice-based Doctorates for Developing Professional Practice Peter Smith, Gail Sanders,Judith Kuit,John Fulton,Helen Curtis University of Sunderland
Background • Professional Doctorates well established • Nationally recognised • UKCGE survey (Powell and Long) • Interdisciplinary • Research degree • Work-based • Based within practice • Recognises real world problems are complex and transcend subject disciplines
DProf Doctoral Qualification Equivalent to PhD Widely recognised Professional Doctorate Programmes in UK Universities: 1998 : 109 2000 : 153 (UKCGE) 2009 First International Conf (UKCGE)
Many forms • DBA • EdD • EngD • DProf
What is a Professional Doctorate? A new way of thinking A new way of working Transformation of candidate to doctoral level Reflective Impact based Based on state of the art / profession Outward looking Based on candidate’s own work Each one is different
What is a professional doctorate? A Professional Doctorate can be defined as ‘a rigorous programme of advanced study and research designed specifically to meet the needs of industry and professional groups and which develops the capacity of the individual to lead development of knowledge within their professional context.’
Some differences between a PhD and a Professional Doctorate Professional Doctorate Research-for practice, professions, applied, contribution to practice Theory and Practice- integrated Impact- personal / professional Candidates- in service, experienced, immersed in practice, have masters Outcome- Varied- portfolio, smaller dissertation, publications. Viva PhD Research-theoretical, academic, contribution to knowledge Theory and Practice- may not be integrated Impact- academic Candidates-Pre service, new to the area except via having relevant good first degree Outcome- Thesis. Viva
Timeline of programme • 2006 DProf approved by University • April 2007 7 candidates • Bi annual intakes • July 2008 scheme reviewed • Bi annual intakes • 2011 10 graduates to date • 70+ current registrations • Move to annual intakes
Student background • Senior pharmacists • Senior managers • Local colleges • Internal staff • Town planners • Engineering and ICT • Business management • Management of change
Employer background • Bank • Local Colleges • NHS • Schools • Software Houses • Automotive Engineering • Universities • Local industry • Social enterprise
Scheme structure • Portfolio-based • Retrospective/reflective element • Learning outcomes • Assessed work • Reflective practice • Research methods • Contextualisation and Planning • Doctoral report and portfolio • Viva
Support • Core team • Programme leader • Professor of education • Experienced researcher • Faculty-based advisors • Central administration • Owned by faculties • Different model to traditional supervision • More shared ownership and responsibility
Cohort concept • Cohort identity • Meet every 2 months • Deliver key material in early years • Share experiences • Present to each other • Continue to meet every 3 months until graduation
Methodology • Online questionnaire • Survey Monkey • 54% response rate • 6 Focus groups
Why did you choose to study on the Professional Doctorate programme?
How does your employer support your study on the Professional Doctorate?
Do you approach professional issues differently since studying the DProf programme?
Do you use reflective practice principles in your work context?
Themes • Cohort experience. Value shared experience. Competition. • Academic support. Values views of tutors. • Structure. Deadlines, course days, learning outcomes. • Impact. Personal, employer and community of practice. Many have changed job! • Mixed employer perceptions.
Conclusions • Practice based option • Matches policy • Work based • Real evidence of impact on practice • Part time; May be easier to fund • Can be seen by employer and individual as part of CPD